Started By
Message
re: SEC dominance by decade
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:12 pm to ArmydawgMD
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:12 pm to ArmydawgMD
quote:
1 natty trumps no natties. Georgia>Auburn
They were robbed in the '83-'84 season.
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:14 pm to TriStateAreaFootball
lol since DVH tried to baby Tony we have won the sec 4 times, gone to omaha 3, and won a natty. Hope DVH can fire him up in two weeks cause this team needs it lol
but this thread is for football talk piggy
but this thread is for football talk piggy
This post was edited on 5/4/25 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:15 pm to BlindedMeWithScience
quote:
Also, did some Hog on this site piss you off?
Yes. I did it.
It goes back to this thread.
LINK
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:17 pm to VFL67
quote:
we have won the sec 4 times
You have won the SEC twice.
Edit - Ironically, the same number as Van Horn in that time frame.
quote:
Hope DVH can fire him up in two weeks cause this team needs it lol
Dave will. Arkansas has won 9/10 against UT in baseball.
This post was edited on 5/4/25 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:19 pm to VFL67
Bama should get the 90’s as well. We won the first SEC title game ever as well as a national championship title that year. Beat Florida in 92 then turned around and spanked the supposedly best team in the 90’s the hurricanes. I went to both games as a kid and still remember George Teague stripping that ball. It was amazing!
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:20 pm to TriStateAreaFootball
2 regular season titles and 2 sec tournament titles. Ill take a losing record to some washed coach any day of the week if it means continuing to have the program success that you've never had 

Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:29 pm to VFL67
quote:
2000s
King: LSU (2 natties, 3 conference titles)
Runner Up: Florida (2 natties, 3 conference titles)
Good lord you put LSU with their 2003 split title and their 2007 piece of shite 2 loss title ahead of Florida who went 13-1 and were undisputed champions?
That is some hella weak shite
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:34 pm to Pimphand
the logic was that from 2000-2009 LSU never really had any down time compared to the Zook era at Florida. But maybe that should be flipped
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:42 pm to VFL67
quote:Tennessee was 100% the better program in the 90s.
Tennessee had a winning record against bama in the 1990s. Also anyone who watched from 1990 to 1999 would say Tennessee was the better program.
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:52 pm to TriStateAreaFootball
lol
I mean, you ain’t wrong. Arkansas is as much of a thorn in Tennessee’s side as Georgia is right now. They really need to win it in Knoxville this year and stop the bleeding.
I mean, you ain’t wrong. Arkansas is as much of a thorn in Tennessee’s side as Georgia is right now. They really need to win it in Knoxville this year and stop the bleeding.
Posted on 5/4/25 at 1:01 pm to Pimphand
quote:
Good lord you put LSU with their 2003 split title
No split title in 2003. The BCS Championship was universally accepted as the College Football Champions by all Conferences prior to the season. The AP was part of the BCS Formula in determining the championship.
Posted on 5/4/25 at 1:15 pm to dalefla
Also realized I made a mistake, Tennessee won the SEC in 1990 too. That means that they had one more conference title than bama in that decade. So Tennessee was better that decade now undeniably along with its winning record head to head that decade
Posted on 5/4/25 at 2:03 pm to VFL67
quote:
-Auburn beat out LSU in 2010s because they played in more SEC titles 3>2
So LSU won both SEC Championship games they played in and played for a National Championship both years, won one and lost one. And Auburn beat them out? Come on
Posted on 5/4/25 at 2:21 pm to VFL67
1950 owned by OU . We are sec …. Are we gojng to have these same type of threads 50 years from now that exclude conference members ?
Posted on 5/4/25 at 2:47 pm to Run DMC
LSU played in two sec titles - won two sec titles - played in two natties - won one
Auburn played in 3 sec titles - won 2 sec titles - played in two natties - won one
difference is auburn played in 3 sec titles total and 3 is bigger than two. seems to make sense
Auburn played in 3 sec titles - won 2 sec titles - played in two natties - won one
difference is auburn played in 3 sec titles total and 3 is bigger than two. seems to make sense
Posted on 5/4/25 at 3:10 pm to VFL67
quote:
Auburn beat out LSU in 2010s because they played in more SEC titles 3>2
Nahhhh LSU vs Alabama was the “game of the century” for like 9 straight years. And LSU has the #1 team of all time in this decade as well.
Posted on 5/4/25 at 3:37 pm to Tammany Tom
Even if you count LSU's 2003 as an unblemished title, and I do. Florida still should be the king of the 2000s. Same number of championships and overall better win percentage in the decade, and the head-to-head Gators are 6 - 4 over the Tiggers.
Win Percentage Florida 76.9% 100 - 30 record
Win Percentage LSU 76.2%, 99 - 31 record.
For a cherry on top, LSU Heismans in the decade = Zero, Florida = Tebow.

Win Percentage Florida 76.9% 100 - 30 record
Win Percentage LSU 76.2%, 99 - 31 record.
For a cherry on top, LSU Heismans in the decade = Zero, Florida = Tebow.

Posted on 5/4/25 at 3:53 pm to Diesel88
i mean auburn also had cam newton and went undefeated. Its close but if you look at accolades they have auburn beat cause they have more division titles
and yall play in the same division nonetheless

and yall play in the same division nonetheless
Posted on 5/4/25 at 3:56 pm to VFL67
So Ole Miss is only team outside of Big 6 to have any life.
Will make it Big 7 soon.
Will make it Big 7 soon.
Popular
Back to top
