Started By
Message
re: Josh Pate believes radical changes are coming to the CFP in 2026
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:44 am to Landmass
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:44 am to Landmass
quote:
16 is too many and 4 is way too few.
16 is fine and a better format. Home playoff games are an amazing experience for the student body, fans, city etc of the host team and a cool road experience for road team. This is what CFB is about. Byes to bowl games where you must have thousands of dollars to attend or be a corporate stooge that is given tickets is bullshite.
I think the current playoff robs the fan's of the best teams and incredible way to finish the season.
This post was edited on 12/11/24 at 7:46 am
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:49 am to jchamil
It’s a bad idea because UT already beat bama and ole miss already beat USC
Or should I say it’s a bad idea with those teams playing
I actually like the idea but got to figure out some way to make regular season still matter
And overall I think playoff is fine with some tweaking
I think strength of schedule has to be weighed out more
Or should I say it’s a bad idea with those teams playing
I actually like the idea but got to figure out some way to make regular season still matter
And overall I think playoff is fine with some tweaking
I think strength of schedule has to be weighed out more
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:53 am to RollTide1987
SEC with "3-4 guaranteed spots" = the excuse to move the format to 16 teams.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:53 am to TygerLyfe
quote:
The fact that conference champions in weak conferences get a auto-bid is absurd and is an affront to selecting the best teams.
I actually like the auto bid (hate me if you will) but it's an accomplishment to win your conference, even if it's weaker. If a team (say Alabama) doesn't like it, then they are free to move to one of the weaker conferences and be guaranteed to make playoffs every year.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:54 am to Hater Bait
quote:
There is no way they can frick up college football worse than they’ve already have
Sankey says, "Hold my beer."
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:59 am to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
How is that a bad idea?
the 3rd and 4th SEC teams would beat most of the field yet have to play extra games to get in just because? screw that.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:03 am to burke985
quote:
I don't think it's ignorant
To have 10-2 SEC squad play a 9-3 and 2 other 9-3 teams play as play in games? But let another 10-2 avoid that?
It’s poorly thought out at best.
If you want a play in game then let the 9-3 teams figure it out.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:05 am to Smokeyone
The playoffs are fine. They have got to fix NIL and the transfer portal.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:15 am to burke985
quote:
I don't think it's ignorant, if your borderline it gives you a shot to get in instead of leaving it up to someone else's opinion.
so different than anything we have ever seen?
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:28 am to lsu777
quote:
It’s a bad idea because UT already beat bama and ole miss already beat USC
Or should I say it’s a bad idea with those teams playing
Wouldn't it be:
#3 UT vs #6 Carolina
#4 Bama vs #5 Ole Miss
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:32 am to burke985
quote:
instead of leaving it up to someone else's opinion.
this has always been the problem
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:44 am to RollTide1987
It doesn't get anymore radical than the targeting rule, NIL and the transfer portal. How many playoff games is a silly argument.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:47 am to RollTide1987
There are 134 FBS division 1 football. Just make a 134 team playoff and everyone is happy
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:49 am to TxTiger758
quote:
it's an accomplishment to win your conference
It's an accomplishment to win the Division II national championship, too, but do any of us for one moment think they could go toe to toe with whoever wins the FBS national championship? I think not.
Not all conferences are equal.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:56 am to RollTide1987
I used to like Josh Pate. It seems like his content is getting worse and worse. It seems like he is just trying to get clicks instead of putting out good content.
Fine baum went the same direction a few years ago
Fine baum went the same direction a few years ago
Posted on 12/11/24 at 9:44 am to RollTide1987
This is a fantastic idea, but it'll never happen. The decision makers don't want teams to control their own destinies, they want to control who gets in and who doesn't for the sake of being "fair". By "fair", I mean to the teams from weak conferences who play no one.
Having a committee is a fricking joke. It's obvious there are methods available that will determine playoff teams without a committee, such as the one presented by Josh Pate.
Having a committee is a fricking joke. It's obvious there are methods available that will determine playoff teams without a committee, such as the one presented by Josh Pate.
This post was edited on 12/11/24 at 9:48 am
Posted on 12/11/24 at 10:23 am to Buster83
quote:
It seems like his content is getting worse and worse.
He isn’t content at all. All you have to do is watch his show and he will tell you that he hates this. However, he sees the writing on the walls and he knows where everything is headed. People tell him what they’re thinking.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 10:28 am to RollTide1987
Personally I think that the playoff should be 8 teams. Twelve teams is too flukey and you start flirting with 9-3 teams getting in, and no 9-3 team should ever be in the playoff.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 10:32 am to RollTide1987
quote:
It's an accomplishment to win the Division II national championship, too, but do any of us for one moment think they could go toe to toe with whoever wins the FBS national championship?
So great point, however the teams that win a p4 conference are much better than a Div II team. That is a far exaggeration to make a claim. Yes I agree some conferences are "tougher" than others. However it still doesn't diminish the fact they won a p4 conference and should get an auto bid. If they didn't you would be complaining about playing the same teams 2 or 3 times a season
Popular
Back to top
