Started By
Message
Next two teams to add to the SEC?
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:23 am
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:23 am
Obviously, Oklahoma and North Carolina.
Very superior teams in Football and Basketball.
Perfect for the SEC.
We would give those State's $52,000,000 per year.
What is the problem?
Very superior teams in Football and Basketball.
Perfect for the SEC.
We would give those State's $52,000,000 per year.
What is the problem?
28
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:25 am to Mister Tee
We would love to have them.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:32 am to Mister Tee
Two solid choices. approve
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:32 am to Mister Tee
SEC Football spreads out to SEC Basketball as well.
North Carolina and Oklahoma would benefit.
North Carolina and Oklahoma would benefit.
This post was edited on 12/13/16 at 2:54 am
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:33 am to Mister Tee
quote:
Obviously, Oklahoma and North Carolina.
Those would obviously be the ideal schools for a ton of reasons.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:38 am to Mister Tee
quote:
We would love to have them.
Uh.... you just responded to yourself. First.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:50 am to dbuchanon
Give me some other options for $52,000,000 a year.
We have to add two more teams for this.
Let's just get it over with and add two more teams.
Stop trying to drag it out.
These are the numbers.
We have to add two more teams for this.
Let's just get it over with and add two more teams.
Stop trying to drag it out.
These are the numbers.
This post was edited on 12/13/16 at 2:52 am
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:52 am to Mister Tee
In several of the many past discussions on this topic, wasn't the Oklahoma legislature an issue? As in they won't allow OU and OSU to be in separate conferences?
I like the choices, but there were too many roadblocks to getting Oklahoma.
I like the choices, but there were too many roadblocks to getting Oklahoma.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:01 am to p0845330
frick Oklahoma politics.
Eastern and Western Rome broke free from one another.
They both continued to be bad arse Empires...separately.
What is the problem?
Survival of the fittest.
At least the SEC shares it's spoils.
Eastern and Western Rome broke free from one another.
They both continued to be bad arse Empires...separately.
What is the problem?
Survival of the fittest.
At least the SEC shares it's spoils.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:06 am to Mister Tee
I would like UVA and UNC. For one, I don't think you get UNC, without UVA, or Duke.
No, doesn't add much, if anything to football, but basketball and baseball get even better. Plus it puts the SEC one, maybe two schools away from sponsoring men's soccer. And would have two elite teams.(know nothing of UK and USC soccer)
I would also be happy with Duke and UNC.
I say all this hating UNC.
No, doesn't add much, if anything to football, but basketball and baseball get even better. Plus it puts the SEC one, maybe two schools away from sponsoring men's soccer. And would have two elite teams.(know nothing of UK and USC soccer)
I would also be happy with Duke and UNC.
I say all this hating UNC.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:10 am to Mister Tee
quote:
frick Oklahoma politics.
Virginia politics is the only reason VA Tech is in the ACC. UVA sure as hell didn't want them. Politics forced UVA to approve Tech. Politics go a long way.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:16 am to Tiger Live2
I really don't see what Duke or Virginia has to to do with this.
They are never coming to the SEC. Let's be real.
The SEC right now has $52,000,000 to spend each for two Universities ($104,000,000).
We seriously need to get to 16 members.
Would your University take, or leave, this situation right now?
They are never coming to the SEC. Let's be real.
The SEC right now has $52,000,000 to spend each for two Universities ($104,000,000).
We seriously need to get to 16 members.
Would your University take, or leave, this situation right now?
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:25 am to Tiger Live2
I think Miami would bite with Richt.
He knows the SEC, and he is a popular coach with us.
Why not?
He knows the SEC, and he is a popular coach with us.
Why not?
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:39 am to Mister Tee
Clemson but Auburn won't allow it. Swinney owns that arse
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:40 am to Mister Tee
Idc who as long as we kick out Mizzou
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:44 am to Mister Tee
I'd rather kick out the latest 2 than add anymore
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:52 am to Mister Tee
I say UVA because obviously if the SEC expands, they want to want to add VA and NC.(assuming state size still matters at that point)
UVA and Duke are also traditional rivals for UNC to bring with them.
Miami and Clemson are no go's due to their state. Honestly, FSU and Clemson I think would be best, but both will never happen.
UVA and Duke are also traditional rivals for UNC to bring with them.
Miami and Clemson are no go's due to their state. Honestly, FSU and Clemson I think would be best, but both will never happen.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:57 am to Tiger Live2
Tulane 
Posted on 12/13/16 at 4:01 am to Hullabaloo
quote:
Tulane
Selfishly I like this idea, assuming game day traffic, it would only take me about 25 minutes, to get to my parking lot, minutes from the Dome.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 4:06 am to Mister Tee
The problem with Okie is we really need two eastern teams added.
UNC seems natural. UVA or VA Tech would get Virginia as well. Really doesn't make sense that the SEC doesn't already have a Virginia school.
Doubt Florida, Georgia, Kentucky or USCe are gonna go for Fla St, the U, Clempson, Louisville or GA Tech.
I guess you could swap Mizzou & Auburn if you add Okie.
Who else?
UNC seems natural. UVA or VA Tech would get Virginia as well. Really doesn't make sense that the SEC doesn't already have a Virginia school.
Doubt Florida, Georgia, Kentucky or USCe are gonna go for Fla St, the U, Clempson, Louisville or GA Tech.
I guess you could swap Mizzou & Auburn if you add Okie.
Who else?
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News