Started By
Message
re: Rule Changes you want to see
Posted on 12/28/20 at 12:20 am to FourThreeForty
Posted on 12/28/20 at 12:20 am to FourThreeForty
quote:
quote:
Go back to linemen only allowed 1 yard downfield on pass play
To all the ranters here, if this happens, offenses are handicapped by about 50%. You’ll love it.
Would make the game worth watching again. Boring hearing about 10 records getting shattered each game. X player passed for 2,000 yards in todays game breaking yet another record! How is that fun?
Posted on 12/28/20 at 1:48 am to Sput
quote:
So what happens when on 3rd and goal from the 8 the running back gets stuffed and “fumbles” the ball through the back of the end zone?
If no one recovers, ball should go to the spot of the fumble like every other forward fumble that goes out of bounds.
Posted on 12/28/20 at 2:41 am to War Eagle 777
Gotta start calling PI either less harsh or offset the foul. It’s way too catered to the receiver. Defense is almost pointless on air raid with that.
Posted on 12/28/20 at 4:14 am to War Eagle 777
1. Go back to the old rule of an "unintentional face mask" pull only being a 5 yard penalty.
2. Get rid of all the new "player safety" rules on special teams. It's almost impossible to block a kick or recover an onside kick now.
3. Get rid of the rule that if your helmet comes off you have to stop trying to make a play.
4. Give the replay booth a 2 minute time limit to make a decision. If they can't decide to overturn the call in that time then it's obviously not "conclusive".
2. Get rid of all the new "player safety" rules on special teams. It's almost impossible to block a kick or recover an onside kick now.
3. Get rid of the rule that if your helmet comes off you have to stop trying to make a play.
4. Give the replay booth a 2 minute time limit to make a decision. If they can't decide to overturn the call in that time then it's obviously not "conclusive".
Posted on 12/28/20 at 6:25 am to War Eagle 777
quote:
Rule Changes you want to see
1. Move kickoff back to 30 yard line. Let’s see some returns!
2. OT rule should change to each team receiving ball on 50 yard line, make the team “earn” getting into field goal range.
3. Bring back 5 yard incidental face mask. Not every face mask should be 15 yards and flagrant.
Posted on 12/28/20 at 6:29 am to War Eagle 777
Definitely change the OL downfield rule from 3 yds to 1 yd. A close second to OT starting field position, move it from the 25 back to the 40.
Posted on 12/28/20 at 6:29 am to War Eagle 777
Agree that the targeting rule needs to be tweaked as 99% are not intentional.
I’d like to see a Flagrant 1/Flagrant 2 system. A Flagrant 2 penalty would not result in disqualification which would be those 99% in my opinion.
I’d like to see a Flagrant 1/Flagrant 2 system. A Flagrant 2 penalty would not result in disqualification which would be those 99% in my opinion.
This post was edited on 12/28/20 at 6:31 am
Posted on 12/28/20 at 6:44 am to War Eagle 777
Change the half the distance penalty. It is vastly unfair to the team facing the goal line. If you are the team with its back to the goal line and you sustain a penalty it is only half the distance.
Here are a couple of examples and a solution:
Team A has the ball at the 2 yard line. Team B is on defense. Team A has an illegal procedure. Ball is moved back to the 7 yard line. Next play, Team B jumps offsides. Penalty is half the distance and the ball is placed at the 3 1/2 yard line. Same penalty on each team but Team A lost 1 1/2 yards in field position.
Team A has the ball at the 2 yard line. Team B is called for defensive holding and penalty is half the distance placing the ball at the one yard line. Team A on the next play is called for offensive holding. Ball is moved back to the 11 yard line. Same penalty on each team but Team A loses 9 yards in overall field position.
Totally wrong and the solution is simple. If the half the distance penalty is in effect for the team with its back to the goal line (regardless of whether they are on offense or defense) then penalty to the team facing the goal line would also either be half the distance away from the goal line or equal to what the penalty would be for the team with its back to the goal line.
So in example #1 above the first penalty would be 1 yard back to the 3 yard line. Second penalty would move the ball half the distance toward the goal line which would be the 1 1/2 yard line.
Example 2 would have the ball move back a half yard to the 1 1/2 yard line on the second penalty.
Thus the penalty would be applied equally in the same manner in that situation.
I have always felt like the team facing the goal line gets the short shrift on these situations.
