Started By
Message
re: Pre 1970 was the Sugar Bowl a lot less prestigious?
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:20 am to I-59 Tiger
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:20 am to I-59 Tiger
It wasn't a troll and makes perfect sense
Was the sugar bowl a less prestigious bowl pre 1970?
Was the sugar bowl a less prestigious bowl pre 1970?
1
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:21 am to Old Sarge
You asked about 45 years ago before you edited it. Guess what 2015-45 is?
Moron
Moron
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:22 am to Old Sarge
This thread is garbage and so are you.
Laughable; just like your little bro program.
Laughable; just like your little bro program.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:23 am to Bernie Moore
The SEC was a weak conference it was Bama and the dwarves
The only people that try to argue that the SEC pre 90 was a monster are people that ride the coat tails of Bama.
The only people that try to argue that the SEC pre 90 was a monster are people that ride the coat tails of Bama.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:24 am to VVega
The OP has NEVER BEEN EDITED, only the title since no one (including you) was reading the OP you are a dumbass
quote:
So it got me wondering if maybe the Sugar Bowl was a much less significant bowl game pre mid 60's?
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:25 am to VVega
Your a little flaming bitch that can't read the OP and then gets pissed when you look like a fool.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:25 am to Old Sarge
bullshite. Prove it.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:26 am to Old Sarge
Prior to 1970' the SEC champ played in the Sugar Bowl.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:26 am to sms151t
Cotton
January 2, 1950 #5 Rice 27 #16 North Carolina 13 notes
January 1, 1951 #4 Tennessee 20 #3 Texas 14 notes
January 1, 1952 #15 Kentucky 20 #11 TCU 7 notes
January 1, 1953 #10 Texas 16 #8 Tennessee 0 notes
January 1, 1954 #6 Rice 28 #13 Alabama 6 notes
January 1, 1955 Georgia Tech 14 #10 Arkansas 6 notes
January 2, 1956 #10 Mississippi 14 #6 TCU 13 notes
January 1, 1957 #14 TCU 28 #8 Syracuse 27 notes
January 1, 1958 #5 Navy 20 #8 Rice 7 notes
January 1, 1959 #10 TCU 0 #6 Air Force 0 notes
January 1, 1960 #1 Syracuse 23 #4 Texas 14 notes
January 2, 1961 #10 Duke 7 #7 Arkansas 6 notes
January 1, 1962 #3 Texas 12 #5 Mississippi 7 notes
January 1, 1963 #7 LSU 13 #4 Texas 0 notes
January 1, 1964 #1 Texas 28 #2 Navy 6 notes
January 1, 1965 #2 Arkansas 10 #6 Nebraska 7 notes
January 1, 1966 LSU 14 #2 Arkansas 7 notes
December 31, 1966 #4 Georgia 24 #10 SMU 9 notes
January 1, 1968 Texas A&M 20 #8 Alabama 16 notes
January 1, 1969 #5 Texas 36 #8 Tennessee 13 notes
January 1, 1970 #1 Texas 21 #9 Notre Dame 17 notes
Sugar
January 2, 1950 #2 Oklahoma 35 #9 LSU 0 notes
January 1, 1951 #7 Kentucky 13 #1 Oklahoma 7 notes
January 1, 1952 #3 Maryland 28 #1 Tennessee 13 notes
January 1, 1953 #2 Georgia Tech 24 #7 Mississippi 7 notes
January 1, 1954 #8 Georgia Tech 42 #10 West Virginia 19 notes
January 1, 1955 #5 Navy 21 #6 Mississippi 0 notes
January 2, 1956 #7 Georgia Tech 7 #11 Pittsburgh 0 notes
January 1, 1957 #11 Baylor 13 #2 Tennessee 7 notes
January 1, 1958 #7 Mississippi 39 #11 Texas 7 notes
January 1, 1959 #1 LSU 7 #12 Clemson 0 notes
January 1, 1960 #2 Mississippi 21 #3 LSU 0 notes
January 2, 1961 #2 Mississippi 14 Rice 6 notes
January 1, 1962 #1 Alabama 10 #9 Arkansas 3 notes
January 1, 1963 #3 Mississippi 17 #6 Arkansas 13 notes
January 1, 1964 #8 Alabama 12 #7 Mississippi 7 notes
January 1, 1965 #7 LSU 13 Syracuse 10 notes
January 1, 1966 #6 Missouri 20 Florida 18 notes
January 2, 1967 #6 Alabama 34 #3 Nebraska 7 notes
January 1, 1968 LSU 20 #5 Wyoming 13 notes
January 1, 1969 #9 Arkansas 16 #4 Georgia 2 notes
January 1, 1970 #13 Mississippi 27 #3 Arkansas 22 notes
If you compare the rankings of the participating schools, the Sugar typically had higher ranked participants. Before tie ins, I would think this an indicator of the more "prestigious" being the Sugar
January 2, 1950 #5 Rice 27 #16 North Carolina 13 notes
January 1, 1951 #4 Tennessee 20 #3 Texas 14 notes
January 1, 1952 #15 Kentucky 20 #11 TCU 7 notes
January 1, 1953 #10 Texas 16 #8 Tennessee 0 notes
January 1, 1954 #6 Rice 28 #13 Alabama 6 notes
January 1, 1955 Georgia Tech 14 #10 Arkansas 6 notes
January 2, 1956 #10 Mississippi 14 #6 TCU 13 notes
January 1, 1957 #14 TCU 28 #8 Syracuse 27 notes
January 1, 1958 #5 Navy 20 #8 Rice 7 notes
January 1, 1959 #10 TCU 0 #6 Air Force 0 notes
January 1, 1960 #1 Syracuse 23 #4 Texas 14 notes
January 2, 1961 #10 Duke 7 #7 Arkansas 6 notes
January 1, 1962 #3 Texas 12 #5 Mississippi 7 notes
January 1, 1963 #7 LSU 13 #4 Texas 0 notes
January 1, 1964 #1 Texas 28 #2 Navy 6 notes
January 1, 1965 #2 Arkansas 10 #6 Nebraska 7 notes
January 1, 1966 LSU 14 #2 Arkansas 7 notes
December 31, 1966 #4 Georgia 24 #10 SMU 9 notes
January 1, 1968 Texas A&M 20 #8 Alabama 16 notes
