Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/4/11 at 7:56 pm to hatvol96
Should have been Kstate IMO.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 7:56 pm to GamerAg
herbie's comments about the Sugar only picking teams to put asses in hotel rooms is the same logic he used to push the rematch ... it was about ratings for ESPN. just saying.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 7:56 pm to hatvol96
Not as bad as 2007. Mizzou beat Kansas by 2 scores the last week of the regular season. Mizzou finished 11-1, Kansas 11-1. Oh but wait, Mizzou got to play in the Big 12 championship game vs Oklahoma (who had beaten them earlier). If Mizzou won, they would play for the national title.
Well Oklahoma won, went to the Fiesta Bowl, and the Orange Bowl selected????? Kansas. A team that had beaten a bunch of 1-AA teams and 2 teams with a winning record all season long.
Well Oklahoma won, went to the Fiesta Bowl, and the Orange Bowl selected????? Kansas. A team that had beaten a bunch of 1-AA teams and 2 teams with a winning record all season long.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 7:56 pm to 1fairbank
quote:
Look at the Orange Bowl
A complete joke.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 7:57 pm to Coonass
quote:
herbie's comments about the Sugar only picking teams to put asses in hotel rooms is the same logic he used to push the rematch ... it was about ratings for ESPN. just saying.
non-title BCS bowls are about maximizing revenue for the bowls. they're exhibition games
Posted on 12/4/11 at 7:58 pm to Hubbhogg
quote:
Hogs should've been allowed to play in that game. BCS blows
No way. You lost to OSU last year.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 7:58 pm to hatvol96
VT is playing Clemson again on ESPNU right now. Maybe they'll fare better tonight.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:00 pm to 1fairbank
The Orange Bowl didn't have a choice. They have to take the ACC champion and they had the last pick and West Virginia was an automatic qualifier.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:02 pm to hatvol96
K State should be in that game in my opinion
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:05 pm to RedMustang
Are you sure it's just not Clemson continuing to run the score up for the hell of it?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:10 pm to GamerAg
quote:
Michigan vs. Virginia Tech in the BCS at-large bowl is even worse than Bama getting into the MNC. This whole system is a complete farce.
I agree with this.
All the match-ups look ugly.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:12 pm to Alltheway Tigers!
Oklahoma State-Stanford should be interested. Don't have much interest in watching the rest.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:15 pm to parkjas2001
Sugar Bowl screwed up big time. How would embarrassed VT fans fill-up the dome more than excited to be in the BCS teams like: K St, Baylor, and Boise
Total fail. I'm from there and I'm embarrassed.
Total fail. I'm from there and I'm embarrassed.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:21 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
No way. You lost to OSU last year.
They would've beat LSU's arse last year.
:transitiveproperty:
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
it's an exhibition anyway, so it doesn't really mater
Oy vey
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:28 pm to hatvol96
Va Tech. How can they not appear in an unwatchable BCS bowl. It's tradition like the Lions on Thanksgiving.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:31 pm to hatvol96
quote:. . . . elevated JerryWorld'sCottonBowl back to its historical status. Glad to see it.
The Sugar Bowl Committee Just
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:32 pm to AtlantaLSUfan
quote:
How would embarrassed VT fans fill-up the dome more than excited to be in the BCS teams like: K St, Baylor, and Boise
VT has the most delusional fanbase i've ever seen. They forget about losses incredibly fast. To them, last night never happened.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:32 pm to Sao
quote:
Oy vey
the frick? that's true
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News