Started By
Message
re: What’s to prevent this from happening next year?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:11 pm to lowspark12
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:11 pm to lowspark12
quote:
What’s to prevent this from happening next year?
The players on the 2022 signing class got fricked out of a year of eligibility. Don’t you all fricking get this? Why is this so hard?
1
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:12 pm to rlebl39
quote:
Ya see the thing with this ruling is that there is a legit case here to be made that these players were screwed over. A player that voluntarily forfeited their eligibility does not have that same leg to stand on.
Seems like all it takes a single corrupt judge and it opens the gate.
And hey, if you don't do it then someone else will right?
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:13 pm to Giantkiller
quote:
The players on the 2022 signing class got fricked out of a year of eligibility. Don’t you all fricking get this? Why is this so hard?
Didn’t every player prior to 2020?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:14 pm to stopitnow1
quote:
If they deny chambliss we aren't in this situation. That case laid the framework.
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Got it.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:15 pm to NotBeBeLudwig7
quote:
Wonder why there was no outrage for the first one
1. It's not setting a precedent for future pro players to come back.
2. The rest of the conference didn't vote 15-0 directly against it only to have 1 school say frick the conference.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:15 pm to Boom33
quote:
1 school in the SEC went against the rules and wishes of the other 15 schools in the conference.
The "wishes" that they didn't try to establish until after all this shite had started already.
quote:
frick your school.
You can get fricked too.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:18 pm to rlebl39
quote:
short sighted
It’s actually supposed to be hyphenated, since we’re being pedantic.
Short-sighted
Alternatively, you can remove the space as “shortsighted” is also acceptable.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:18 pm to OleVaught14
Ignore the truth. Typical old piss behavior.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:19 pm to lowspark12
Never actually being on an NFL roster?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:25 pm to GeauxPanthers2
quote:
The "wishes" that they didn't try to establish until after all this shite had started already.
This is the first year the SEC wouldn't allow pro players?
It's always been the rule. They had to clarify the rule due to other rulings.
They did, LSU said frick the conference.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:28 pm to lowspark12
quote:
What’s to prevent this from happening next year?
Hard to say, considering Stankey has no idea what the 5 for 5 rule is.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:30 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Hypocrite.
Yep, you think everyone is like you.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:32 pm to lowspark12
Can’t wait until a 3rd year player leaves early for the NFL.. doesn’t get drafted where he wants.. and gets a better NIL offer to come back.. the NFL will surely love that too..
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:36 pm to BigBro
quote:
Can’t wait until a 3rd year player leaves early for the NFL.. doesn’t get drafted where he wants.. and gets a better NIL offer to come back.. the NFL will surely love that too..
In that case the player forfeited their eligibility. The Bediako case already set the precedent on this scenario.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:38 pm to Boom33
That is completely different. In that case the guy was told BEFORE the draft that he could STAY and PLAY one more year but HE decided not to knowing the rule. In this case, the NCAA made a retroactive rule prohibiting the 2022 class from playing their 5 of 5 year.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:39 pm to Boom33
quote:
This is the first year the SEC wouldn't allow pro players?
It's always been the rule
That's not what Bama fans said in regards to the pro basketball player they brought in last season.
Round and round we go!
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:40 pm to clf1234
quote:
That is completely different. In that case the guy was told BEFORE the draft that he could STAY and PLAY one more year but HE decided not to knowing the rule. In this case, the NCAA made a retroactive rule prohibiting the 2022 class from playing their 5 of 5 year.
So what? He wants to come back, and the precedent has already been set that the NCAA is not allowed to enforce a rule about eligibility when it comes to pro players.
It's funny that you believe suddenly there will be a rule that sticks. When all that's needed is a shady judge and a shady school to take the pro because "if we don't do it, someone else will".
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:41 pm to GeauxPanthers2
quote:
That's not what Bama fans said in regards to the pro basketball player they brought in last season.
Round and round we go!
Let me guess, you were claiming he should be able to play right?
Judges should not be deciding eligibility period.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:41 pm to Boom33
quote:
Guy has played 4 years. Decides to declare for the draft. Doesn't get drafted.
Decides he wants to come back to the NFL.
"Well, they allowed it last year" and the sport gets fricked again.
LSU did not make the rule ...Quit blaming LSU...
I hate the rule...I hate what they did to college football. What will it take for you'll LSU bashers to understand that.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:44 pm to Victry4LSU
quote:
LSU did not make the rule ...Quit blaming LSU...
I hate the rule...I hate what they did to college football. What will it take for you'll LSU bashers to understand that.
Nobody forced LSU to take the players.
You went against the conference rules, of which just recently voted 15-0 to ban this practice.
I don't think you guys understand what is happening here. This is the first time in the entire history of the SEC a school has done this. It's not about the court case and who is eligible. It's about you directly ignoring the conference rules and using the courts to bypass them.
Again, it's unprecedented in the entire history of the SEC.
You are in the equivalent of an open rebellion against the conference.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News