Started By
Message

This all gets back to Chambliss and Ole Miss.

Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:36 pm
Posted by 1609tiger
Member since Feb 2011
3845 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:36 pm
The SEC ruled Chambliss ineligible. He got a state court to issue a TRO allowing him to play. The SEC did not object and the last time I checked he was playing. Basically precedent is set. Kiffin, logically felt these guys would be eligible with a state court order. Like he said if we don’t try to get these players someone else will. It’s SEC inconsistency that cause this.
This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 3:43 pm
Posted by tBrand
Member since Oct 2022
4323 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:37 pm to
thanks
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
75300 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:37 pm to
Goes way further back than that.
Posted by NFLSU
Screwston, Texas
Member since Oct 2014
22048 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:37 pm to
Which program is fricked the most when the SEC comes out and says "we will actually abide by NCAA enforcement"...?

I can only think of one.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
54806 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:39 pm to
I believe there is one major difference in the two situations. Can you find the difference? I’m asking as condescendingly as possible, like Mickey on Mickey Mouse’s Clubhouse.
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
13839 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Kiffen
Posted by 1609tiger
Member since Feb 2011
3845 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:40 pm to
No why don’t you explain the difference.
Posted by stopitnow1
Florida
Member since Mar 2013
3047 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:41 pm to
A sore throat?
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
78473 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

The SEC ruled Chambliss ineligible
No they didn’t
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
54806 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

No why don’t you explain the difference.

Chambliss didn’t declare for the draft or go pro in any capacity, yet you’ve made the assertion that a “precedent is set.” Why don’t you elaborate on this?
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
75300 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Chambliss didn’t declare for the draft or go pro in any capacity, yet you’ve made the assertion that a “precedent is set.” Why don’t you elaborate on this?


Put the draft/pro part out of your mind, that's the first step.

The SEC is attempting to use 14.01.01 vs Kiffin because they didn't have a rule in place at the time, Chambliss would also be in violation of this bylaw. Anyone playing under any type of injunction is.
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
26655 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

The SEC ruled Chambliss ineligible


This should be nothing but downvotes. The SEC did not rule him ineligible and just like Pavia, he is going to play the whole season.
Posted by RebelExpress38
In your base, killin your dudes
Member since Apr 2012
14394 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:51 pm to
What NFL team was Chambliss on?
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
75300 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

The SEC did not rule him ineligible and just like Pavia, he is going to play the whole season.


Correct.

But they should have, based on their opinion in the filing vs Kiffin. Selective enforcement, at its best. It'd be interesting if that's brought up in any type of blowback to potential sanctions.



Posted by IM_4_LSU
McKinney, TX
Member since Mar 2014
14655 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:51 pm to
NCAA declared him ineligible. SEC never came out and stated anything. They let the court order dictate his eligibility. That is the hypocritical nature of which the SEC is operating. They are selective with their self Governance. If they would have come out and supported the SEC's position then it would have been different but they remained quiet.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
19642 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

The SEC ruled Chambliss ineligible.

The SEC didn't do shite. Same with the Pavia situation. They sat on their hands.
Posted by IM_4_LSU
McKinney, TX
Member since Mar 2014
14655 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

What NFL team was Chambliss on?


This is completely irrelevant. Say the SEC didn't rule him ineligible but don't bring up irrelevant shite. Jesus.
Posted by Buster83
Somewhere in Texas usually
Member since Aug 2021
6020 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:56 pm to
If you really believe that the Chambliss issue and the two NFL players are the same issue then you are either completely ignorant or somewhat retarded. It also proves that you are an LOLSU poster. No other schools fans on this board are that ignorant.
Posted by Rebelinexile
Member since Oct 2021
385 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:58 pm to
So you’re saying Kiffin opened this can
because Chambliss stayed at Ole Miss
instead of following him to LSU. How
ungrateful can Kiffin be ? Chambliss
saved his season at Ole Miss last year.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
75300 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

If you really believe that the Chambliss issue and the two NFL players are the same issue then you are either completely ignorant or somewhat retarded. It also proves that you are an LOLSU poster. No other schools fans on this board are that ignorant.


The SEC alleged that Kiffin violated Article 14.01.01 of the SEC Bylaws in their filings.

Coaches/programs playing any athlete under an injunction currently would be guilty of the same violation.

This is way above your pay grade, Buster.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter