| Favorite team: | Florida |
| Location: | Planet earth, Milky Way Galaxy |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 2682 |
| Registered on: | 8/3/2016 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: National Cathedral being broadcast nationally with a female priest overseeing Christmas.
Posted by UFFan on 12/25/25 at 3:39 pm to _Hurricane_
Honestly, I don’t see why a religion that has unmanly teachings like “turn the other cheek” shouldn’t have women pastors.
re: Sister’s jackass boyfriend just told my kids Santa isn’t real
Posted by UFFan on 12/25/25 at 1:07 pm to TheTigress
Whatever. Who fricking cares. People shouldn’t believe in those stupid fairy tales.
Cool it with the anti-Semitism, bro. Some of the Jewish people on this website might be upset at how you’re arguing the Old Testament doesn’t matter.
re: National Cathedral being broadcast nationally with a female priest overseeing Christmas.
Posted by UFFan on 12/25/25 at 12:40 pm to _Hurricane_
It’s a moot point to me anyway since I’m atheist. But I’m not sure it’s ever really explicitly stated in the Bible that priests have to be male. That’s just a Catholic tradition stemming from the fact that Jesus (assuming he existed at all) was male.
All 365 days of the year are already paid days off for federal employees. What difference does one more paid day off make?
re: Which was worse? Qb not running for a first or the WR dropping the pass…
Posted by UFFan on 12/19/25 at 8:23 pm to CatsGoneWild
Not taking the 1st down plus about 15 more yards.
re: Rooting for Tulane…
Posted by UFFan on 12/19/25 at 10:01 am to Hangover Haven
I find the spread to be kind of surprising with Ole Miss' chaos.
So, would the spread be 31.5 without Ole Miss' chaos? Or are the books just not adjusting the spread at all due to Ole Miss' chaos?
So, would the spread be 31.5 without Ole Miss' chaos? Or are the books just not adjusting the spread at all due to Ole Miss' chaos?
It is really fair for 18 year olds to have to play against guys in their mid-twenties? It can already be difficult enough for them to compete against 21 year olds.
re: The 2006 Rose Bowl popped up in my YT feed today
Posted by UFFan on 12/15/25 at 10:19 am to TigersHuskers
Didn't Nebraska help lead to this by being one of the first teams to switch conferences?
He is getting pretty old at this point. I wouldn’t be shocked if he retires after this year. I pretty much expect that he’ll retire within the next 3 or 4 years.
Still, if he retires, it should be due to his age. Not due to one mediocre season.
Still, if he retires, it should be due to his age. Not due to one mediocre season.
re: O. J. Simpson, Something I had forgotten long ago
Posted by UFFan on 12/14/25 at 11:18 am to TigerintheNO
There are still plenty of bad NFL draft picks today. And punters and FG kickers used to be drafted higher than they are today. The reason why kickers aren’t drafted as high today is ironically because of the greatly increased quality of punters and FG kickers. That’s made most punters and FG kickers pretty interchangeable with each other, so there’s really no need to draft one before the 5th or 6th round.
The SEC basically splits playoff money equally. So it would be the amount of money the SEC gets from having an extra team in the playoffs, divided by 16.
If you want to get the number to the decimal point, I think the SEC now allows teams to keep a slightly bigger than 1/16 share of the revenue from their own bowl games and possibly playoff appearances, due to a problem a few years ago where some 6-6 SEC teams were considering refusing bowl bids because they lost money from the bowl games. Due to the fact that the revenue from the game would be evenly split 16 ways while they'd have to pay 100% of their own expenses to go to the game.
If you want to get the number to the decimal point, I think the SEC now allows teams to keep a slightly bigger than 1/16 share of the revenue from their own bowl games and possibly playoff appearances, due to a problem a few years ago where some 6-6 SEC teams were considering refusing bowl bids because they lost money from the bowl games. Due to the fact that the revenue from the game would be evenly split 16 ways while they'd have to pay 100% of their own expenses to go to the game.
re: PAC-12 2026 Schools
Posted by UFFan on 12/9/25 at 5:52 pm to TomRollTideRitter
The Big Ten actually only changed its official name to the Big Ten just 3 years before PSU joined the conference. The Big Ten was officially called the Western Conference until 1987 even though nobody really had called them that name probably since WW2. So the Big Ten really should have changed the name to Big 11 when PSU joined since they had the name Big Ten for such a short period of time. But they didn't.
re: PAC-12 2026 Schools
Posted by UFFan on 12/9/25 at 5:49 pm to StrongOffer
Yes, and I don't understand why they didn't just completely merge with the MWC, even if they kept the PAC-12 name.
This isn't 1985 anymore. An 8 team conference can't function anymore.
This isn't 1985 anymore. An 8 team conference can't function anymore.
