Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Make Orwell Fiction Again
Biography:Warmest climes but nurse the cruellest fangs: the tiger of Bengal crouches in spiced groves of ceaseless verdure.
Interests:Cornucopian ends attained.
Occupation:Physician
Number of Posts:139997
Registered on:9/28/2003
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

but she did close to 250 CABs last year.
that's busy enough.

Minimums would be at least 50-70 CABGs/yr by the surgeon and at least 250 CABGs/yr for the facility.
quote:

Instead, they primarily look for cases of major national significance, unresolved questions of federal law
Like ... hypothetically ... as a random example ... a case where the state legislature in hatred of a political opponent, decided to screw blind justice, decided to screw judicial fairness, in order to screw the political opponent?

re: USSC Sides With E Jean Carroll

Posted by NC_Tigah on 6/29/26 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

I have zero sympathy for anyone with poor enough judgment to hire Alina Habba to represent them in a case of this import.
Dude, Trump could have employed the reincarnation of Clarence Darrow. He'd have still received the equivalent of Emmet Till's Tallahatchie County jury "fairness."

We are living a complete throwback in courtroom justice, only instead of skin color, politics is the origin of our neo-injustice
quote:

More Europeans die from heat than Americans die from guns
:wha: :scared: :scared:

re: Boomers and banking apps

Posted by NC_Tigah on 6/29/26 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

Boomers and any technology really.
:rotflmao: :rotflmao:

No you didn't! :rotflmao:

quote:

Yet somehow when they hit 50's & 60's, it's their first day on the planet every single day
How many "when they hit 50's" "boomers" do you know?

re: Boomers and banking apps

Posted by NC_Tigah on 6/29/26 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

Found out he was checking his balance as many as 50 times a day
Is he well? Late 70's/80?
Serious question.
quote:

CABGs are incredibly routine now
Actually that is not as true now as it was in the past d/t increasingly aggressive PTCA. At one point CABG was the most common procedure in the OR lagging only c-section overall. Often the patients were less disease advanced (again d/t PTCA peeling off the "simpler" cases) But the more 'routine' for surgeon and facility, the better the odds of good outcome. It sounds like your wife is part of that kind of program.
quote:

The surgeon definitely downplayed the extent of how bad it might be
That could be good, or bad TBH
What do you know about the surgeon? How many CABGs does he perform/yr? On-pump, off-pump? How many are done at the facility where your dad intends to have surgery? Those are very important tells in terms of heart surgery outcome. If the numbers are low in either case, explore alternatives.
quote:

Why are all the leftist male posters skipping over the naked dong thread?
Duh ... No pics.

re: USSC Sides With E Jean Carroll

Posted by NC_Tigah on 6/29/26 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

The appeal failed. She gets $5 mil.
Yes

quote:

You're arguing semantics, man. What useless shite is that?
Read Carefully ...

BECAUSE WHAT THE COWARDS DID WAS NOT ONLY TO DENY THE APPEAL, BUT TO AVOID HAVING TO REVIEW THE NY CORRUPT PROCESS LEADING TO THE CASE IN THE FIRST PLACE. AS WITH TX V PA, THIS IS NOT SIMPLY A BAD FINDING, IT IS A DERELICTION.
quote:

Should be a capitol crime to alter or withhold any exculpatory evidence
She should receive double the portion of any time/penalty her lies contributed to defendants sentences with sentences to run sequentially + full civil liability.

Nifong got 1 night in prison :banghead:

re: USSC Sides With E Jean Carroll

Posted by NC_Tigah on 6/29/26 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

'Siding with' doesn't have to mean affirming the facts.
It does in this case.

Again, you either didn't understand the finding, or you didn't understand the post you were responding to, or as it increasingly appears, your understood neither of those.

re: USSC Sides With E Jean Carroll

Posted by NC_Tigah on 6/29/26 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

There are literally thousands of jury verdicts that get made on less than that evidence all the time.
There was literally NO EVIDENCE against DJT other than the lying claim Carrol brought to court.

re: USSC Sides With E Jean Carroll

Posted by NC_Tigah on 6/29/26 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Yeah, affirming the judgement, siding with Carroll.

I agree it sucks, but your cope is not cutting it.
Perhaps you didn't read my post.

But to be clear, SCOTUS declined to hear the case (denied certiorari). It did not issue a ruling affirming the facts or the jury’s findings itself. PERIOD

As I stated what Roberts & Co did was worse IMO than if they had heard the case and found against Trump, because the result is identical, but the method is cowardly. Cope with it yourself.
quote:

Where is the line?
Loss of logic other than OMB
quote:

If someone accused you of rape the burden should be a bit higher the he said she said especially when is 30 years later and she didnt remember the day time month or even year but it definitely happened.
... and she claimed it occurred in a dressing room which is always locked unless an attendant let's shoppers in, and there were no witnesses despite the lying bitch claiming she ran out of the dressing room with her pants still down, in an area where there are alway sales staff, and the fact the outfit she claimed to be wearing was not even designed for >1yr after she claimed the assault took place ...
quote:

Ok...and? Boomer Republicans typically support globalism, modern monetary policy, and neoconservative foreign policy. At least the politicians yall vote for do.
:confused: :confused: :confused:

Y'all?

Young voters favored Kamala Harris to Donald Trump, 52% to 46%, in the 2024 presidential election LINK

For Baby Boomers (ages 60–78 in 2024), estimates put Trump’s support at approximately 52%–54% of Boomer voters, with Harris getting roughly 46%–48% LINK

re: USSC Sides With E Jean Carroll

Posted by NC_Tigah on 6/29/26 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

USSC Sides With E Jean Carroll
Nah.
They declined to even look at it, which is even more of a travesty considering how NY manipulated law to specifically invite the case. Roberts is a coward.
quote:

Now, back to the title of the OP. It's very likely when the SCOTUS rules on birthright citizenship it will completely disregard the original intent of the 14A which was to grant citizenship to recently emancipated black Americans. Instead it will use subsequent rulings that incrementally bastardized the 14A to allow anyone to drop a child in the US with the sole intent of staking their unearned claim of US citizenship.
I don't think this court has the guts to do that. Roberts will likely punt the thing on procedural grounds, identically to what he did with TX v PA.

My guess is the ruling will allow the law to stand as is, holding that Trump lacks the ability to correct it via EO. De facto, it's the same outcome, except the Court will not address the mistakes of Ark at all.
quote:

Tucker has had a mental collapse it seems
I've been saying that for a while, not in the pejorative sense, but rather, in a clinical sense. Something is wrong with him. I hope it doesn't end badly.