Started By
Message

re: The Surrender Gene is embedded deep into the DNA of the French part of every Cajun. So ...

Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:30 am to
Posted by countrytiger60
Larose
Member since Sep 2018
4710 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:30 am to
hey pussy, if you're scared just say it.
Posted by DCtiger1
Member since Jul 2009
12135 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:33 am to
You understand the issue was that there were no rules established for this situation? Once the SEC set rules and penalties, LSU said cool we won't roster the players. The fact that you people are onboard with this nonsense is shocking. No one is arguing the SEC can't make its own rules. They are arguing that no rules were broken, and that the rules need to be clear and applied evenly to all circumstances
Posted by terriblegreen
Spokane, LA
Member since Aug 2011
12603 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:37 am to
It’s sad that you Sankey lovers can’t quit crying over this.
Posted by Swamp Angel
West Georgia Chicken Farm Territory
Member since Jul 2004
10615 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:46 am to
quote:

Georgia let a Yankee pos burn half their state to the ground.


And that Yankee POS had founded LSU only four years before torching Atlanta. (I've always had mixed feelings about this.)
Posted by koreandawg
South Korea
Member since Sep 2015
14590 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:01 am to
quote:

You understand the issue was that there were no rules established for this situation? Once the SEC set rules and penalties, LSU said cool we won't roster the players. The fact that you people are onboard with this nonsense is shocking. No one is arguing the SEC can't make its own rules. They are arguing that no rules were broken, and that the rules need to be clear and applied evenly to all circumstances


Not really.

Once rules were made you said you wouldn't break the rule.

Then you proceeded to make a roster of only 103 players, knowing there were two NFL players you had enrolled and were trying to get on your roster. This was no secret.

Your coach didn't say "we're not gonna roster these players". He said "we're gonna wait for guidance".

Finally, it took a threat to make you back down and submit a full roster without those NFL contract players.

If you were never going to roster the players, why did you submit a roster of 103? What was the purpose? If you say it was just to screw around with Sankey and the other 15 schools, well you got what you wanted and you deserved every bit of it.

Like I said before, you don't get to threaten someone with a knife or gun in your hand, put it away when the police come and then say "What's the problem? No one is dead."
This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 7:04 am
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17242 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:25 am to
quote:

France has the most military victories in history, and I'm not even French.


It's hard to get through to morons whose entire concept of military history stems from a superficial understanding of WWII.

They don't even have knowledge of the war 20 years prior that utterly invalidates their stupidity. Too stupid to be embarrassed.
Posted by IM_4_LSU
McKinney, TX
Member since Mar 2014
14655 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:30 am to
Speak from a position of knowledge not ignorance.
Posted by savecf101
Member since Dec 2024
93 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:58 am to
You will see what LSU won when the next recruiting season comes around. LSU and Lane Kiffin and the Sate of Louisiana stood behind players that were being unjustly treated. They stood behind them so strongly it took the entire SEC to collude to stop it. LK showed over and beyond loyalty to two of his past players. And through all of this LSU put the best team in the country on the field this past Saturday. Looks like winning to me.
Posted by 2300_Nueces
Member since Mar 2026
7 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 8:00 am to
The French have always bobbed the knob.
Posted by GhostofAlfredBlue
Member since Nov 2023
250 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 8:06 am to
a person from Georgia saying this lolololol.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
75296 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 8:55 am to
quote:

And I'll say again as I've said before, if this thing is a slam dunk easy case for LSU to win, why did you capitulate?

You should have been hoping this thing gets to a judge as quickly as possible.


I absolutely think they did. You can tell by the lack of clear definitions within the rule. You can tell by the complete overreaction and lack of confidence in their rule.

quote:

And I'll say again as I've said before, if this thing is a slam dunk easy case for LSU to win, why did you capitulate?

You should have been hoping this thing gets to a judge as quickly as possible.


I was originally talking about the 1A case on its own, you seem to be speaking of something different.
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
49016 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 8:57 am to
And another one

Who’s state is the only one in the SE that is blue, nontheless


Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
75296 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Not really.

Once rules were made you said you wouldn't break the rule.

Then you proceeded to make a roster of only 103 players, knowing there were two NFL players you had enrolled and were trying to get on your roster. This was no secret.

Your coach didn't say "we're not gonna roster these players". He said "we're gonna wait for guidance".

Finally, it took a threat to make you back down and submit a full roster without those NFL contract players.

If you were never going to roster the players, why did you submit a roster of 103? What was the purpose? If you say it was just to screw around with Sankey and the other 15 schools, well you got what you wanted and you deserved every bit of it.


As you said, the conference had clear rules and penalties established for their rules, why were they worried about threats?

If LSU rosters the players, just enact the penalties. Pretty simple. I'm not exactly sure why people believe the conference had to continue to threaten LSU after the rule was created.


Posted by TD422
Destrehan, LA
Member since Jun 2019
983 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:09 am to
quote:

Once rules were made you said you wouldn't break the rule.


OK, Champ, let's keep it simple.

WHAT RULE DID LSU BREAK? Be specific. We'll wait.
Posted by 1801
Charleston
Member since Aug 2012
9095 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:12 am to
quote:


Yall play the Battle Hymn of the Republic when you score touchdowns.

We don't celebrate by playing the song of our conquerors.


Just saying
Georgia never employed their "conqueror" as Superintendent of UGA either - just sayin -



y'all need to burn that shite down in Ascension Parrish - just sayin -
Posted by koreandawg
South Korea
Member since Sep 2015
14590 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:13 am to
quote:

As you said, the conference had clear rules and penalties established for their rules, why were they worried about threats?

If LSU rosters the players, just enact the penalties. Pretty simple. I'm not exactly sure why people believe the conference had to continue to threaten LSU after the rule was created.


You never answer this: If you had no intention of rostering those players, why did you submit a 103 player roster? The rules were laid out before you submitted your 103 player roster. You are the only school that did not submit a 105 player roster that I'm aware of.

Posted by jepapo
Member since Sep 2022
262 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:29 am to
Someone is sad that their school’s time at the top of the conference is over. Haha.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
75296 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:34 am to
quote:

You never answer this: If you had no intention of rostering those players, why did you submit a 103 player roster? The rules were laid out before you submitted your 103 player roster. You are the only school that did not submit a 105 player roster that I'm aware of.


I think they were leaving their options open, in case some miracle happened and the SEC got destroyed in court, but that was always a long shot.

Lots of schools have open spots on their rosters, especially schools that just went through a coaching change.
Posted by koreandawg
South Korea
Member since Sep 2015
14590 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:54 am to
quote:

I think they were leaving their options open, in case some miracle happened and the SEC got destroyed in court, but that was always a long shot.


You think?


So in other words they weren't for sure gonna follow the rules. They might break the rules.

You realize you aren't the only school to change coaches and you hired yours first. So somehow all of the others were able to get 105 players rostered but you who had two contracted NFL players enrolled, but might have been saving those two spots for someone else.

Listen to yourself man.

This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 9:56 am
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
42261 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:06 am to
quote:

You are the only school that did not submit a 105 player roster that I'm aware of.


I don't believe you've actually done any research on that.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter