Started By
Message
re: I’m ignoring this…
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:16 am to Gifman
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:16 am to Gifman
quote:
If ole miss lets Lane coach in the playoff they would’ve won.
Because Lane won so many big games huh? Lane lost to UGA. Pete beat UGA. Lane losses that game by not kicking the FGs early and getting into to big of a hole before halftime.
1
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:17 am to Gifman
quote:
If ole miss lets Lane coach in the playoff they would’ve won. Imagine being so salty that you ruin your chance at a natty.
Lane's known for phoning it in when he's got a new job lined up.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:36 am to GatorOnAnIsland
he B1G insisted the SEC was not all that good when we won 7 in a row. Wake me up when the B1G wins 7 in a row, and i will be impressed. Buncha amateurs.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:24 am to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
Because Lane won so many big games huh? Lane lost to UGA. Pete beat UGA.
I think Lane beat UGa in 2024 and it was Pete's defense that gave up all those 43 points put up on you. Oh yeah, Pete won a neutral field while y'all lost on the road in a hostile environment under Lane.
Make no mistake, that was Lane's team and the offense was lead by Lane's LSU staff.
Pete "Booger" Golding will be the next Gene Chizik or Larry Coker. They were men who had initial success with a program someone else built and then were canned after wrecking the program.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 11:06 am to GatorOnAnIsland
I only like SEC ball. I do not care what others are doing.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 11:19 am to Gifman
He would have lost to Georgia playing too aggressive
Posted on 3/31/26 at 1:23 pm to JohnnyU
Lane didn’t build shite, he is good at knowing who to pay though. He has never won anything of substance and won’t, because he’s a shite coach
Posted on 3/31/26 at 2:07 pm to lefty08
quote:
He has never won anything of substance and won’t, because he’s a shite coach
C'mon man....don't sugar-coat it. Tell us how you really feel about Lane.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 2:19 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
I don’t have the want or need to ignore it. Doesn’t really matter, imo.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 2:40 pm to Gifman
I'm not sure they win it all, but it would've definitely helped their chances.
And further it shows how juvenile they are in Oxford.
And further it shows how juvenile they are in Oxford.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 3:52 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
You made a thread about it so I do not think you are ignoring it lol
Posted on 3/31/26 at 4:02 pm to Gatorbait2008
That’s really smart coming from a ARK fan whose team hasn’t done anything in FB since Houston Nutt and he didn’t do much.Yall just hired a high school coach and you’re criticizing LSU,what a pussy?
Posted on 3/31/26 at 4:23 pm to RGT
Lane isn't a good coach. He is however the best that was available this past year. For whatever that is worth
Posted on 4/1/26 at 7:36 am to RGT
quote:
LSU,what a pussy
Oh, I agree. Good point !
Posted on 4/1/26 at 8:21 am to greygoose
quote:
He obviously preffered the smell of corndog
Who doesn't?? Have you never smelled a corndog? They smell fricking delicious.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 9:55 am to GatorOnAnIsland
Indiana didn't bother me, that was a fun story.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 2:28 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
Well, if the CFP committee didn’t purposely put SEC vs SEC in the first round of games, we might have a fair comparison. They do what they can to prop up the big 10.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 4:24 pm to Dawgs2122
quote:if you’re not cheating you’re not trying.
And Michigan?
At the end of the day they were elite in the trenches. Sure stealing signs might’ve given them an extra edge but they were physical and dominant enough to win on talent and experience alone.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 4:25 pm to theCAW
Maybe. We'll never really know though, will we.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News