Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Unintended consequence of the Protect College Sports Act

Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:14 pm
Posted by BreakawayZou83
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
10319 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:14 pm
It may encourage booting members from prestigious P2/P4 conferences.

As drafted, it caps conference membership at 19 schools. it also prevents P4 on P4 violence by imposing a very harsh requirement that a school leaving a P4 conference for another P4 conference must spend five years as independent. This does not apply to independent or G6 schools who wish to move to a P4 conference.

There is absolutely no protection for schools who get the boot from a P4 conference, and it is ambiguous if the five year independent purgatory rule would apply to them.

I could conceive of a situation where the B1G, who is clearly holding out for Notre Dame, realizes that the Irish aren't joining up anytime soon. So they add North Carolina instead, to the chagrin of the ACC and SEC.

Say five years later, Notre Dame finally contacts the B1G and says it is time. The B1G has no more membership slots. Tough luck, Purdue. Enjoy your life in the Pac.

It needed some teeth on booting members: maybe the conference has to pay the booted member its share for a number of years. Maybe that emptied slot is locked out for a decade, so the conference operates a member down instead of upgrading instantly.

The better rule would to simply not have Congress impose a membership cap. Their effort to prevent consolidation are comically too late, and their attempt to intervene may simply exacerbate the problem.
Posted by Marcelo Lavanda
Manaus, Amazonas
Member since Oct 2024
441 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Purdue


replace Purdue with Rutgers and no one bats an eye
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
90956 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

It may encourage booting members from prestigious P2/P4 conferences.



conferences started getting retarded a few years ago anyway. Oklahoma in the southeastern conference? UCLA in the big 10? California in the Atlanta coast conference?

Booting some teams might be the least dumb thing about it.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
77743 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Oklahoma in the southeastern conference?
Argument could be made. Plus Oklahoma borders 3 other SEC states. One of the only thing Sankey has done that I like is making sure ever state in the conference borders at least 2 other SEC states

quote:

UCLA in the big 10? California in the Atlanta coast conference?
These are ridiculous and it’s a big reason I think teams will willingly leave the BIG 10 eventually. I could 100% see UCLA, CAL, Stanford and MAYBE Washington leaving the ACC and BIG to join back up with the PAC-12 if they can get somewhat of a solid TV deal.
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 12:38 pm
Posted by BreakawayZou83
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
10319 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

conferences started getting retarded a few years ago anyway. Oklahoma in the southeastern conference? UCLA in the big 10? California in the Atlanta coast conference?

Booting some teams might be the least dumb thing about it.


Except it wouldn't be Oklahoma. It would be Vanderbilt and Mississippi State. And you know I'm right because this is strictly about more money for the ones who dictate the flow of the money.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
90956 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Oklahoma borders 3 other SEC states


well by golly then, why stop there? Colorado borders oklahoma, guess they should be in the SEC too?

quote:

One of the only thing Sankey has done that I like is making sure ever state in the conference borders at least 2 other SEC states


be even nicer if it was a requirement for SEC schools to be in the Southeastern united states but I guess I'm a dreamer that way
Posted by Uga Alum
Member since Jul 2022
6831 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:39 pm to
The 19 team limit kills Florida St. They want the B1G badly but would not get an invitation because the B1G is holding out for Notre Dame.

FSU would have to beg the SEC to let them in or stay in the unprofitable ACC lol.
Posted by Dawgs2122
Member since Dec 2024
2713 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:40 pm to
They should cap it at 10. That would be a positive change for the sport. Also come up with some maximum distance rule. No more ACC schools overlooking the Pacific Ocean
Posted by Coke Man
Member since Nov 2023
302 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:42 pm to
I think the original 10 + 2 would be safe. Then it’s choosing between UT, OU, A&M, and Mizzou. Out of those 4…Mizzou is getting the boot.
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
32595 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

by imposing a very harsh requirement that a school leaving a P4 conference for another P4 conference must spend five years as independent. This does not apply to independent or G6 schools who wish to move to a P4 conference.



Wow, I wasn’t aware of that. Imagine a team like Clemson wants to join SEC just for argument sake. If they have to be gone from current conf for 5 years before they can join SEC - they would get way less TV revenue for those 5 years. It would kill the program to try that. Plus pay any penalties leaving current conference.

There is no way anyone could financially leave a current conference if in P4 now.

If I’m reading correctly this bill would freeze all 4 P4 conferences forever. Only changes could come from a non-P4 joining which won’t happen.
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 12:48 pm
Posted by paperwasp
2x HRV 2025 Poster of the Year
Member since Sep 2014
30734 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

It would be Vanderbilt and Mississippi State

I don't know if Vanderbilt's data is available, but there is a chance it's Mississippi State and Ole Miss, or perhaps South Carolina, if you're just looking at the athletic department as a whole.

I believe those three schools were reported to have the lowest 2024 total revenues, at least.
Posted by Jauquismos
Member since Jul 2023
1352 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:50 pm to
I absolutely loathe what they have done and continue to do with college football.

Posted by Pickle_Weasel
Member since Mar 2016
5503 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

FSU would have to beg the SEC to let them in or stay in the unprofitable ACC lol.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't they turn down the SEC during the 91/92 expansion? Or, was there not really a concrete offer on the table for them?
Posted by Uga Alum
Member since Jul 2022
6831 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:59 pm to
Things have changed. The SEC and B1G are going to leave the other conferences behind economically. If you’re not in one of those two conferences now, you’re screwed.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
39262 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Unintended consequence of the Protect College Sports Act
Makes the toothless NCAA even more toothless maybe not even have any gums.
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
25982 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 2:07 pm to
That act is terrible.
Posted by phaz
Waddell, AZ
Member since Jan 2009
7023 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 2:11 pm to
You are missing that teams leaving 1 conference have to be independent 5 years before going to another conference, nobody is doing that.
Posted by tBrand
Member since Oct 2022
4255 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Oklahoma borders 3 other SEC states

But none of those other SEC states "founding member" states. Texas borders Louisiana. Hell, Missouri borders Tennessee and Kentucky (barely).

Oklahoma is an interloper in our great conference and they should go back to the Big 12 where they are more comfortable.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter