Started By
Message

re: Pre 1970 was the Sugar Bowl a lot less prestigious?

Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:49 pm to
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27398 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:49 pm to
The Sugar was one of the 4 old line New Years's day bowls that also included the Cotton, Orange and the Grand Daddy of them all- Rose.

You have to understand, back in the 1940's and 1950's and even into the 1960's, the "National Champion" was declared many times prior to the bowl games. That being said, the Sugar has had more than its fair share of big games since 1934. Games that have pit#1 teams vs other highly ranked teams, ex: 1952 #3 Maryland( nat. champ for 1951 reg season) vs. #1 Tennessee ( also nat champ in many polls), 1960's Alabama claimed 2 of their national championships at Tulane stadium ( if memory recalls).
Posted by NickPapageorgio
Yuma, AZ
Member since Oct 2014
349 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:22 pm to
What a stupid topic. I'd expect this type of topic from a Arky moron.

Shame on you.

In the SEC, the Sugar Bowl is the most prestigious bowl and has been for a long, long time. Even prior to 1970 the SEC teams and fans wanted a Sugar Bowl invite first and foremost.

Now, a Texas guy probably wanted to go to the Cotton Bowl and that was the bowl all the little aggies and longhorns and sooners dreamed of seeing their team play in on New Years Day.

It's the effin Sugar Bowl man. Never go full retard.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55229 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:26 pm to
I guess you just showed me why YAOM
Posted by NickPapageorgio
Yuma, AZ
Member since Oct 2014
349 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:33 pm to
WAOM.....playing in the Sugar Bowl.

I don't care that it upsets you. I actually find it very amusing.

If it weren't for #WAOM then we'd have won the SEC.



Happy with a Sugar Bowl invite though. I've said for years that I just want to see the Rebels win the SEC and play in the Sugar Bowl before I die.

One down....
This post was edited on 12/7/15 at 4:34 pm
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55229 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:38 pm to
Doesn't upset me in the least, your response was just childish that's all

I'll be rooting for Ole Miss to win the Sugar bowl
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:58 pm to
Wow, OP. Another stupid Aggie.

Your sole national championship was secured at the 1940 Sugar Bowl.

LINK
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55229 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 5:02 pm to
Dumbass sip, you didn't even read the OP did you?

Stupid nut licker
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21506 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

Pre 1970 was the Sugar Bowl a lot less prestigious?


The selection of the SEC champion wasn't formalized until 1975.

Prior to then, you still had a lot of top ten matchups in the Sugar Bowl, but you were all too often missing the conference champion.

Here's the years from 1950 onwards that didn't feature the conference champion (conference champ listed first, then SEC team that went to Sugar instead)

'53: #13 Bama in Cotton Bowl, #8 Georgia Tech in Sugar Bowl
'55: #10 Ole Miss in Cotton Bowl, #7 Georgia Tech in Sugar Bowl
'57: #1 Auburn did not play in a bowl game because on probation due to pay for play scandal, #7 Ole Miss in Sugar Bowl
'59: #5 Georgia in Orange Bowl, #3 LSU in Sugar vs. #2 Ole Miss
'64: #1 Bama in Orange Bowl, #7 LSU in Sugar
'65: #4 Bama in Orange Bowl, unranked Florida in Sugar
'67: #2 Tennessee in Orange Bowl, unranked LSU in Sugar
'69: #11 Tennessee in Gator Bowl, #13 Ole Miss in Sugar
'71: #2 Bama in Orange Bowl, #4 Tennessee in Sugar
'72: #4 Bama in Cotton Bowl, No SEC team in Sugar
'74: #2 Bama in Orange Bowl, #18 Florida in Sugar

So a *lot* less prestigious?

Definitely less prestigious. Still a lot of top ten matchups and top teams. Mostly due to losing out on Bama 5 times during Bryant's prime.

The Orange Bowl landed a top 5 ranked SEC champion 6 times between 1950 and 1975. That had to suck for the Sugar Bowl and they finally fixed that in 1975. But it came at the price of losing the Big Eight champ as the Orange Bowl inked a similar deal in 1976.
This post was edited on 12/7/15 at 5:29 pm
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59448 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

Now, a Texas guy probably wanted to go to the Cotton Bowl and that was the bowl all the little aggies and longhorns and sooners dreamed of seeing their team play in on New Years Day.


I imagine the Sooners probably dreamed of the Orange Bowl more.
Posted by NickPapageorgio
Yuma, AZ
Member since Oct 2014
349 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 5:37 pm to
This is the best summary.

Orange, Sugar and Cotton were all considered to be the best of the best type bowls.

To say it was less prestigious than today or recently would be nonsense imo. It is a NY6 bowl today and it was a top 6 bowl back then any way you slice it.
Posted by bgtiger
Prairieville
Member since Dec 2004
11427 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

1985 Southwest Conference Champions 1986 Southwest Conference Champions 1987 Southwest Conference Champions 1991 Southwest Conference Champions 1992 Southwest Conference Champions 1993 Southwest Conference Champions 1998 Big 12 Conference Champions


LSU beat most of those Champions, and K-State was a cute upset.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55229 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

Definitely less prestigious. Still a lot of top ten matchups and top teams. Mostly due to losing out on Bama 5 times during Bryant's prime. The Orange Bowl landed a top 5 ranked SEC champion 6 times between 1950 and 1975. That had to suck for the Sugar Bowl and they finally fixed that in 1975. But it came at the price of losing the Big Eight champ as the Orange Bowl inked a similar deal in 1976.