Here are a couple of examples and a solution:
Team A has the ball at the 2 yard line. Team B is on defense. Team A has an illegal procedure. Ball is moved back to the 7 yard line. Next play, Team B jumps offsides. Penalty is half the distance and the ball is placed at the 3 1/2 yard line. Same penalty on each team but Team A lost 1 1/2 yards in field position.
Team A has the ball at the 2 yard line. Team B is called for defensive holding and penalty is half the distance placing the ball at the one yard line. Team A on the next play is called for offensive holding. Ball is moved back to the 11 yard line. Same penalty on each team but Team A loses 9 yards in overall field position.
Totally wrong and the solution is simple. If the half the distance penalty is in effect for the team with its back to the goal line (regardless of whether they are on offense or defense) then penalty to the team facing the goal line would also either be half the distance away from the goal line or equal to what the penalty would be for the team with its back to the goal line.
So in example #1 above the first penalty would be 1 yard back to the 3 yard line. Second penalty would move the ball half the distance toward the goal line which would be the 1 1/2 yard line.
Example 2 would have the ball move back a half yard to the 1 1/2 yard line on the second penalty.
Thus the penalty would be applied equally in the same manner in that situation.
I have always felt like the team facing the goal line gets the short shrift on these situations.
Posted on 12/28/20 at 6:55 am to War Eagle 777
Except for personal fouls, penalties shouldn't result in automatic first downs. If the penalty yardage nets a first down, then great. But an offense shouldn't be bailed out of a 3rd and 25 by a 15 yard PI penalty.
This post was edited on 12/28/20 at 6:56 am
Posted on 12/28/20 at 8:03 am to bamawriter
Agree with the half the distance penalty change two posts up ... makes it fair
On injuries. Must stay out till next first down. Not next possession. If you fake injury on second down , you are out till another first down.
Agree also on targeting. Too harsh. Second one out
On injuries. Must stay out till next first down. Not next possession. If you fake injury on second down , you are out till another first down.
Agree also on targeting. Too harsh. Second one out
Posted on 12/28/20 at 8:10 am to Hargojargo
Could you imagine losing your RB, QB or guard on a game winning drive because they got hit in the nuts or a defender fell on their ankle.
Posted on 12/28/20 at 8:25 am to XenScott
quote:
A kickoff through the uprights results is some type of points. Still a touch back
That's a CFL rule (1 point Rouge)
Posted on 12/28/20 at 8:28 am to War Eagle 777
I think there should be a rule about stupid QB's throwing a backwards pass, losing the ball to the other team, but somehow keeping possession.
Posted on 12/28/20 at 8:45 am to War Eagle 777
I think a good place to start would be to make the rules the same between pro and college football.
Posted on 12/28/20 at 8:55 am to War Eagle 777
Instant replay on turnovers or TD’s only. Or even better, adopt NFL replay rules.
Posted on 12/28/20 at 8:56 am to bamawriter
quote:. Then the pi would dominate long 3rd down
But an offense shouldn't be bailed out of a 3rd and 25 by a 15 yard PI penalty.
Posted on 12/28/20 at 8:57 am to KCM0Tiger
quote:
Can’t believe I had to scroll this far to find this one. Targeting might be one of the worst rules in all of sports. It should be addressed IMMEDIATELY
The hit we saw on Kyle Pitts this season was very typical of what was going on before targeting. So when you just say targeting should be eliminated that doesn't hold water. Kids' health out there needs to be protected, even from themselves at times.
Posted on 12/28/20 at 9:27 am to bamameister
If we are going to have targeting the way it is. Make it a penalty for the offensive player to lower his head. This would eliminate most targeting calls and we won’t to keep everyone safe right?
Posted on 12/28/20 at 9:37 am to D Tide
quote:
If we are going to have targeting the way it is. Make it a penalty for the offensive player to lower his head. This would eliminate most targeting calls and we won’t to keep everyone safe right?
How do you get all this in writing? Helmets hit every play so the wording is everything. It may be a violent sport at its core but the interpretation is everything. That's been most of the problem up to this point with the way the targeting rule is defined in games.
Posted on 12/28/20 at 9:53 am to swinetime
quote:
I think there should be a rule about stupid QB's throwing a backwards pass, losing the ball to the other team, but somehow keeping possession.
Damn, enough melt already. Stop bitching about the refs every game. They didn't lose ANY games for you this year. Get a real program and then you can bitch.
Popular
Back to top
