Started By
Message

re: If Johnny Manziel doesn't win another Heisman, is it out of spite?

Posted on 9/30/13 at 12:12 am to
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
21206 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 12:12 am to
I came here to talk about how the media won't let Johnny repeat as Heisman but now this it's a recruiting thread. I too late.
Posted by WreckingCrue
Member since Aug 2013
765 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 12:16 am to
Manziels stats are so far ahead of everyone's stats ever they wont even tell you. For the love of god he sat out half of a game, then sat out the back half of a game. Dropped the most ever against the tide in its history.

anyone that doesn't understand that Sumlin can destroy the SEC recorded and is choosing not to is an idiot. Johnny can literally run the stats to he likeling. The word last year from this board was the SEC had the film now and he would be stopped. The truth is he can have his way with all of the SEC. He may not win, but if anyone gave him 3 D players they would wreck everyone.

Bottom line - this is the best QB to ever come along - ever. and everyone is having a hard time with that.

Sumlin could run his stats up so much farther thn anything the sec has eber seen but he is choosing not to. Give him some class. Bama knows this.

He let Ark off the hook for about 21 4th.

He is the best player. By a million miles.
Posted by HumpIt
Nederland, TX
Member since Sep 2013
6 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 2:27 am to
quote:

You really should try looking around at the rest of CFB in this regard. WAYYY more flops from the HS ranks top ranked or not at QB than successes....you're showing deep ignorance if you think it's a sure thing with Kyle Allen.


I said not concerned... Nothing about Kyle Allen being a "sure thing". So what should we do, go after a lower prospect and hope he's undervalued? You, sir, are the one showing ignorance.
Posted by PepaSpray
Adamantium Membership
Member since Aug 2012
11080 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 2:41 am to
quote:

If you just go on pure stats Mariota is doing better.
High stats against no name opponents do not count when ya can't get the dubya...

Right LSU?
Posted by WreckingCrue
Member since Aug 2013
765 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 2:46 am to
You go on pure stats when one guy sets the all time record vs. the Univerity of Alabama on O. 98 yds. rushing, 465 passing 5 tds .

That's the same as Nevada vs long beach st.

You are a Dumb frick.
Posted by PepaSpray
Adamantium Membership
Member since Aug 2012
11080 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 2:48 am to
Was mocking Oregon you semen swilling no name limey douchenheimer.

Damn, you're illiterate and retarded.
Posted by WonderWartHawg
Member since Dec 2010
10408 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 6:49 am to
Depends on how many more aTm loses.
Part of the equation the last several years has been the won-loss record of the team, it seems.
Lose a couple more games, forget it.
Posted by BearBait09
Texas
Member since Aug 2013
2307 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:14 am to
Griffin had 3 loss and Manziel 2 last year, so its really not necessarily a best man best team award,

if you look at the past 3 years, Newton, Griffin, JFF, the common link is all three players were on teams that massively passed their expectations.

A&M will need to beat LSU and everyone else they have left in order to meet or exceed expectations. In all likelihood that would send A&M to at large BCS game instead of cotton bowl, and I don't believe the voters will hold it against him that he lost to Alabama, who would probably be unbeaten and headed to a NC.

The only thing heisman voters want to avoid is another reggie bush, I don't see Manziel getting in any more NCAA trouble, NCAA isnt going to look at him again unless he did something absolutely ridiculous.

There are a lot more Quarterbacks who have been impressive this year than last, Manziel is in great shape to repeat, but lot o football left, should be an exciting storyline.

great year for college football!
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:16 am to
Taylor Kelly has better stats as plays in a BCS conference.
Posted by DWag215
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2011
7223 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:26 am to
quote:

A young man from Allen may very well outdo Johnny Manziel's HS stats. He's already ahead of Manziel's JUNIOR YEAR stats.

I expect Allen to be good, but the law of averages will likely prevent us from fielding consecutive QBs who transcend the game.

