
NC_Tigah
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | Make Orwell Fiction Again |
| Biography: | Warmest climes but nurse the cruellest fangs: the tiger of Bengal crouches in spiced groves of ceaseless verdure. |
| Interests: | Cornucopian ends attained. |
| Occupation: | Physician |
| Number of Posts: | 138866 |
| Registered on: | 9/28/2003 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
All three arrested.
One is named "Honesty"
One is named "Honesty"
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:Just in time to clear SOL for perjury charges when the lying SOB is exposed?
Biden Judge Rules That Michael Fanone's Full Body Cam Footage Must be Made Public
re: AZ Voter Databases Have a Problem (ZarkFiles Research Thread)
Posted by NC_Tigah on 5/15/26 at 12:17 pm to AaronDeTiger
quote:Well done :cheers:
AaronDeTiger
quote:Perfect :lol:
Cohen has chickened
quote:Was this the bus?
Two bus loads of Messican men and no women.
Why? Someone explain it to me.
re: Massie loyalists will try to argue against this but, it's the truth.
Posted by NC_Tigah on 5/15/26 at 10:21 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:I understand it perfectly Rog.
You clearly dont understand cause/effect
E.g., Trump says "the sky is blue" which triggers your TDS-respondent screech "NOT AT NIGHT, IT ISN'T ! ! !"
That is cause (DJT saying anything) and effect (TDS-driven response).
The problem here is we are discussing economics, which you don't seem to understand.
re: Massie loyalists will try to argue against this but, it's the truth.
Posted by NC_Tigah on 5/15/26 at 10:04 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:A collapse in demand is not a “supply shock.”
Yes, there were supply shocks pertinent to 2020. Caused by massive infusion of cash, and empty supply chains.
The "shock" comes from massive supply-demand mismatch.
The latter was not a 2020 component. It was a 2021 issue.
quote:Totally different issue. You argue those were not necessary. Regardless, they occurred. It is a separate subject and a separate debate.
Without the shutdowns
The economic question, the question we are addressing, is as to what follow-up response should have been.
quote:Not anywhere near the levels of supply chain disruption we actually experienced.
supply chain disruption ... was doomed to happen on re-opening.
re: Massie loyalists will try to argue against this but, it's the truth.
Posted by NC_Tigah on 5/15/26 at 9:46 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:There were no supply shocks pertinent to 2020. Hence, the fact you're deflecting ... again.
You cant put 5t out there, then experience supply shocks and supply chain issues, without bad inflation.
re: Massie loyalists will try to argue against this but, it's the truth.
Posted by NC_Tigah on 5/15/26 at 9:44 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:The Beijing summit was originally scheduled for March 31 – April 2, 2026. It was postponed by Trump d/t the Iran war. Prior to that, rumors swirled that Xi intended to announce to Trump, and then to the public that “China will reunify with Taiwan,” basically a proclamation China would take Taiwan.
Yes, being anti war like MAGA was just a few months ago is delusional.
As it turns out, Xi did not go there.
It would appear something changed. We can speculate on what that "something" was. IMO, it was related to Iran.
re: Massie loyalists will try to argue against this but, it's the truth.
Posted by NC_Tigah on 5/15/26 at 9:29 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:They are not.
Both statements are in agreement.
But your response is a distraction from the real point.
Given the 2020 economic shutdowns, there was a binary option, either print money or go into depression. That's it. You opine we should have chosen the latter. A depression would have been far more costly than the $3T in expenditures.
That was not the equation in 2021 when an additional $2T was dumped into a reopened economy with horrendous demand-supply mismatches already in play.
re: Massie/Gallrein is a generational battleground.
Posted by NC_Tigah on 5/15/26 at 9:07 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:Dumb take.
generational battleground
re: Senators agree to go wout pay during shutdowns after historic closures left workers unpaid
Posted by NC_Tigah on 5/15/26 at 7:47 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:Now THAT would have an impact!
Does this include their staffers?
re: DOJ drops fraud case vs Indian billionaire who hired Trump lawyer, promise 15k jobs in US
Posted by NC_Tigah on 5/15/26 at 7:39 am to RelicBatches86
quote:A terribly minor detail is that the DOJ didn't actually have a winnable case. Aside from that one minor point the New York Times article is interesting.
