Started By
Message

re: Unintended consequence of the Protect College Sports Act

Posted on 8/4/26 at 3:11 pm to
Posted by bamabaseballsec
Member since Dec 2020
4130 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 3:11 pm to
They did, but so did Texas atm and supposed sec darling unc.
Posted by bamabaseballsec
Member since Dec 2020
4130 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 3:16 pm to
You are missing that teams leaving 1 conference have to be independent 5 years before going to another conference, nobody is doing that.

I think the 20 team cap kills expansion more than anything. The sec benefits none from southeastern expansion(clem Miami fsu). Sec was only considering southeast expansion bc you can’t let the big have the Greenville, Tallahassee and Miami markets(huge cfb markets in sec country). Now that the big is blocked from southern expansion those schools value dropped again.
Posted by RunningJacket
Member since Dec 2008
1069 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 3:57 pm to
If you guys really believe this act is the end then you are naive. This is just the latest blip,
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35832 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Argument could be made. Plus Oklahoma borders 3 other SEC states.


I'm not sure who borders who is a valid consideration; given time, everyone would border a member.

Technically Kansas borders 2 members. Should they get consideration?
Posted by New Money
Athens, GA
Member since Jun 2023
4400 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 4:13 pm to
So when do we kick out Mizzou?
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter