Favorite team:Alabama 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:10805
Registered on:11/30/2023
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
ok I take back the jab for the Eurotrip reference
quote:

LSU fans’ identity is tied to baseball


Its the only sport that the rest of the SEC doesnt regularly embarrass them in. Its quite literally all they have
You cant get anymore hypocritical than playing a former pro player on your team...and complaining about another player having a former pro player on their team
quote:

Who controls the media and money?


Youre asking too many questions
quote:

My kids when they were toddlers didn't whine like bitch-arse populists.


Hopefully they wont support generational theft like their welfare queen father
quote:


And yet, the median household income went up from $55,000 in 1960 to $80,000 today (in inflation adjusted dollars),


We artificially keep inflation down...with cheap foreign labor, cheap imports from China, and subsidies.

Why did median household income stop tracking with the money supply before like it did before 1990?

A better question is how is it even possible for that multiplier to change so much? I gave my theory, you are free to give another one
quote:

quote:You couldnt even understand the simple metric I used. You are a simpleton I understood it and proposed one equally valid.



Well you are a marxist, so lying is basically your forte
quote:

quote:
I just dont see any path where this can be rectified through voting.

I don’t either, because a lot of my natural allies believe the economic illiteracy in the OP.


You couldnt even understand the simple metric I used. You are a simpleton
quote:

quote:
Calculate the rise in median family income relative to the rise in money supply from earliest measured date to 1990. Then apply that same multiplier to the total rise in money supply from 1990 to today and give me what the median household income would be

What? The median household income is not supposed to be proportionate to the money supply. You should ask Grok to tell you what it would be had it grown at the rate of your rose bush.


The first obvious question is "why not"

But I didnt ask Grok to calculate it based of money supply. I asked it to determine how much median household income grew relative to money supply from 1957(earliest record of M2) to 1990...then apply that multiplier to the change in M2(money supply) from 1990 to current day
quote:

If she complains for enough years, she might become as ugly as her momma


Who is her momma?
quote:

quote:When you can collect welfare and many other social programs and still live pretty comfortably shite happens. When you're poor and refuse to work you can commit theft. But there is a risk of getting caught. Our system allows you to vote for politicians who will commit the theft for you.


Its almost like there is a pact between the uber wealthy and powerful and the people at the bottom who are fine with a small bit of the bounty as long as it requires no effort. Its the people in the middle who actually make the wheels turn that have no power
quote:

If spending and the size of gov’t are you top issues (they are mine), there’s no way to justify voting for either Rs or Ds. They are both bent on spending us into oblivion.


Aint gonna lie, I just dont see any path where this can be rectified through voting. The people who are most wealthy and powerful will never give up this power willingly. It will require divine intervention.
quote:

This a ludricus association.


Ludicrous* and no it isnt
quote:

I think there needs to be a distinction. The “uber” wealthy can be divided into categories:


Id agree. There are certainly producers, and though they may have benefitted from the circumstances(Elon Musk being great example), they are still a net positive producer.
quote:

quote:
The reason that wages and inflation hasnt tracked with increase in money supply...is that the money is being skimmed off the top, aka STOLEN. The already wealthy...became uber wealthy


100% accurate. This is a slow frog boil situation to me.

Normal, taxpaying citizens are subsidizing the fronts and theft set up by the elite. As we get squeezed out, more and more people depend on the govt; however, that money supply will run out at some point.


One problem is that when it all collapses(and it will), even if money value deteriorates, the wealthy will still hold the deeds to everything. Without violence it seems that this wont be rectified.

As Americans we had it beaten into our heads that the wealthy are to be admired, that they got there through hard work and that is where we want to be. The idea of confiscating wealth(even if acquired by theft) will be a hard pill to swallow for heritage, white Americans


Artificially created money has completely changed the dynamic of our economy. Instead of producing things, the main driver of effort related to gaining wealth shifted to siphoning off as much printed money as possible. How did men like Epstein get so incredibly wealthy while not producing anything tangible? Why do politicians become wealthy during their time as "public servants"? How are companies emboldened to burn money on social messaging rather than actual advertisement that will drive product sales? How is it that supposedly money starved States and local governments have fraud in the billions?

When you are confined to a real economy where money supply is stable, you must act in a real way. There is no margin for foolishness, there is no margin for widespread fraud, not every Tom, Dick and Harry on the east coast can go from marginally wealthy to uber wealthy. Why has EVERYTHING become political....because everyone with sense knows that its impossible to outproduce the money printer. Its a much better strategy to buy access to the pile of new money than to engage in real economic activity.

The fact that inflation is so low...is a bad thing. I asked Grok the following question:

quote:

Calculate the rise in median family income relative to the rise in money supply from earliest measured date to 1990. Then apply that same multiplier to the total rise in money supply from 1990 to today and give me what the median household income would be


The answer(what median household income SHOULD be): $231,641
ACTUAL median household income in 2026: $83,730

The reason that wages and inflation hasnt tracked with increase in money supply...is that the money is being skimmed off the top, aka STOLEN. The already wealthy...became uber wealthy

This has turned our country into an oligarchy, where the wealthy have amassed so much wealth that they can literally burn it through social messaging with CULTURAL ROT...to convince us plebs to keep feeding the machine. This is why we are exposed to political slop 24/7.

The ironic thing is that even with all this money, it became HARDER for the average joe to get ahead. While the wealthy have stolen and hoard trillions, that average joe cant even get a $20k loan to start a business, unless he has a mountain of capital already.

Only God can save this land and people. The country as we knew it died a long time ago. We now are the United Oligarchy of Wealthy while us plebs get our bread and circuses to entertain us

quote:

It becomes more clear to me every day that someone has Trump by the balls.


Yes. I just dont think Trump is the type of man that goes for children...but something has him scared
quote:


Why aren’t people in handcuffs?


Because when Bondi was asked this question, she had a panic attack and started talking about the damn stock market. Clearly these people are terrified of whomever is truly running things.