But just because I believe we won't be as good at the QB position doesn't mean I don't think we'll be elite at it. JFF stands on his own level. Allen can be several notches beneath him and still be very, very good.
Posted by DWag215
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2011
7223 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:28 am to
quote:

WAYYY more flops from the HS ranks top ranked or not at QB than successes....you're showing deep ignorance if you think it's a sure thing with Kyle Allen.

Recruiting isn't a science. Nothing is guaranteed for any team at any positoin.

Each program rolls the dice on kids. And when it comes to QBs, Allen is our absolute best bet for 2014.
Posted by Spirit Of Aggieland
Houston
Member since Aug 2011
4607 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:29 am to
Murray and McCarron are BOTH studs and are playing out of their minds. They, not JFF, should get the focus for Heisman.

I see A&M sticking with running the ball more in order to have success this year. Especially with a suspect D. Really happy to see how we finished out the Arky game.


Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55423 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:30 am to
yes, if he doesn't get hurt and doesn't win it will be out of spite.

He is the most exciting and creative(and lucky)QB in the history of the game, if you don't think so, you aren't watching the games.
Posted by DWag215
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2011
7223 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Except at defense. WHOOPS. Sorry we're taking all the DB's...

Except not at all.

We're absolutely loaded at DB in 2014. If we get Scott qualified, we'll land 2 of 3 best LBs in Texas. We're going to get Myles Garrett, a national top player at DE, and we've already got Texas' best interior DL in Dashawn Washington.

You don't have a clue.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95884 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Murray and McCarron are BOTH studs and are playing out of their minds. They, not JFF, should get the focus for Heisman.
Look, i know i will get bashed for this, but Mettenberger has been more impressive than Murray and McCarron
Posted by pabgolf
baton rouge
Member since Dec 2009
1901 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:36 am to
Yes, he is the best college football player and stats back it up as well.
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23136 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:38 am to
quote:

If you just go on pure stats Mariota is doing better.

High stats against no name opponents do not count when ya can't get the dubya...

Right LSU?


But the argument is that Manziel won't win it out of spite. If Mariota puts up video game numbers like Manziel, which he is doing so far (and sitting out most of the 2nd half and not doing anything when his team is up big), then he would have just as much claim as Manziel. Last year you could say "he's doing it against SEC defenses" but I'm not sure that applies this year, and many SEC fans would agree. If Oregon goes undefeated, he has a valid argument

Miller is not winning it, as he already sat out 2 full games so his stats can't get him even close to the numbers he needs. He needed a 3K/1K type season with 35 total TDs to be in the convo
Posted by BearBait09
Texas
Member since Aug 2013
2307 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:38 am to
Mettenberger had 1:47 to get his team a field goal. He failed. Murray took about that much time to get a needed touchdown.

LSU D > Georgia D is still the general consensus correct?

Mettenberger has not been more impressive than Murray. just stop.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95884 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Mettenberger had 1:47 to get his team a field goal. He failed. Murray took about that much time to get a needed touchdown.

LSU D > Georgia D is still the general consensus correct?

Mettenberger has not been more impressive than Murray. just stop.
Ugh, look, i think they are equally as good. But watching the game saturday, the windows Mett was throwing the ball into were ridiculous. Murray was throwing to wide open receivers all day. This isnt Murrays fault at all, but it led to Mett looking more impressive. It doesnt mean Mett is better, because im sure Murray could have made those throws as well. And your last drive argument it a terrible one for anyone with football knowledge. With over 4 minutes left, you have your entire playbook still open. With 1:45, you can no longer run the ball
This post was edited on 9/30/13 at 10:44 am
Posted by LSUJuice
Back in Houston
Member since Apr 2004
17678 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:45 am to
quote:

i know i will get bashed for this

As you should
quote:

Mettenberger has been more impressive than Murray

No
quote:

and McCarron

Maybe. But who cares. He had his one (slim) chance for a "moment" at Georgia, and he missed it.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter