Started By
Message
re: Next two teams to add to the SEC?
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:16 am to Mister Tee
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:16 am to Mister Tee
Get rid of A&M and Missouri - addition by subtraction.
1
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:17 am to Mister Tee
Good of auburn to make the pitch to okie by losing big in the sugar.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:29 am to Yellerhammer5
quote:
Yellerhammer5
Next two teams to add to the SEC?
Get rid of A&M and Missouri - addition by subtraction.
This. It's embarrassing that we let them in in the first place TBQH.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:38 am to GimmeOneSEC
Florida State will never get another opportunity for those mentioning them.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 1:27 pm to dlc83
quote:
UNC is the epicenter of the ACC. Why would it want to come to the SEC to serve at the alter of Alabama?
Football is irrelevant, however. What would be great is the split SEC basketball into divisions again and you would have UK, UNC, Florida, Tenn., Vandy, Georgia, Mizzou (or Auburn in case of realignment) and someone else I'm forgetting. That would be a heck of a battle every year.
Plus, everyone knows that once Coach K retires, Duke will slide back into the second tier of college b-ball. UNC will dominate the ACC most years whereas in the SEC with UK, it would be a yearly battle no matter who the coaches are.
This post was edited on 12/13/16 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:49 pm to BigBlue8Titles
Football = King in the SEC
Alabama = King of Football; SO
Alabama rules the SEC
UNC would never come to a league where basketball is a distant 2nd (some here argue 3rd) sport.
UK and UNC don't need to be in the same league to be rivals.
Alabama = King of Football; SO
Alabama rules the SEC
UNC would never come to a league where basketball is a distant 2nd (some here argue 3rd) sport.
UK and UNC don't need to be in the same league to be rivals.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:50 pm to Mister Tee
can't we enjoy Christmas and some bowl games before we start in on this bullshite?
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:13 pm to Mister Tee
I think we should add a minus Mssouri and a minus Texas A&M.
The math looks to work.
The math looks to work.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:13 pm to Mister Tee
I think we should add a minus Mssouri and a minus Texas A&M.
The math looks to work.
The math looks to work.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:32 pm to Numberwang
First of all OU would join the Big 10 if they decided to leave the Big 12 and Okie State would be a part of the deal. That's just how they roll there. The Big 10 schools make the most tv money. That would be their first choice as it was for Mizzou as well. I am sure the SEC would be OU's second choice if they could not work out a deal with the Big10(say Big 10 doesn't want OSU). As far as UNC joining, well, I am uncertain they would have the necessary commitment to football. Basketball does make tv money, but it pales in comparison to the tv money football brings in.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:37 pm to Mister Tee
Clemson, Louisville, and UNC.
Pick 2 of 3.
Pick 2 of 3.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 4:46 pm to Mister Tee
1. Expanding to 14 was an awful idea. We should have stayed at 12, especially if we are never going to have 9 conference games.
2. Anybody who suggests expanding further to 16 teams needs to be banned from the secrant.
2. Anybody who suggests expanding further to 16 teams needs to be banned from the secrant.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 4:47 pm to Numberwang
Agreed 100%. We need to add negative two teams. We should do that by Templing Mizzou and aTm out of the conference. I'm not sure whether or not that's allowed under the SEC bylaws but we should do it anyway.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 4:49 pm to dbuchanon
quote:
Uh.... you just responded to yourself. First.
Forgot to use his alter to give a vote of support to himself.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 7:07 pm to Mizz-SEC
Get rid of 2 teams that don't matter. That would mean 2 teams from states that have 2 SEC teams. AL, TN, or MS.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 7:09 pm to Mister Tee
I want Oklahoma and Oklahoma State. That way Bama and Auburn could go to the east and keep all rivalries intact
Posted on 12/13/16 at 7:09 pm to Mister Tee
Oklahoma is going to be looking for an out soon, as well as Kansas and West Virginia.
The Big 12 is slowly becoming the SWC again.
The Big 12 is slowly becoming the SWC again.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 7:11 pm to Chill98
Missouri and South Carolina are two teams I'd remove first. Both joined the SEC under the presumption of "potential" but neither truly add anything.
IMO
IMO
Posted on 12/13/16 at 7:12 pm to Mister Tee
North Carolina for basketball would be great. Adding them to SEC East doesn't solve the problem for making that division more competitive.
Oklahoma would be a nice get, and I would love to see Stoops melt two/three times per season.
Oklahoma would be a nice get, and I would love to see Stoops melt two/three times per season.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 7:20 pm to mtheob17
there is no set of circumstances where unc or virginia even consider joining the sec ...
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News