Favorite team:Florida 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:Drafting and Design
Number of Posts:39925
Registered on:3/6/2011
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

The older I get, the more ok I am with this.


i'm curious when Xbox, Sony, and Nintendo are going to make it a requirement to play online.
quote:

So yea anyone upset they have to verify to look at adult content is a fricking creep.


yeah, i can see that point of view and agree to some extent. however, major corporations have been known to have pretty significant data leaks. that can't be glossed over.


eta: a Discord staffer cleared some things up in a Reddit thread. he's the quote:

https://www.reddit.com/r/discordapp/comments/1r05vkj/discord_will_require_a_face_scan_or_id_for_full/


quote:

Tl;dr: The vast majority of adults will never have to interact with our age assurance systems and their experience won't change, because we know Discord and how people use it, so we're designing to respect privacy and deliver a safer experience while minimizing friction for adults.

Hey folks –

I’ve been on Discord since very early 2016 and actually joined the company in 2017. Safety is one of my areas, so today’s announcement on our blog is something I’ve been pretty involved with. I’ve always cared about Discord's approach to privacy (E2EE for A/V was another of my projects here), so I figured I’d add some more context to today's news.

I can say confidently that the vast majority of people will never see age verification. I say this because we launched age assurance in the UK and Australia in 2025, and we have some pretty good data on this now. The idea here is that we can pre-identify most adults based on what we already know (not including your messages!), and that looks to get us pretty far here. No face scans, no IDs, for the vast majority of adults.

And if you are one of the smaller subset of folks that we can't definitively pre-identify, then still, you only have to do it if you're accessing age-restricted servers or channels, or changing certain settings. That's really not most users. (Altho... might be more Redditors, tbh.)

Last, I know that there is concern about privacy and data leaks. That's a real concern. The selfie system is built purely client-side, it never leaves your device, and we did that intentionally. That'll work for a bunch of users who aren't pre-identified as adults. But if you do end up in the ID bucket, then yeah, you're right that has some risk. We're doing what we can to minimize this by working with our range of partners (who are different partners than the data leak you read about), and if it's any help, we learned a lot internally from the last issue. But I get if that doesn't necessarily inspire more confidence.

Anyway, we’ll be sharing more next month as we get closer to the global roll out about the system, including the technology behind it in March. I honestly wouldn't be happy if we didn't build something good and I am excited about what we’re launching, but please let us know what you think when we share more details.

And I really appreciate everybody's feedback here today. We’re definitely reading it!

re: Alabama State Parks

Posted by finchmeister08 on 2/9/26 at 5:58 pm to
Lake Point in Eufaula can be pretty nice. You also have the Barbour County Management Area nearby as well.
Nah, I meant simple party voice chat. It was convenient for that.
https://www.theverge.com/tech/875309/discord-age-verification-global-roll-out


quote:

Discord announced on Monday that it’s rolling out age verification on its platform globally starting next month, when it will automatically set all users’ accounts to a “teen-appropriate” experience unless they demonstrate that they’re adults.
I don't usually recommend Armed Scholar videos just due to his "bait-n-switch" video titles, but this one is pretty spot on with the video topic.


Basically, this bill would ban direct to consumer ammunition. You would be required to go to your local dealer to verify you're legal to own it. You can also be flagged for buying in bulk. Bulk is defined as 1,000 or more rounds in less than 5 days.

re: RMR Red Dot?

Posted by finchmeister08 on 2/8/26 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

I know for a Glock 43x, you have to have an adapter plate.


My 43x has a direct mounted Vortex Defender Micro. No plate needed.

Both are made for Shield RMS/RMSc footprints.

re: RMR Red Dot?

Posted by finchmeister08 on 2/8/26 at 7:45 pm to
Most optic cut slides for handguns vary from gun to gun.

Some are cut large to fit a wide range of different footprints.

Glock MOS is one. You pretty much need an adapter plate suited to the red dot you plan to mount.


RMR is a footprint style that Trijicon came up with. It’s probably the most popular.


Trijicon and Holosun both use these footprints.


Sig, Vortex, and Leupold use Delta Point Pro footprints.


When the instructor mentioned “RMR”, he was probably generalizing red dots and wasn’t speaking specifically to Trijicon.
The one where the Titans were a yard short from winning:


They’re legit. They even have a pretty cool YouTube channel.
Just wait until yall find out that the current DOJ thinks they can still enforce the pistol brace rule… if they wanted to.
"During the final stage of U.S. Army Ranger selection, an elite team’s training exercise turns into a fight for survival against an unimaginable threat. Watch Alan Ritchson in War Machine on March 6th."


1) GTA: Vice City
2) Everyone else