Started By
Message
My money is on Sark or Kiffin for the Bama job
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:15 pm
And before you Texas fans say we've got more money, that's true, but it's not about how much you have. It's about how much you're willing to spend, and I promise you Alabama is willing to spend more. That's why you were never able to hire Saban away from them in the first place. Alabama will go with the same "we're only hiring him if he was one of Bear's boys" mindset that caused them to wander in the wilderness for years post Bryant.
15
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:16 pm to Lucado
Lanning to Bama
Kiffin to Oregon
I jump off a cliff
Kiffin to Oregon
I jump off a cliff
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:16 pm to Lucado
sauces are saying Dan Lanning all but a done deal.
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:16 pm to REBEL5 AC
I think it’s Lanning.
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:17 pm to REBEL5 AC
Sounds like 3 really good things there REB.
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:17 pm to Lucado
Jimbo.
NC title
Comes cheap
Is not impacted be expectations
First assistant to beat Saban
NC title
Comes cheap
Is not impacted be expectations
First assistant to beat Saban
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:17 pm to UnluckyTiger
Lanning triple post for the win.
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:17 pm to Lucado
Sark would be a dumb hire. They could get him, but it would be expensive, and his career is super pedestrian.
I think they should get Lanning or Ryans.
I think they should get Lanning or Ryans.
This post was edited on 1/10/24 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:17 pm to SouthernInsanity
touche
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:17 pm to Lucado
Pete Golding
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:18 pm to Lucado
You want those things to happen because you have a dud-arse coach but the reality is it’s DeBoer or Lanning.
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:18 pm to Lucado
quote:
And before you Texas fans say we've got more money, that's true, but it's not about how much you have. It's about how much you're willing to spend, and I promise you Alabama is willing to spend more.
If Bama wants to spend $15 million on Sark, have at it.
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:18 pm to Lucado
I don't think Bama can spend more money than Texas, but IF Sark were to leave, I think it would be because of how much the money coffers love to meddle and have a "say so". Look at Texas, aTm.......hell , look at Jerry Jones and Dallas. Texans have plenty of money, but they think they can run something better than the person they hired to do the job. That is the only shot we have at getting Sark.
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:18 pm to Lucado
It's Lanning. But glad you took all the time to type this up but really say nothing.
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:19 pm to Warrior Court
I bet Oregon counters with a massive offer
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:20 pm to Lucado
why would Alabama hire a coach who couldn't beat Washington and Penix?
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:22 pm to 1801
You referring to Sark or Lanning?
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:23 pm to Lucado
Kiffin > Lanning
Lanning has been HC for two seasons
Lanning has been HC for two seasons
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:24 pm to Hmbre97
quote:both -
You referring to Sark or Lanning?
Posted on 1/10/24 at 5:24 pm to Comancheria
I don’t often agree with Whorn fans but this is spot on.
Go and set the market. See what happens
Go and set the market. See what happens
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News