Great insight
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21506 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Orange, Sugar and Cotton were all considered to be the best of the best type bowls.


Correct.

I think it's fair to say the Orange was slightly more prestigious though.

The Rose was locked in early to the Big Ten and what became the Pac 12. Interestingly enough, segregation (or rather lack thereof) played a role in the Big Ten/Pac 12 matchup. The Cotton Bowl integrated in 1948, the Orange in 1955 and the Sugar in 1956.

No doubt segregation also played a major role in the bowl selections for SEC schools prior to 1970. I read somewhere that LSU did not play a non-Southern team, at home or on the road, from 1942 to 1970. But that must not include bowl games as LSU played Syracuse in the '65 Sugar Bowl.

Here's an interesting article on that '65 Sugar Bowl:
LINK

quote:

How LSU and Syracuse Met in the 1965 Sugar Bowl

Seven days after the Alabama-Ole Miss football game, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Louisiana statute requiring racial segregation of public entertainment and athletic events was unconstitutional. Ernest N. Morial and A.P. Tureaud (Tureaud was first African American to attend class at LSU. Tureaud Hall is named for him), who argued the case for Horace Bynum, were the winning attorneys. Both were trailblazers in the civil rights' years and Morial, 14 years later, would become the first black mayor of New Orleans.

That decision removed a barrier that had hindered the Sugar Bowl from being the national game it had been before 1957. There was no reason New Orleans shouldn't pick up the bowl tempo again. Meanwhile, the Orange Bowl, in one of the most farsighted moves any postseason game ever took, changed its kickoff from early afternoon to prime television time-in the evening. The Rose Bowl, because of the time difference, had always started later than the other three bowls. That, combined with the tie-up between two of the country's most populous areas, had given Pasadena control of the ratings and a much larger TV contract than the others. Miami, no longer bound to the Big Eight, would now also be unopposed. Eventually, the money would be an inducement to help the Orange Bowl get the games it most desired. This was the real start of the television age for the bowls.


So -- that sheds a lot of light on what was holding the Sugar Bowl back.

Also, love this part of the story featuring Buddy D:

quote:

That left a great deal of leeway in the 1964 season. States-Item columnist Peter Finney and his Times-Picayune counterpart Buddy Diliberto felt one team filled both bills for the Sugar Bowl: Syracuse - the East's best team - featured an incredible running tandem in fullback Jim Nance and half-back Floyd Little. The two accounted for 1,779 yards and 25 touchdowns.
The problem was the Orangemen had two defeats and one game to go before the Bowl invitations would be extended. Finney and Diliberto continued to plug for Syracuse.

"For one thing," said Diliberto, "we thought it would be a dramatic way to end the segregation thing. Secondly, there was talk beginning then that New Orleans might be in line for a National Football League franchise. If there was any doubt about racial problems in the city, it could have endangered that move."


I didn't learn this history about the '65 Sugar Bowl until researching for this thread. Pretty amazing how much the world has changed in 50 years.

Now I know...
Posted by Shunface
Lafayette County Detention Center
Member since Jan 2013
4580 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

Pretty sure the Cotton bowl used to be bigger than the Sugar Bowl.


Tennessee Cotton Bowl Games: 6, record of 3-3

Ole Miss Cotton Bowl Games 5, record of 4-1
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55229 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 6:06 pm to
That's some real interesting reading



quote:

"For one thing," said Diliberto, "we thought it would be a dramatic way to end the segregation thing. Secondly, there was talk beginning then that New Orleans might be in line for a National Football League franchise. If there was any doubt about racial problems in the city, it could have endangered that move."
This post was edited on 12/7/15 at 6:08 pm
Posted by corneredbeast
02134
Member since Sep 2008
2164 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

Another thing to note for you youngsters, is that the bowls used to have much more independence.

They are still privately owned and they operate for a profit, but back before these huge TV contracts, bowls were motivated to invite which ever teams would be the most interesting matchup that would also bring the most spectators.

They were seen more like exhibition games between a "regional power" versus a team from a distant conference. Such match ups were much more rare during the regular season.

As a result, it was quite normal for some big name program to be invited to a bowl over a higher ranked team because the bowl wanted to make more money.

It was also normal for the big bowls to do some back room wheeling and dealing to get the match ups that would be most advantageous. Most of the time, the bowls saw themselves as being in competition, but sometimes deals were struck for the mutual benefit of the bowls.

All this talk about "which of the major bowls was more prestigious" is simply revisionist thinking. The Rose Bowl had the tie in between the Pac 10 and Big 10, which brought these two top conferences together for a big bowl.

Big 10 folks travelled well, probably motivated to get out of the cold and to visit California. Don't underestimate how star struck the rest of the country was about California, Los Angeles, and Hollywood. It was a top travel destination.

After the Rose, the other big bowls, Cotton, Sugar, and Orange, were all considered equal in prestige, depending on which teams they landed for that particular year.



A highly underrated post
Posted by Big EZ Tiger
Member since Jul 2010
24268 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 7:03 pm to
The Aggies have the most appearances in the Sweet'N Low Bowl.
Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

Because everyone knows the sugar bowl has always been prestigious.


Well, it was until last year anyway. Now it's just a bowl game that will never decide the national champion---like every other bowl game.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter