Started By
Message
Kansas and Missouri are the next rational Big10 additions
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:12 am
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:12 am
Leaves a spot open for the SEC
Is it Clemson or UNC?
Is it Clemson or UNC?
16
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:13 am to Poichess
You won’t get UNC without Duke. Same for UVA and Va. Tech
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:14 am to Poichess
NC State would be a decent fit
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:17 am to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
You won’t get UNC without Duke. Same for UVA and Va. Tech
Why not take all 4. Duke & UVA might not be football powers but they would help potentially bring in someone like ND or Stanford or someone who’s a little more into academics.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:23 am to Poichess
Missouri tried to get into the Big 10 when Nebraska joined. The Big 10 left them at the altar. I highly doubt that Mizzou is going to risk their lucrative spot in the SEC for a potential bid to the Big 10.
This post was edited on 7/1/22 at 9:25 am
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:28 am to Poichess
Im still in shock about all these "who does the SEC drop" threads. All this really means is the SEC may end up adding a few more.
This post was edited on 7/1/22 at 10:06 am
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:28 am to Poichess
Big 24
Notre Dame
Indiana
Purdue
Ohio St
Michigan
Michigan St
Illinois
Northwestern
Wisconsin
Minnesota
Iowa
Iowa St
Nebraska
Mizzou
Kansas
Colorado
Penn St
West Virginia
Maryland
Boston College
USC
UCLA
Oregon
Stanford
SEC
Texas
Texas A&M
Oklahoma
Arkansas
LSU
Ole Miss
Miss St
Alabama
Auburn
Tennessee
Kentucky
Louisville
Georgia
Georgia Tech
Florida
Florida St
South Carolina
Clemson
Duke
North Carolina
NC St
Virginia
Virginia Tech
Miami
Notre Dame
Indiana
Purdue
Ohio St
Michigan
Michigan St
Illinois
Northwestern
Wisconsin
Minnesota
Iowa
Iowa St
Nebraska
Mizzou
Kansas
Colorado
Penn St
West Virginia
Maryland
Boston College
USC
UCLA
Oregon
Stanford
SEC
Texas
Texas A&M
Oklahoma
Arkansas
LSU
Ole Miss
Miss St
Alabama
Auburn
Tennessee
Kentucky
Louisville
Georgia
Georgia Tech
Florida
Florida St
South Carolina
Clemson
Duke
North Carolina
NC St
Virginia
Virginia Tech
Miami
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:40 am to Poichess
quote:
Kansas and Missouri are the next rational Big10 additions
If the B1G wanted Kansas, they could've invited them at any point since about 2011. Missouri is also very much not a priority for the B1G. If they do expand further, they will pick the best bits from the PAC and try to finally land ND. Why would they take Mizzou and Kansas if Oregon and ND are potentially on the table?
Sorry SEC, y'all are stuck with our underachieving program. And Kansas better be hoping for a seat at whichever of the PAC, Big 12, or ACC survives this mess.
This post was edited on 7/1/22 at 9:41 am
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:43 am to Poichess
Disagree. Oregon and Washington are the next logical choices. They're both stronger overall brands than Kansas and Missouri, they have historical ties playing Big 10 schools, USC/UCLA didn't make their move without thinking that other West Coast school would join for travel purposes, and Oregon and Washington won't be able to stand pat financially.
If the choice is between Clemson and North Carolina, you choose North Carolina every day of the week and twice on Sunday.
If the choice is between Clemson and North Carolina, you choose North Carolina every day of the week and twice on Sunday.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:45 am to waiting4saturday
quote:
Why not take all 4. Duke & UVA might not be football powers but they would help potentially bring in someone like ND or Stanford or someone who’s a little more into academics.
We absolutely would if we thought we had to expand again to keep them from going to the Big 10. Can't just surrender North Carolina and Virginia to the Big 10; too many dollars and eyeballs in those two states.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:48 am to Poichess
Mizzou would never go to the B10 as a package deal to help out kU. They are screwed and will probably end up dropping football or going independent
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:52 am to mouse_cop
quote:
Mizzou would never go to the B10 as a package deal to help out kU. They are screwed and will probably end up dropping football or going independent
Especially on the brink of schedule changes that are going to more tightly integrate Missouri into the fabric of the conference.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:54 am to mouse_cop
More Mizzou speculation. What happened to the AAC?
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:55 am to Poichess
Why would Mizzou voluntarily leave the SEC money?
I would love to see them go to the BIG just to get them out of the SEC, but, again, why would they?
I would love to see them go to the BIG just to get them out of the SEC, but, again, why would they?
Posted on 7/1/22 at 10:15 am to multicampus
It’s quite clear that the only option for Notre Dame is the big ten. I would assume at some point they will join them
Posted on 7/1/22 at 11:09 am to Poichess
No to both
Posted on 7/1/22 at 11:11 am to Poichess
Missouri was rejected by big 10
Posted on 7/1/22 at 11:14 am to Poichess
North Carolina should be the SEC’s next target, if the jump to 20 is inevitable.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 11:22 am to Zgeo
Wrong wallflower they offered a partial membership and Mizzou said no and then NU took it. That's why NU didn't get a full membership from the Big 10 Network for several years.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 11:26 am to MeatPants
quote:You would think so, but the Big 10 has targeted them for decades, probably before they took Penn State in. Yet, the Irish have kept their distance... but not from all conferences, since they're partners with the ACC.
It’s quite clear that the only option for Notre Dame is the big ten. I would assume at some point they will join them
That tells me there's some resistance to the Big 10 in South Bend.
They don't fit the regional SEC makeup, but if we go to a national model, they'd be a big score, and more importantly, a huge dagger to the Big 10 if they joined us. They'd be the SEC team in the heart of Big 10 country, a big respected brand there.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News