Started By
Message
Where was the lawsuit against Alabama?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:25 pm
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:25 pm
The guy played 3 years of nba g league!
7
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:30 pm to JTA1985
Cry, bitch.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:36 pm to JTA1985
And he was ruled ineligible after 4 or 5 games. Then he was off the team. LSU fans keep throwing this out like it helps their case.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:38 pm to graves1
quote:
And he was ruled ineligible after 4 or 5 games. Then he was off the team. LSU fans keep throwing this out like it helps their case.
Huh? That’s exactly the route LSU is taking except they haven’t been ruled ineligible lol. It’s the exact same scenario.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:38 pm to graves1
quote:
And he was ruled ineligible after 4 or 5 games. Then he was off the team. LSU fans keep throwing this out like it helps their case.
LSU hasn't played anyone yet.
How does Alabama play a literal pro for 4 or 5 games and LSU gets sued just for thinking about it?
Surely, you can see the selective enforcement there.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:38 pm to graves1
He was allowed to play on the grounds that he had a TRO granted to him by a friendly Alabama judge. The same as the current players in question.
But for some reason Sankey didn’t threaten severe punishment to Alabama for playing Bediako
But for some reason Sankey didn’t threaten severe punishment to Alabama for playing Bediako
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:39 pm to vidtiger23
wrong.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:40 pm to cajunbama
Nah
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:40 pm to vidtiger23
That case would seem to show the SEC does not allow players who signed professional contracts.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:40 pm to graves1
quote:
And he was ruled ineligible after 4 or 5 games. Then he was off the team. LSU fans keep throwing this out like it helps their case.
Only after the SEC won their appeal, and he was still played in 5 games with absolutely zero consequences.
I’m glad we’ve established that LSU can play these guys, with no consequences, until the SEC wins an appeal.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:43 pm to graves1
quote:
That case would seem to show the SEC does not allow players who signed professional contracts.
Yeah, seems like that has already been settled.
So why is Kiffin recruiting pros and then having them sue for eligibility when the SEC has spoken?
Seems like insubordination and conduct unbecoming that rises to the level of dismissal.
PUT EM OUT!!!
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:43 pm to RB10
No. That case shows there is a rule that they can’t play former pro players.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:44 pm to RB10
Using facts with a group who intentionally ignores them because they hate LSU and Lane Kiffin is a waste of effort
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:44 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
How does Alabama play a literal pro for 4 or 5 games and LSU gets sued just for thinking about it?
Euro Pros were playing all over CBB. What's the difference in a Euro Pro and an NBA pro. That's why Bediako sought the TRO. It would be the same scenario if former CFL players were back playing in college.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:44 pm to graves1
quote:
That case would seem to show the SEC does not allow players who signed professional contracts.
But it shows the SEC does allow players with TROs to play without consequences.
But apparently only for certain teams
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:44 pm to graves1
quote:
No. That case shows there is a rule that they can’t play former pro players.
Except they did, with zero consequences.
Then Missouri suited up and played another former pro just last night.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:45 pm to graves1
quote:
No. That case shows there is a rule that they can’t play former pro players.
It actually shows you can play them under a court order and the SEC nor NCAA will even make you vacate the games once the player was determined to be ineligible.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:45 pm to Lg
quote:
It would be the same scenario if former CFL players were back playing in college.
Interesting since State has a couple of those currently on their roster.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:46 pm to graves1
quote:
That case would seem to show the SEC does not allow players who signed professional contracts.
Correct and incorrect. That case shows the NCAA disagrees and will not allow eligibility. It also shows if a school willingly goes the court route and disobeys the original judgement nothing should occur. No law suits or anything. Then if ruled ineligible again the team should release said player. So basically nothing from what you’re saying lol.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:47 pm to Lgrnwd
quote:
But apparently only for certain teams
My favorite quote from yesterday about Sankey
quote:
Then judge said "I get what you're trying to ask and I see that he is not going to answer, but I understand his answer. He is going to follow the rules and the bylaws until the point that he is not going to follow them anymore"
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News