Started By
Message

re: Is LSU a blue blood? Is Georgia?

Posted on 10/21/20 at 11:33 am to
Posted by TideFaninFl
On the space coast
Member since Oct 2017
6647 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Or years they didn’t play in one, like 1942...


There are very few teams before 1975 that have won multiple NC and had all their NC winning teams play in bowl games, even fewer that won NC before WWII




ETA- But guess who meets that standard?

This post was edited on 10/21/20 at 11:43 am
Posted by XWing atAliciousness
Member since Jan 2018
8623 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 11:34 am to
Depends how you define it. You could narrow it down to 4-5 schools, or consider it to be 13-15 schools.

The only ones that are bonafide, no question football blue bloods in my opinion are:

Ohio State
Alabama
Oklahoma
Notre Dame

I would say that Texas, USC, Michigan and Nebraska probably are, but they've obviously slipping away into obscurity due to the past ~10 years. Nebraska the last 20 years.

Beyond that: LSU, Clemson, Georgia, Penn State, Tennessee and maybe Auburn should all for sure be considered
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65139 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 11:35 am to
quote:

This is the dumbest thing you can say on the internet.

"oo i dont have a comeback so Ill just attack the person for not using a comma!"


You literally did the same thing, dude, except you dismissed my opinion entirely without making fun of my (impeccable) grammar. What other argument do you want me to make after you pretty much say, "Yeah...it doesn't matter what you think"?

You've shut down all discussion at that point.
Posted by bstew3006
318
Member since Dec 2007
12578 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 11:37 am to
quote:

These are the results averaging ranks of all time wins, weeks in AP poll, weeks at #1, bowl game appearances, and all time win %:


You have to add National Championshipsto this
Posted by Chad4Bama
Member since Sep 2020
5696 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Most people will say that there are only eight:
USC, Alabama, Texas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Michigan, Notre Dame and Ohio State


This.

Although Texas is iffy to me. Nebraska is doing everything they can to give up their blue blood membership lol.
Posted by Tidemeister
Member since May 2016
1234 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 11:41 am to
Blue bloods are really the traditional teams who have won big over many decades, starting back in the 1920's and 30's. You can talk about teams who have won big relatively recently, i.e. Clemson, LSU, others, but they are not true blue bloods. Florida State would not even be a real blue blood had they continued winning after Bowden, because of their late start in the 70's/80's. Nebraska and Penn State a close call. The REAL blue bloods below:

Alabama
Oklahoma
Sou. Cal
Notre Dame
Ohio State
Michigan
Texas
This post was edited on 10/21/20 at 11:43 am
Posted by Mithridates6
Member since Oct 2019
8220 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 11:42 am to
Texas has been really inconsistent since Darrell K Royal and that 2004-09 stretch was more the exception than the norm
Posted by Tidemeister
Member since May 2016
1234 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Nebraska is doing everything they can to give up their blue blood membership lol.


Agree, they have really fallen hard from the elite, amazing. They have arguably the most loyal fans anywhere; I know for many years that had the most consecutive hard sell outs at home, and had a huge following at away games at long distances.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65139 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 11:46 am to
quote:

that 2004-09 stretch was more the exception than the norm


Despite being absolutely piss poor for the last 10 years, Texas is still #4 all-time in wins and #7 all-time in win percentage.
Posted by Mithridates6
Member since Oct 2019
8220 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 11:51 am to
They were mostly bad from 1984-1994 too. It's not as easy a job as people think. But overall they're still a blue-blood I'd agree
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49313 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Both UGA and LSU are bluebloods

Nah
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58919 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 11:54 am to


Don't misunderstand me.....LSU is much closer right now than we are.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58919 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Princeton has 26 national titles. Are they a blueblood? Yale has 18. Are they?




quote:

Neither of them are even in the FBS. So no.

Not making a case for them by any means...but at the time they won those they WERE the FBS for all practical purposes. They were the SEC of their time.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58919 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Back when? The vast majority of their national championships were awarded, retroactively, after they left major college football.


So? They were the big players back then. They won more games than anybody else.

We agree on them not counting but we use different reasoning. They don't count because very few teams played back then. Maybe 10-20 teams in the country?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65139 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

So? They were the big players back then. They won more games than anybody else.


That's great. They haven't done anything in almost 90 years. If we're debating Nebraska's blue blood status after 19 years of being down, Princeton and Yale are definitely out of the conversation.
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35574 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Texas has been really inconsistent since Darrell K Royal and that 2004-09 stretch was more the exception than the norm


Texas has lost 3 or more games 30 of the last 40 years with many seasons mixed in with outright losing records. Other than 2001-2009 they've been an average program for a long time.

This post was edited on 10/21/20 at 12:34 pm
Posted by WildcatMike
Lexington, KY
Member since Dec 2005
41571 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Which makes the comparison inaccurate


Don’t get pissy...it is a good comparison.
Posted by ManBearSharkReb
Member since Dec 2018
3763 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:37 pm to
Ole Miss has more SEC West co-championships than Georgia.

Checkmate
Posted by patawan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2019
150 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:46 pm to
Nobody's opinions matter when you use metrics to gauge things instead of "feelings".

Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84879 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:48 pm to
These things always just depend on where you want to draw the line on what a blue blood is or isn't.

People forget/discount it but LSU had plenty of success before 2000 and are a top 10ish all time program.

People who like LSU say that's blue blood, people who don't say it isn't.
This post was edited on 10/21/20 at 12:49 pm
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter