TD422

A good friend of mine was so angry that BYU was named National Champion that he took the sports page announcing that win, neatly folded it up, placed it in a paper grocery bag, and proceeded to take a dump on it. :lol: :spank:

Not his proudest moment, but it did show his commitment to just how much of an outrageous outcome that was. I mean, really...BYU's national championship game was a 6-5 Michigan? :doublebird:

quote:

---

intelligence, consistency, and rational thought

---

I have not seen any of this in a good faith, logical counter to "LSU did nothing wrong" or "LSU isn't being treated differently than other schools that recruited / rostered / played these players."

quote:

---

All because you can't admit and take your penalties for the actions.

Kicking you out is the right choice the longer this goes on.

---

I've held my thoughts, until this.

What rule DID LSU BREAK to accept penalties?

And you Bama jackass (apologies to all other Bama fans), you keep droning on about the SEC filing suit because they feared LSU would try to prevent them from kicking them out. DO YOU REALIZE, YOU SISTER FRICKING MOUTH BREATHING TRAILER PARK TRASH that LSU's President sent a letter, DIRECTLY to the SEC office and Greg Sankey, that they would not interfere with the conference's wish to take a vote? in early SEPTEMBER? And here you are in October blowing smoke out your arse, entirely WRONG in your assertion. Want me to link the letter, dumbass?

Well, we'll have to agree to disagree. You have that right. But I have never seen him be any of those things. I suspect you WANT him to be that, and again, you have your opinion. But I like to believe I can view someone on the other side of the aisle and give them credit where it's due. Charlie always gave those that disagreed with him the opportunity to change his opinion, by giving them the opportunity to present their argument. Not a very good way of being nasty or bigoted, because it would expose him to everyone, even his supporters.

quote:

---

Why give them what they want?

---

Great question, but to play devil's advocate...what can we do to respond that doesn't give them some sort of propaganda to spread around? If we send a six man team to kill a terrorist leader, do you believe that word isn't spread throughout their community? If we shoot one civilian that a terrorist is hiding behind, will they let that pass? And on the other extreme, if we bomb the crap out of say a training facility, would that not be used to promote their message? Not to mention, is there much doubt that whatever message they promote isn't filled with outright lies?

They're playing by a different set of rules than we are. But this isn't a "tea and cookies" sort of engagement where we have to remain polite. Our side establishes rules about how to engage, when to engage, and where it's acceptable to engage, and before you know it, we've tied our own hands. It's tragic that humans can do this to each other, but at some point, restraint isn't enough. Unless you are willing to accept more of the same.

He once replied to a post that he's the "arbiter of truth" on this board. It was at that moment I knew he is a real piece of work. :spank:

quote:

---

You ASSUMED I was speaking of you

Who were you speaking about?

---

Oh, I was absolutely speaking about you. I just find it interesting that you KNEW I was speaking about you. Sort of a poker face tell, if you will.

quote:

---

I'm constantly criticizing MAGA for its leftist spending and leftist deficits, also.

---

And I'll back you on that specific issue as well. But you see, you can't pull one example out of dozens that you've commented on, commonly steering the response (deflection?) left, and claim you're a conservative. Conservatives don't need "supporters" that are 90 / 10 left / right. And that split might be overly generous for you.

You jumped in here pretty quickly, assuming I was speaking about you, Counselor. :rotflmao:

ETA:

quote:

---

Yeah I don't want the right associated with people looking like retards, which OP does.

---

And this would be more believable if you actually tried DEFENDING the right on occasion...

I'll second, third, or fourth the Cytopoint suggestions. I have a mini Dachshund that would get covered in a rash when he went through fresh cut grass in the summer. Cytopoint injections monthly for about 4 months last summer and it controlled the rash amazingly well. So well that this summer, he didn't need a single injection.

Good Luck!

I have an issue with your constantly presenting yourself as the "truth", as if no else is capable of understanding the issue, or if it's possible that there's more to an issue than YOU see. I don't have a issue with the disagreement; our system of government works better that way. It's the "I know better than you" attitude that sends people off. You don't "discuss", you lecture. How do I come to that conclusion? Most will admit when they were wrong, or at least "off the mark." You, on the other hand, double down.

I have an image of you posting while standing on your desk with your Captain America cape on, a desk fan flapping the cape around in the breeze, thinking "I'm here to SAVE Tigerdroppings."

That and you have yet to find a right-sided issue you like all the while screaming "bUt I'm oN ThE riGHT".

You know why I hate corrupt police officers? Because at least the criminals have the balls to present themselves as such. Don't dress up as one thing and act like the other.

It's clear to see when SFP is in a position where he can't address the question at hand directly, he begins to parse words. He's been doing that forever. He's an attorney, after all. It's what they do.