January 1, 1969 #5 Texas 36 #8 Tennessee 13 notes
January 1, 1970 #1 Texas 21 #9 Notre Dame 17 notes
Sugar
January 2, 1950 #2 Oklahoma 35 #9 LSU 0 notes
January 1, 1951 #7 Kentucky 13 #1 Oklahoma 7 notes
January 1, 1952 #3 Maryland 28 #1 Tennessee 13 notes
January 1, 1953 #2 Georgia Tech 24 #7 Mississippi 7 notes
January 1, 1954 #8 Georgia Tech 42 #10 West Virginia 19 notes
January 1, 1955 #5 Navy 21 #6 Mississippi 0 notes
January 2, 1956 #7 Georgia Tech 7 #11 Pittsburgh 0 notes
January 1, 1957 #11 Baylor 13 #2 Tennessee 7 notes
January 1, 1958 #7 Mississippi 39 #11 Texas 7 notes
January 1, 1959 #1 LSU 7 #12 Clemson 0 notes
January 1, 1960 #2 Mississippi 21 #3 LSU 0 notes
January 2, 1961 #2 Mississippi 14 Rice 6 notes
January 1, 1962 #1 Alabama 10 #9 Arkansas 3 notes
January 1, 1963 #3 Mississippi 17 #6 Arkansas 13 notes
January 1, 1964 #8 Alabama 12 #7 Mississippi 7 notes
January 1, 1965 #7 LSU 13 Syracuse 10 notes
January 1, 1966 #6 Missouri 20 Florida 18 notes
January 2, 1967 #6 Alabama 34 #3 Nebraska 7 notes
January 1, 1968 LSU 20 #5 Wyoming 13 notes
January 1, 1969 #9 Arkansas 16 #4 Georgia 2 notes
January 1, 1970 #13 Mississippi 27 #3 Arkansas 22 notes
If you compare the rankings of the participating schools, the Sugar typically had higher ranked participants. Before tie ins, I would think this an indicator of the more "prestigious" being the Sugar
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:26 am to Old Sarge
And you got your answer.
No
Ole Miss just used to actually be good at football. That's it, that's the answer.
No
Ole Miss just used to actually be good at football. That's it, that's the answer.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:27 am to Bernie Moore
quote:
Prior to 1970' the SEC champ played in the Sugar Bowl.
SEC Champ didn't automatically play in the Sugar until 1975.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:28 am to VVega
Bull shite. Prove it.
Pre 2015-45 = PRE 1970 Not "70s, 80s, 90s, and was still a pretty big deal even in the 00s."
Why can't you just admit you answered without reading the OP
quote:
quote: Sugar bowl was a huge deal in the 70s, 80s, 90s, and was still a pretty big deal even in the 00s.
quote:
You asked about 45 years ago before you edited it. Guess what 2015-45 is? Moron
Pre 2015-45 = PRE 1970 Not "70s, 80s, 90s, and was still a pretty big deal even in the 00s."
Why can't you just admit you answered without reading the OP
This post was edited on 12/7/15 at 8:29 am
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:29 am to Old Sarge
No, you flamed me by calling into question personal life comparisons... And quickly backed off that avenue when I called your bluff.
Then you edit the OP and change your tactic.
My first response to your troll thread was legitimate.
My only mistake is continuing to participate in your rewriting of history; both in Sugar bowl history and the history of this thread.
You can't win arguing with a troll like you.
Then you edit the OP and change your tactic.
My first response to your troll thread was legitimate.
My only mistake is continuing to participate in your rewriting of history; both in Sugar bowl history and the history of this thread.
You can't win arguing with a troll like you.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:30 am to Old Sarge
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:30 am to VVega
quote:
Then you edit the OP and change your tactic.
You are a liar
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:32 am to VVega
quote:
calling into question personal life comparisons... And quickly backed off that avenue when I called your bluff.
Bluff? You are young and not that bright
Failure to admit that you were wrong proves this
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:36 am to Old Sarge
quote:
This post was edited at 12/7 at 8:00 am
You originally asked about 45 years ago. If you were too stupid to realize that was 1970, that's only your own damn fault.
The real answer is that you moved the goal posts; as trolls always do.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:37 am to Old Sarge
I have shite to do, enjoy your Ole Miss troll thread and your trip to Nashville; assuming you can afford it.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:38 am to VVega
Pre 45 years ago is pre 1970
How hard is that for you to understand? The OP is very clear; it is referring to to history of the sugar bowl BEFORE 1970
Only the title was edited
You then went on to self proclaim yourself as a dummy
How hard is that for you to understand? The OP is very clear; it is referring to to history of the sugar bowl BEFORE 1970
Only the title was edited
quote:
Title is edited since dummies can't take the time to read the OP.
You then went on to self proclaim yourself as a dummy
This post was edited on 12/7/15 at 8:42 am
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:43 am to VVega
quote:
VVega
Wow. For a doctor you're really quite emotional.
Was it an honorary degree?
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News