They're under the ACC GOR in their non-football sports. And IIRC, the GOR gives the ACC the right to all ND athletic events (except for football), no matter how many other teams are at the event. That would be problematic enough for basketball. But it would be even more problematic for something like track and field, where the ACC would then have the TV rights to the entire Big Ten track championships if just one ND runner make the track championship. And, as stupid as it sounds, the BTN basically has to air stuff that nobody watches like track and field championships just so that TV providers won't drop the BTN from roughly mid-March until late August of every year.
The legal validity of the GOR isn't really determined since FSU, Clemson, and UNC settled out of court. But if the GOR is legally valid, there's really no way the Big Ten can take ND.
The legal validity of the GOR isn't really determined since FSU, Clemson, and UNC settled out of court. But if the GOR is legally valid, there's really no way the Big Ten can take ND.
The in season tournament is stupid and needs to be abolished
Posted by UFFan on 12/9/25 at 4:59 pm
So your team gets penalized for doing well in the "group play" games by having 2 tough opponents added to your schedule? With both of the games being on the road, in the Heat's case?
It’s because the ACC would have been furious if they didn’t get a team.
The committee actually could have easily solved that problem by putting Duke in the playoffs over JMU. As I discussed in my previous post.
But instead the committee ends up seeming retarded by letting a #60ish JMU into the playoffs rather than a #35ish Duke, and jumping Miami over ND when both are idle.
The committee actually could have easily solved that problem by putting Duke in the playoffs over JMU. As I discussed in my previous post.
But instead the committee ends up seeming retarded by letting a #60ish JMU into the playoffs rather than a #35ish Duke, and jumping Miami over ND when both are idle.
re: CFP Playoff Seedings
Posted by UFFan on 12/7/25 at 11:54 am to NickPapageorgio
That really is what people are missing here. Duke should be in the playoffs rather than JMU.
To get into more detail, JMU’s 14 point loss to 8-4 Louisville really shouldn’t be considered an upset, and Louisville really should be ranked ahead of JMU.
Louisville didn’t directly play Duke. But Louisville went 4-4 in the ACC, and Duke beat 3 of the 4 teams who Louisville lost to.
So Duke should be ranked ahead of Louisville, who in turn should be ranked ahead of JMU.
Of course Duke does not belong in the playoffs either. But JMU belongs in the playoffs even less than Duke does.
To get into more detail, JMU’s 14 point loss to 8-4 Louisville really shouldn’t be considered an upset, and Louisville really should be ranked ahead of JMU.
Louisville didn’t directly play Duke. But Louisville went 4-4 in the ACC, and Duke beat 3 of the 4 teams who Louisville lost to.
So Duke should be ranked ahead of Louisville, who in turn should be ranked ahead of JMU.
Of course Duke does not belong in the playoffs either. But JMU belongs in the playoffs even less than Duke does.
re: CFP Playoff Seedings
Posted by UFFan on 12/7/25 at 11:44 am to higgs_boson
It’s presumably because Duke upset UVA and the ACC fans were going to be furious if no ACC team made it.
UVA would have been 11-2 and would have had a decent enough resume to make it over JMU and Tulane. Duke on the other is 8-5, including a head to head loss to Tulane.
UVA would have been 11-2 and would have had a decent enough resume to make it over JMU and Tulane. Duke on the other is 8-5, including a head to head loss to Tulane.
re: CFP Playoff Seedings
Posted by UFFan on 12/7/25 at 11:41 am to dawgfan24348
The committee moved Alabama ahead of ND last week just to avoid the appearance that they’d be dropping Bama out of the playoffs due to a CCG game loss if BYU beat Texas Tech.
However, they actually wouldn’t have been punishing Bama for a CCG game loss in that scenario, and instead would have been moving BYU into Alabama’s playoff spot.
I’m not even sure the committee last week gave any thought to the possibility that Duke would beat UVA and they’d have to invite Miami as a substitute ACC team.
This has resulted in a ridiculous scenario where Alabama has passed ND with the new data being that Alabama barely beat 5-7 Auburn and lost by 21 to UGA, while ND creamed an admittedly bad Stanford team. And then Miami didn’t pass ND with their fairly impressive rout of Pitt, but passed ND when both teams were bye.
However, they actually wouldn’t have been punishing Bama for a CCG game loss in that scenario, and instead would have been moving BYU into Alabama’s playoff spot.
I’m not even sure the committee last week gave any thought to the possibility that Duke would beat UVA and they’d have to invite Miami as a substitute ACC team.
This has resulted in a ridiculous scenario where Alabama has passed ND with the new data being that Alabama barely beat 5-7 Auburn and lost by 21 to UGA, while ND creamed an admittedly bad Stanford team. And then Miami didn’t pass ND with their fairly impressive rout of Pitt, but passed ND when both teams were bye.
re: Of course Bama should be in the CFP. You shouldn't be penalized because you ...
Posted by UFFan on 12/6/25 at 11:05 pm to GoldenDawg
A
Popular
0