DOJ drops fraud case vs Indian billionaire who hired Trump lawyer, promise 15k jobs in US
The accusation is based on whistleblowers from a separate company who claim that Adani passed out bribes in India. The problem is, no charges have been registered in India, the Indians are not cooperating with the investigation at all, so the case has basically been on hold for a couple of years. This was a way to resolve it.
Adani will pay several million dollars in civil settlement restitutions along with the business promises detailed, the latter of which the DOJ said has no bearing on their findings.
Adani may be guilty as hell, but proving it would've been a different matter.
Roger Altman: Dr. Oz Saved My Life With a Heart Transplant
Posted by NC_Tigah on 5/15/26 at 6:42 am
Evercore’s Roger Altman: I wouldn’t be here today without Dr. Oz
Roger Altman, Evercore founder and senior chairman, and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz join ‘Squawk Box’ to discuss Altman’s history with Dr. Oz.
Apparently, Oz did the transplant in the late 1990's. Was just on TV. Interesting interaction. Altman is a longtime Dem supporter. 12 min video
Roger Altman, Evercore founder and senior chairman, and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz join ‘Squawk Box’ to discuss Altman’s history with Dr. Oz.
Apparently, Oz did the transplant in the late 1990's. Was just on TV. Interesting interaction. Altman is a longtime Dem supporter. 12 min video
quote:First, I am not aware of a single policy Massie has written.
This board would like 99% of the policies Massie writes.
Has he ever written policy?
But taking your post as I believe it was probably intended, and addressing Massie's viewpoints rather than written policy, it would not surprise me if I did not agree with his views 100%. The problem is when one element of his views conflicts with major legislation, he does everything in his power to attempt to obstruct that legislation.
For example, Northern and West Coast Republicans demanded that the OBBB be passed as an omnibus so they could add legislative perks to offset SALT issues for their constituents. The problem Johnson had was, if the Trump tax policies were not extended, we would revert back to Obama tax policy. That would be a huge win for Democrats and undercut the administration. But for republicans from high tax states, elimination of SALT deductions in the 2017 legislation was wildly unpopular, and in many cases, a reversion to Obama tax policy would be viewed as the lesser of two evils. So to attain OBBB passage, Mike Johnson went with his only option, the Omnibus option.
Now, frankly, I don't like Omnibus legislation anymore than Thomas Massie likes it. But under circumstances in which omnibus was the only mechanism to get this legislation passed, you have to take one for the team. Period!
Massie refused, and given the tight majority at play, his stubbornness threatened a catastrophic result. In the past, when there was a wider majority, or the GOP was in the minority, those Massie antics were nothing but inconsequential background noise. Given current house margins though, his vote now mattered.
As opposed to his moderate District GOP colleagues, whose reelection was dependent on items in the Omnibus, Massie faced no such elective consequence, regardless of his vote. Massie's position was/is that if his personal obstinance resulted in legislative failure, and the loss of 20 or 30 house seats, with the rise to power of Hakeem Jeffries and Democrat Socialists, that was just fine by Thomas Massie.
Well, it may be fine by Thomas Massie, but it ain't fine by me!
re: Massie loyalists will try to argue against this but, it's the truth.
Posted by NC_Tigah on 5/14/26 at 6:33 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Just as Alice "would have" ruled Wonderland.
Businesses would have stayed open.
quote:100%.
My opinion is that another couple of weeks without pumping hardly any fuel into the economy would have caused catastrophic and possibly irreversibly catastrophic damage and destruction. Thus the unfortunate yet critical move being discussed here was unavoidable.
Virtually unarguable.
quote:And, assuredly, the T 45 spending contributed. The question obviously is, what would have happened with no intervention?
That's why we're $39 trillion in debt.
re: Massie loyalists will try to argue against this but, it's the truth.
Posted by NC_Tigah on 5/14/26 at 5:49 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:NO!
Here we go with empty phrases and obfuscation.
Sorry Rog.
Your TDS-driven critical theory is going to get eviscerated here.
I hate it has come to this, but given the situation in March 2020, there is ZERO chance we were going to avoid depression without government compensation for unemployment.
re: Massie loyalists will try to argue against this but, it's the truth.
Posted by NC_Tigah on 5/14/26 at 5:42 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote::dope:
You have absolutely no clue how this works.
quote:
There wasnt one thing, it was a series of frickups and vote buying measures, which failed.
NOW PRIORITIZE THEM, NITWIT!
Prioritize your series of ""frickups"" 1-10 ...
Do take your time :rolleyes:
Popular
0













