1
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/30/26 at 5:41 pm to wadewilson
quote:
He already had 5 years. This is his 6th.
That's not the point.
Point is that his disputed seasons are all before 5 For 5 passed.
Obviously NCAA had no luck applying 5 For 5 to the past as evidenced by the 100s of other players ineligible under 5 For 5 but thst have been granted exceptions for this season.
Who knows if they'll have success fighting 5 For 5 exceptions in the future but 5 For 5 is still a completely different thing than American pro contracts which have always been against rules regardless of 5 for 5.
I feel like everyone knows this though.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 5:51 pm to Knight of Old
quote:
So you trust sports journalism from leftist rags?
Got it…
I know I am the OP and I have gotten quite a few replies as if I am the author of the article or I believe it...
I merely brought the article and content over here. I did not confirm nor deny any belief or non belief of the validity of the article. It seems like an Inflammatory hit piece honestly.
I just wanted to bring in the clicks for Chicken. I haven't paid him rent in a while.
This post was edited on 10/30/26 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 10/30/26 at 6:38 pm to King
quote:
Much like the original missed move of forbidding the rostering of professional players, Rousse could’ve stopped Kiffin intentionally embarrassing the league before it happened.
Bwahahahahaha
How exactly did LSU embarrass the league? Who did we roster?
It’s the league that embarrassed themselves. Arguing the extremely blurred line of professionalism and the cluster frick created by the arbitrary 5 for 5 exclusion of the 2022 players. The SEC looks petty.
Plus the SEC embarrassed itself by threatening to expel one of its premier brands. Seven national titles across 4 sports in the past 25 years
Frankly I no longer give a shite if we are a part of the SEC.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 6:41 pm to King
Thank you for spreading messaging that makes all of us dumber. Great contribution.
This post was edited on 10/30/26 at 6:41 pm
Posted on 10/30/26 at 6:41 pm to King
What are you talking about? LSU will never bow down to the SEC. .
Posted on 10/30/26 at 6:43 pm to JohnnyU
The SEC didn’t even vote for the rule for them to enforce until after the players committed or showed interest in LSU.
This shite is so stupid.
I guess we are now at the stage where people support the idea of punishing someone for something they could possibly do even if they don’t do it.
Minority Report is a great movie
This shite is so stupid.
I guess we are now at the stage where people support the idea of punishing someone for something they could possibly do even if they don’t do it.
Minority Report is a great movie
Posted on 10/30/26 at 6:56 pm to King
This is the most retarded click-bait article I've ever read.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 6:59 pm to JohnnyU
quote:
How exactly did LSU embarrass the league?
Well Sankey was forced to testify and expose the world to how fricking stupid he is. It wasn’t LSUs lawsuit but the proximity is making us the target for his incompetence and the autistic rage that comes after a public embarrassment.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 7:13 pm to Veritas
quote:
I guess we are now at the stage where people support the idea of punishing someone for something they could possibly do even if they don’t do it.
I've never heard anyone advocate for punishing someone for possible intent until the Rantards found this case.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 7:17 pm to cajunbama
quote:
cajunbama
I just wrote an opinion piece for USA today that says gumps are transitioning from insest to polyamorous predominately gay relationships.
USA Today loved it. Must be true.
This post was edited on 10/30/26 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 10/30/26 at 7:21 pm to King
If you hate LSU so much then why do you spend a lot of time on an LSU site. frick off
Posted on 10/30/26 at 8:05 pm to King
Posted on 10/30/26 at 8:06 pm to King
I’m still trying to figure out what rules LSU broke.
Please list them. I can’t find any.
Please list them. I can’t find any.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 8:08 pm to King
Drivel
Posted on 10/30/26 at 8:11 pm to King
It's so funny how deep we are in high fans head
Posted on 10/30/26 at 8:33 pm to Jest a game
Post elections when congress meets up again Sankey is getting an invite to capital hill to testify to Congress about why conferences should keep the anti trust exemption.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 10:59 pm to PGJ
quote:
Crimes have not been committed.
Nah… unless the SEC gets an outright win in federal court, antitrust & criminal contempt at a minimum.
But hey, you’re free to dickride Matt Hayes reporting from (checks notes) Jacksonville Mississippi
Posted on 10/30/26 at 11:18 pm to LSUGraduate2002
quote:
Post elections when congress meets up again Sankey is getting an invite to capital hill to testify to Congress about why conferences should keep the anti trust exemption.
College football is fricked if they let that retard testify about anything again.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 11:39 pm to Coldcushcush
quote:
if Sankey was worth a shite (he isn't) he would have the SEC actually pass a rule that negated court orders.
I don’t think the SEC was specifically named in TRO until after they passed the rule. The rule led to amended filings and then the injunction ruling.
The original federal court ruling that was applied nationally but ended up being stayed on appeal specifically included that the NCAA rules on professionals still had to be followed. The SEC only needed to act when the local yokels started up.
Page 13 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News