Started By
Message
re: Slow offenses vs fast offenses
Posted on 7/17/13 at 9:15 pm to DaleDenton
Posted on 7/17/13 at 9:15 pm to DaleDenton
Well sorry Bama/arky lineman don't condition
1
Posted on 7/17/13 at 9:15 pm to TTsTowel
Didn't UGA have Ogletree doing a suflex on a GT player last year too?
Posted on 7/17/13 at 9:16 pm to UMRealist
quote:Well played, brah.
Well sorry Bama/arky lineman don't condition
Posted on 7/17/13 at 9:44 pm to TTsTowel
Time's up. Fast offenses win this argument.
The thread is closed now.
The thread is closed now.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 9:46 pm to Landmass
High five, good job hurry up advocates 
Posted on 7/17/13 at 9:50 pm to Landmass
quote:
Bret Bulimia
You know that people with bulimia are skinny, right?
Posted on 7/17/13 at 9:53 pm to CatFan81
quote:
You know that people with bulimia are skinny, right?
He just keeps forgetting to vomit.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 9:53 pm to Landmass
Slow, methodical offenses are good if you have the talent of an LSU/Alabama. And even that is a bit of a stretch since Bama runs the spread and the hurry up when it suits them. LSU will try this year it sounds like (though I expect it to be shory lived since Cameron has no experience with it).
Anyone else is better if they run a fast-paced spread, assuming the coach of said team has a firm grasp of it.
In summary, Arkansas fuuuuuuuucked. They are going to try and beat Saban/Miles at their own game with a talent pool only capable of winning with the spread coached by a man who had no grasp of it.
Anyone else is better if they run a fast-paced spread, assuming the coach of said team has a firm grasp of it.
In summary, Arkansas fuuuuuuuucked. They are going to try and beat Saban/Miles at their own game with a talent pool only capable of winning with the spread coached by a man who had no grasp of it.
This post was edited on 7/17/13 at 9:56 pm
Posted on 7/17/13 at 9:54 pm to Roger Klarvin
The thread is closed. Fast offenses won the argument. 
Posted on 7/17/13 at 9:59 pm to Landmass
There is a reason fast offenses haven't won anything of importance.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:01 pm to CheeseburgerEddie
quote:
There is a reason fast offenses haven't won anything of importance.
WHAT does that have to do with player safety and the point of this thread!?
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:02 pm to Landmass
I realize this thread is intended to flame but everyone understands this is about being able.to substitute packages in according to the offensive package on the field. Both coaches are doing exactly what they are paid to do and that is look for every strategic advantage possible. Why are y'all crying g about him crying, nothing will change.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:03 pm to CheeseburgerEddie
Spread and/or hurry up offenses have played in 7 of the last 10 BCS title games and won 4 of them.
So in other words, you just made shite up and got called on it.
So in other words, you just made shite up and got called on it.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:04 pm to Roger Klarvin
Spread doesn't mean fast.
Name the 4 winners if you would please.
I take your lack of response as admission of your error
Name the 4 winners if you would please.
I take your lack of response as admission of your error
This post was edited on 7/17/13 at 10:20 pm
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:05 pm to Landmass
I don't like HUNH cause I like defense personally. There's already so many rules that protect offensive players and makes it harder on defenses it'd be nice to see a change of some type to help defenses. I don't mind HUNH, but I don't wanna watch basketball either.
Also, I'd hate seeing good players have to sit on the sidelines cause they can't sub in or defenses faking injuries to get a sub. Maybe they could add some "sub timeouts" you could use like a short timeout for subbing but you only get so many so you have to use the wisely against HUNH defenses.
Also, I'd hate seeing good players have to sit on the sidelines cause they can't sub in or defenses faking injuries to get a sub. Maybe they could add some "sub timeouts" you could use like a short timeout for subbing but you only get so many so you have to use the wisely against HUNH defenses.
This post was edited on 7/17/13 at 10:06 pm
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:05 pm to labamafan
quote:
Why are y'all crying g about him crying, nothing will change.
Because the jackass in T-Town will lobby the SEC office, which sits in his backyard and is staffed by alumni, to slow down ball placement. His argument is a complete farce but he will, at some point, force the game to slow down.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:06 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
It was also funny seeing some (let me stress some) Alabama fans claim that it was a clean play, after always bashing Nick Fairley for slamming players down. Nick Fairley never slammed down anyone like that. That Mizzou player could've easily broken his neck if he was shifted just a little more medial.
I dont think there were too many Bama fans that defended that suplex by Fanning. Kid apologized and I think had to write a letter. End of story
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:08 pm to MrBiriwa
quote:
I dont think there were too many Bama fans that defended that suplex by Fanning. Kid apologized and I think had to write a letter. End of story
Oh no! Not a letter!
Meanwhile, Trey Elston, from Ole Miss got suspended by the SEC office with no appeal possible for the Texas game.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:09 pm to Landmass
They just want to make subs without making a timeout, you know, like football has been played for a hundred years, right?
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:11 pm to NATidefan
quote:
I don't like HUNH cause I like defense personally.
Because you're a Bama fan.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News