Started By
Message

Report: SEC, Big Ten Don't Have 'Much Desire' to Add FSU, Clemson, Other ACC Schools

Posted on 8/16/23 at 6:11 pm
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
7259 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 6:11 pm
Not Much Desire To Add ACC Schools


The rampant NCAA conference realignment finally appears to be slowing down.

According to CBS Sports' Dennis Dodd, the Big Ten and SEC are not looking to add top schools from the ACC anytime soon.

"Industry sources repeat that there is not much desire by either conference to add the likes of Clemson, Florida State, etc. Not that the ACC's seemingly 'ironclad' grant of rights agreement would allow such movement," Dodd stated.

By the 2024 season, the Big Ten and SEC will have a combined 34 teams, many of whom are among the most popular in the NCAA. Most recently, Washington and Oregon jumped from the Pac-12 to the Big Ten, following the footsteps of UCLA and USC.

With Arizona, Arizona State, and Utah following Colorado to join the Big 12, the Pac-12 is down to four teams: California, Stanford, Oregon State, and Washington State. Dodd noted that the Mountain West and the AAC are competing "for any combination" of the four remaining teams. Also, Stanford and Cal were under consideration to be added to the ACC, but both schools fell one vote shy of approval.

The constantly-shifting landscape in college sports is now raising concerns over media rights deals and revenue sharing. For example, Florida State president Rick McCullough said earlier this month that the school "will have to, at some point, consider very seriously leaving the ACC, unless there were a radical change to the revenue distribution."

Dodd noted that these concerns will likely lead to a decrease in movement across conferences for the time being.

"That makes it time to ask whether rightsholders are simply tapped out," Dodd stated. "A combination of reckless realignment and budget realities have forced networks to look at the bottom line."
Posted by Clark14
L.A.Hog
Member since Dec 2014
19076 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 6:14 pm to
Good, the acc should stay like it is unless they add someone, imo.
Posted by Ancient Astronaut
Member since May 2015
33000 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 6:16 pm to
Maybe in 10 years but not now
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37595 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 6:57 pm to
No duh.

I hope this silences the incessant expansion talk that has polluted this hallowed ground for the past six weeks.

May a curse fall upon the next asshat that starts an expansion thread ... and may anyone who starts a Clemson, FSU, UVA, NC State to the SEC thread, may they get a case of Harrod's Crotch.
Posted by LogansWalk
Olive Branch
Member since Nov 2018
118 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 7:20 pm to
You've got to wonder what could have been had the SEC not been in such a hurry to add Texas and Oklahoma.

Not that those two teams are bad additions but getting a Clemson, UNC, Virginia Tech or FSU would have made better sense - geographically - than either of the two Big 12 schools.

Just saying but it is what it is now.
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18070 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:24 pm to
No
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37595 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

but getting a Clemson, UNC, Virginia Tech or FSU would have made better sense

Posted by BigOrangeKen
Union City
Member since Oct 2015
1906 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 11:55 pm to
I don’t won’t Clemson in the SEC.
I am sure many SC fans don’t want them here either.
Posted by tigerbait2010
PNW
Member since May 2006
29147 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 12:09 am to
I don’t believe a word any of these assholes say

I can’t believe y’all actually listen to these assholes.

Zero doubt in my mind the SEC will go and poach UNC and UVA for new markets and massive brand names. Imho it’s not that Clemson and Florida state aren’t great brands but it ain’t new territory

Edit: when they do, who knows. But y’all are insane if you think sankey isn’t eye fricking UNC and UVA
This post was edited on 8/17/23 at 12:11 am
Posted by OleVaught14
Member since Jun 2019
6868 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 12:17 am to
quote:

Imho it’s not that Clemson and Florida state aren’t great brands but it ain’t new territory


New territory matters less now than last time new teams were added. Now it's about creating compelling matchups that will sell (i.e. FSU v. Tennessee sells a lot more than UVA v. Tennessee, etc.)
Posted by Cocotheape
Member since Aug 2015
3782 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 12:38 am to
SEC and Big 10 will put stuff out in the press like this every single day until the day they in fact do add new schools.

They want everyone to know that they are in fact not tortuously interfering in anyone’s conference contracts, they would never ever ever think of poaching a school from another conference. Innocence in appearance will have to do where innocence in fact likely doesn’t exist …

Of course, it’s all moot anyway, ACC schools have a grant of rights that no one has figured a plausible way out of yet. ESPN would rather not pay more for these schools vs the locked in ACC rate, and Fox probably sees diminishing returns now that the B10 stretches across 3 corners of the country.
Posted by Smokeyone
Maryville Tn
Member since Jul 2016
15879 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 1:19 am to
So the networks can’t afford it right now.
Posted by ColoradoElkHerd
USA
Member since May 2014
2191 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 2:20 am to
OU is a parasite. Dumb to add them.
Posted by TheRoarRestoredInBR
Member since Dec 2004
30280 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 3:10 am to
Both have promised to stop whoring..at least until that next time period for raping and pillaging.

Whores with hearts..the kind that donate to street beggars after a night of sucking and f@cking.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64976 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 5:12 am to
Josh Pate's sources come through yet again.

He said shortly after the latest round of conference realignment that certain powerbrokers took note of how unpopular the moves were from the perspective of the fans and kind of hinted that they were starting to pay attention to the negative backlash associated with conference expansion/realignment.

Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42392 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 5:25 am to
The acc is being relegated
Posted by AllInAllTheTime
Member since Apr 2019
336 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 5:36 am to
Screw TN and USUCK. No body cares what y’all want!
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
9910 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 5:41 am to
quote:

Not that those two teams are bad additions but getting a Clemson, UNC, Virginia Tech or FSU would have made better sense - geographically - than either of the two Big 12 schools


First, the geography is fine. Both schools are in the SE quadrant of the United States and are closer to newer sec teams like Missouri, Arkansas and A&M.

Second, Texas and to a lesser extent Oklahoma are so much bigger brands than FSU and Clemson it's not even worth debating.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30091 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 6:02 am to
Beside sankey and Tex/Ou, no one knew about their addition.

And you won’t know about the biggest moves. Things will just happen when they happen
Posted by GreyReb
Member since Jun 2010
3897 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 7:12 am to
quote:

You've got to wonder what could have been had the SEC not been in such a hurry to add Texas and Oklahoma. Not that those two teams are bad additions but getting a Clemson, UNC, Virginia Tech or FSU would have made better sense - geographically - than either of the two Big 12 schools. Just saying but it is what it is now.


Be patient for what? 2036? Texas and OU could get out in 2025. Would have had to wait another decade for those other schools.

Big Ten would have scooped up Texas and OU in a heartbeat.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter