Started By
Message

re: Mizzou Has Been Referred to as a Sleeping Giant in Football

Posted on 8/9/13 at 4:51 pm to
Posted by Tennessee Jed
Mr. SEC Rant
Member since Nov 2009
17909 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 4:51 pm to
giants are not real
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 4:57 pm to
Wmr,


Your posts never get old. I love it! It's uniquely you.
Posted by mograyback
Member since Jul 2011
7102 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

giants are not real


Oh really?

Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23179 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

Not one team in the country could have sustained that amount of injuries and came close to reaching their potential, not one. That is the truth.



I think Osborne meant that there was no reason Missouri couldn't be just as good, or better, than Nebraska - we just haven't had the coach or administrative support to get there. In football, that is - in most other sports, we're better.
Posted by TideJoe
Member since Sep 2012
939 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 5:10 pm to
When the fans and alumni start caring about the program and dumping serious money in it...... that's when Mizzou might become relevant on a consistent basis.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 5:20 pm to
It's happening...we just need a coach to hold up his end of the bargain.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54742 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

When the fans and alumni start caring about the program and dumping serious money in it...... that's when Mizzou might become relevant on a consistent basis.


Pretty much, as for now they are just resting.

Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21123 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 5:46 pm to
Mizzou is the Rip Van Winkle of the SEC.
Posted by DawgHolliday
the 'cloven-land', ga
Member since Sep 2012
4987 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 5:56 pm to
completely off topic but, by your location of The Shadow of the Valley of Death...do you mean Wisconsin Dells, Door County or Oshkosh B'Gosh?

I KEED, I KEED. I lived in 'Scansin a few years ago and was lucky enough to catch a couple of games at Camp Randall. Great college atmosphere. Fifth Quarter is really a cool thing, especially after a win.


Back on topic...I just don't know what its going to take for Mizzou to wake from this slumber but, according to most people posting about them, they have enough meth there to keep damn near any sized creature awake for a 96 hour day...
Posted by Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
Member since Dec 2011
4184 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 6:07 pm to
For sake of context here, what do the non-Mizzou posters here make of Mizzou's 12-2 season in 2007, when it finished ranked #4 in the nation and one half of football away from the national title game? Was the program slumbering then? Was it relevant?

It is a program still only a few years removed from a 10-3 season in 2010. Last year was its first losing season in like 8 years, a streak A&M cannot say it matched in that time.

Why is mizzous entire program status and history here seemingly founded only on one injury riddled first sec season in which it was still only a play or two away from a bowl game? Our program is not the greatest by any means but nor is it the flaming pile of pig shite some of the hyperbole here suggests.
This post was edited on 8/9/13 at 6:09 pm
Posted by mograyback
Member since Jul 2011
7102 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 6:13 pm to
quote:


Why is mizzous entire program status and history here seemingly founded only on one injury riddled first sec season in which it was still only a play or two away from a bowl game? Our program is not the greatest by any means but nor is it the flaming pile of pig shite some of the hyperbole here suggests.



It's how society treats almost anything. We're a sound byte, tweet, status update, bottom line ticker culture with a very very selective long term memory.
Posted by Beer Bryant
In a Hidden Bunker
Member since Jan 2012
8792 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 6:16 pm to
They're my surprise pick of the SEC this year. With the Bowl, I can see them winning 10 games, if they stay healthy this year.
Posted by DawgHolliday
the 'cloven-land', ga
Member since Sep 2012
4987 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 6:18 pm to
Mizzou falls into the category of USCe IMO. Not a consistent history of winning until recent years. A few good years sprinkled here and there over the first 100 years and then somewhat consistent success over the past 10. Being light on tradition is huge in the SEC. You don't have enough past success to point at to be taken as seriously as you want to be in the here and now.

USCe has won 3 in a row against us, and have started to earn respect around the SEC since Spurrier arrived but, they have been here 20+ years.

Mizzou hasn't beaten anyone yet (at least not IN the SEC) so, no respect across the conference.

Bottom line is, you aren't as shitty as we all say you are and you most definitely aren't yet as good as your fan base wants to believe you are.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 6:22 pm to
I am not sure there is a giant to awaken. Not really researching it yet, but I dont know where you plan on getting the talent. I am thinking you get a few four star recruits in state every year. You may get some two and three star recruits out of texas. Then you round out with one and two star in state. I dont really see you guys recruiting on a national level in order to compete with the big guys.
Posted by LSU4BT
Member since Jul 2013
173 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 6:23 pm to
They used to have a giant "M" on their helmet for some reason
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 6:26 pm to
Mizzou will win the SEC the year after Arkansas. So never.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54742 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

For sake of context here, what do the non-Mizzou posters here make of Mizzou's 12-2 season in 2007, when it finished ranked #4 in the nation and one half of football away from the national title game? Was the program slumbering then? Was it relevant?


Past

quote:

SEC


Present

quote:

????


Future



Cocks have shown the roadmap of slow and steady to the top so they are the poster child on how to rise up in the SEC. The future begins and ends with what Mizzou does more than anything else. It may be Pinkel winds up as a HoF SEC coach or it may mean Tiger admins will have to pony up for one like the Cocks dis with Holtz and Spurrier. I can not see the Tigers being Alabama like in the lifetime of the current posters on this board but I do believe they can have a future success.
Posted by Domination
Member since Mar 2009
1260 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

For sake of context here, what do the non-Mizzou posters here make of Mizzou's 12-2 season in 2007, when it finished ranked #4 in the nation and one half of football away from the national title game? Was the program slumbering then? Was it relevant?


The sun shines on every dogs arse eventually? Really, you need several consecutive (5 or more)years of at least top 10 (if not top 5) finishes to be any sort of a "giant," sleeping or otherwise. Mizzou is nowhere near that. I don't think that Boise State is considered one of the giants of CFB, and they have done waaaaay more than Mizzou.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
28633 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 6:40 pm to
I don't know enough about Mizzou football. That ain't a good start!

*edit*

But I promise I'm not hatin... I have nothing against Mizzou at all. Hope for the best since y'all are in the SEC now. :)
This post was edited on 8/9/13 at 6:42 pm
Posted by SeaCay
Odessa, FL
Member since Mar 2012
1727 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 6:47 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter