Favorite team:USA 
Location:318
Biography:
Interests:LSU football
Occupation:
Number of Posts:13096
Registered on:12/19/2007
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

WTB (2) LSU/Alabama

Posted by bstew3006 on 9/28/26 at 5:45 pm
Looking to purchase 2 tickets to LSU/Alabama

bstew3006@yahoo.com

WTB RV pass for Bama game

Posted by bstew3006 on 9/28/26 at 9:08 am
WTB RV lot 413 / 409

Email: bstew3006@yahoo.com

re: The curse of the #7

Posted by bstew3006 on 9/28/26 at 8:14 am to
quote:

The curse of the #7


There is no Curse

Both players would still be hurt if wearing another number.

I’ve never seen a fanbase hate a “players tradition” as much as LSU.
quote:

Oddsmaker on AFR does not sound happy with Kiffin’s antics


I was able to lock in LSU -1 after everyone freaked out. Thank, Coach!
At this point, “Iran wants to make a deal” needs to be the FREE SPACE on the 2026 bingo card.

Hell, can we get a Kalshi market on which day Trump makes his weekly “Iran wants a deal” announcement?
quote:

Everyone who loves LSU should call Finebaum's show tomorrow.


Umm, Fk no.

Are you too dense to realize his schtick and that’s exactly what he wants and how he made his career?
quote:

am certain I read that the meeting g was called specifically to consider expulsion and that it was the only item on the agenda.


No. The meeting has been on the books for months. The change was the “vote”, and now they aren’t going to vote. Business as usual now.
quote:

they scheduled the meeting to vote LSU out it seems they have already made their decision and have their votes since it appears they won't cancel that meeting I guess they will vote LSU out


The meeting for tomorrow has been scheduled for months. The only change was for the “vote” and tomorrow will just be a discussion. They aren’t voting to remove LSU. Relax
I think this is his last stop

He idolizes Saban

He knows what Saban thinks of this place and Saban regretted his decision to leave. That carries a lot of weight.

He has the contract, resources, NIL, recruiting etc. I could keep going, but you get the picture

quote:

The chances of this getting tossed today are still very low, but they aren’t zero.


It’s 0% and always has been.
quote:

Why are you jacklegs so against allowing this thing to cool down?


Too headstrong? I’d argue LSU understands the art of war pretty well. Sometimes you give up a battle to put yourself in a better position to win the war.

LSU filling the 105-man roster took most of the teeth out of the SEC’s argument. Those disputed players aren’t on the roster. If the SEC now continues pursuing expulsion, bans or punishment against LSU, it has to justify punishing a member school for challenging a rule rather than actually violating one.

And now the players can pursue their own claims. Discovery in those cases could become uncomfortable for the SEC because it could expose how these players were treated, which schools recruited or communicated with them, and whether the SEC applied its position consistently across its membership.

Meanwhile, LSU has a team capable of winning the SEC, making the CFP and competing for a national championship.

THAT is the war. LSU doesn’t need to keep fighting every battle today when the courts may fight this one for them.
quote:

It's not like he's being unreasonable. It's fine if the SEC wants to confirm their ability to govern itself, but it shouldn't be retroactively and at the expense of LSU when others have done the same thing over the last couple years. I think almost everyone here would agree with that.


SEC being reactive and not proactive is why we are here today. Sankey couldn’t define a pro player and didn’t know 5/5 ruling. Before June, any player that left school and pursued an nfl career was never allowed back, but ncaa / sec created this grey area. Since there’s a grey area, they threaten to expel LSU. This isn’t action to correct “loss of institutional control” it’s an action to save face by the sec
quote:

LSU isn't rostering Wright and Harris, so they conceded there. But the SEC is going after LSU for recruiting Wright & Harris because they were pro's. Then added a "Lost institutional Control" against LSU because of what Lane said at half-time. So they go after LSU for things detrimental to the SEC and want to now see if they have authority to expel.


First, the players will now sue SEC / Sankey over this. By doing so, they will pull back the curtain on other schools that recruited these players. Those other presidents don’t want that.

Lanes words at half time is a nothing burger.

Filling the 105 man roster took the teeth out of the suit. Continuing to pursue punishment will backfire on SEC and presidents that would vote to expel and expose their actions on the players.

At the end of the day, LSU did not break any rules. Players sued the ncaa and won eligibility. The SEC blocked those players, LSU did not roster these players as SEC wanted. LSU left the door open to roster based on future rulings which is their right and to keep from future lawsuits. SEC threatened expulsion based of possible actions on court rulings. Now find themselves in another lawsuit.

But let’s be honest here, SEC being reactive and not proactive is why we are here today. Sankey couldn’t define a pro player and didn’t know 5/5 ruling. Before June, any player that left school and pursued an nfl career was never allowed back, but ncaa / sec created this grey area. Since there’s a grey area, they threaten to expel LSU. This isn’t action to correct “loss of institutional control” it’s an action to save face by the sec.
quote:

Odds that Lane is suspended or we get put on probation?


0%

Closing the 105 man roster removed the teeth of their Suit. Also, the penalties the SEC laid out weeks ago are tied to LSU rostering the players.
quote:

Attorney for players once bound for LSU plans legal action against SEC, Greg Sankey


SEC schools that recruited these players after the 5/5 ruling is about to be blasted

re: I hate that LSU backed down.

Posted by bstew3006 on 9/9/26 at 6:02 am to
quote:

hate that LSU backed down.


quote:

We should have kept the roster spots empty.


It’s ok to lose a battle to win the war.

LSU is loaded, the Team is Focused, Motivated and Pissed Off.



quote:

SEC looking for "contrition" out of LSU before Thursday's vote


What did they do wrong?

SC / Texas / Missouri - all rostered “pros”.
He keeps repeating this and forgetting 3 other sec schools rostering “pros”.

He then hammered LSU AD / Pres for not speaking publically to end this. Yet, those 3 have not spoken publically.
First, you’re forgetting Missouri, Texas and South Carolina that actually rostered players.

Second, that would then open up other teams that recruited players, which Harris mentioned and would testify too.
quote:

want us to fight. I do not want our school to rollover in any way.


I have no issue moving away from putting these guys on the roster. Make a formal statement. But in no way should LSU pay a fine or be suspended.

I keep reading 15 schools would vote to kick LSU out. Just a reminder, Texas / Missouri / South Carolina all rostered players, LSU did not.