Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Make Orwell Fiction Again
Biography:Warmest climes but nurse the cruellest fangs: the tiger of Bengal crouches in spiced groves of ceaseless verdure.
Interests:Cornucopian ends attained.
Occupation:Physician
Number of Posts:136690
Registered on:9/28/2003
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

This can’t be done
Someone always wins the lottery. The odds aren't great. The extremely lucky winner is solely who the public hears about

re: Tariffs cost states $200 billion

Posted by NC_Tigah on 2/12/26 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

They are all in 100% agreement
They were all in 100% agreement
Now then, rerun their calculations with massive trade deficits, massive budget deficits, and a massive national deficit.
quote:

hope she has a brother.
That's what I was thinking.

re: Tariffs cost states $200 billion

Posted by NC_Tigah on 2/12/26 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

Well I quit paying attention to you since the time you tried to prove China was paying for the tariffs imposed by Trump.
Good Lord!
I'm embarrassed for you. Damn dude! :lol:

re: Tariffs cost states $200 billion

Posted by NC_Tigah on 2/12/26 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

So you are measuring the effects of tariffs on import prices with debt to GDP. Wow.
That's your second self-own in two posts.

I really wish folks could back off the "I'm right -- everyone else is wrong BS," and just consider the contradictory viewpoint.

re: Tariffs cost states $200 billion

Posted by NC_Tigah on 2/12/26 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

You have to look at certain data points in CPI.
Point(s) in CPI.
You just self-owned.

re: Tariffs cost states $200 billion

Posted by NC_Tigah on 2/12/26 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

I will ask again. What is your measure?
GDP/debt. GDP only insofar as debt is going to increase regardless. What's your measure?

re: Tariffs cost states $200 billion

Posted by NC_Tigah on 2/12/26 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

We are talking about import prices BTW.
No sir!
We are talking about general economics!

re: Tariffs cost states $200 billion

Posted by NC_Tigah on 2/12/26 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

WTF are you talking about?
Seems pretty straightforward. Have "prices went up" as much as "prices had went up" prior to Liberation Day?

Do you know what "Liberation Day" is?

re: Tariffs cost states $200 billion

Posted by NC_Tigah on 2/12/26 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Prices have went up.
:dope:
"Have prices went up" as much as "prices had went up" prior to Liberation Day?
quote:

HailHailtoMichigan!
:cheers:

quote:

Without it, we’ll be less safe, less healthy and less able to fight climate change — all so the fossil fuel industry can make even more money.
Barack is an idiot. This post is not quite as stupid as a couple of his medical jewels. But, it's way way up there on the scale.

Thanks for posting.
quote:

LittleJerrySeinfield
Dense indeed.
Where is Massie's "Great Release"?
It's his time to Put Up or STFU.
quote:

She may not have said it, but I’d bet every nickel I own that her entitled arse believes it. She’s been raised in an environment that believes that. Her mother makes a lot of money lecturing about it.
Yep.
She may not have said it, but she was taught it.
quote:

Gates donating 99% of his fortune to Africa over the next 20 years
... and every effing 1¢ should be taxed.

Billions earned in the US, never tax exposed, now transferred untaxed to "interests" overseas. That, my friends, is not philanthropy. It's laundering.

quote:

How much do you think will be completely wasted?
Most of the money which is not worked back into the hands of Gates' friends and family will be wasted.

quote:

And the DOJ can't release the names? Lol
The DOJ was working to review and redact 3-4 million pages of materials for release. That's roughly the equivalent of 10,000 books. They weren't doing it fast enough for motormouth Massie and his Democrat buddies. So the DOJ complied, rushed to expedite the release, and ended up releasing redactions in a form allowing exposure of redacted material. Then the DOJ accidentally exposed several victims' names. Bondi caught Hell for that from the same congressional bitches who were pushing the release in the first place.

The files are now available for every member of Congress. Massie made big promises. He's seen the records. Why is he covering up for pedophiles?
quote:

He gave 6 yesterday from the two hours he had with the files.
No.
Ro Khanna gave 6 yesterday.
quote:

Lol, and the DOJ doesn't?
Relevance?
Massie said he'd release the names. Where are the names. Who is he covering for?
quote:

Trump
Said
He
Would
Release
Them
Then
Said
What,
Epstein?

They
Were
Released.
Massie
Said
He
Would
Release
The
Names.
Where
Are
The
Names?
quote:

Who exactly did Trump assign to "focusing" on "Election Security" back in 2020?
Perhaps the same folks who were looking after his personal security in Butler PA?

quote:

Maybe if it were someone like Massie
What has Massie gotten passed in Congress? Where was he in the Ashli Babbitt murder investigation? During the various lawfare efforts against Trump? etc. He's is a noisy nothingburger.

quote:

So you're happy with the people doing less
No.
I'm happy with folks working different projects with different focus (e.g., election security) simultaneously.