Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:33 pm to cajunbama
quote:
will probably be even stronger in the long run because of it.
Nah. The conference will just start expelling whoever happens the cross the rest of the members that particular year.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:34 pm to RB10
quote:
Randomly vote out a good standing member,
Its not random and LSU is clearly not in good standing with anyone but its fans
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:34 pm to Boom33
The SEC has pinned themselves into a corner.
LSU is going to be pissed any way this comes out.
Other conferences will be calling
This isn't going to be over no matter how the vote comes out. Stay or Geaux
LSU is going to be pissed any way this comes out.
Other conferences will be calling
This isn't going to be over no matter how the vote comes out. Stay or Geaux
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:35 pm to cajunbama
quote:
Its not random and LSU is clearly not in good standing with anyone but its fans
Go on record? Make your stand. It's important we can find out who the benedict Arnolds are.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:37 pm to Veritas
This women looks like she has been embalmed for 20 years.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:37 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
TutHillTiger
Hey shite for brains.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:37 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Per its bylaws, the SEC can expel whomever for whatever. It'd probably be a bad look at this point to expel a founding member with no evidence of wrongdoing. They can do it though.
I’m assuming that bylaw was written before college sports became a multi billion dollar business
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:38 pm to 0
quote:
I’m assuming that bylaw was written before college sports became a multi billion dollar business
Likely. Seems the LA AG is interested in that angle as well.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:40 pm to 0
quote:
I’m assuming that bylaw was written before college sports became a multi billion dollar business
The SEC bylaws say “you can’t play and ineligible player” as well.
That got put to bed the moment Diego Pavia sued them and the NCAA for another year of eligibility based on limiting his earning potential.
Once money was involved, pretty much all of their rules became moot.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:42 pm to SidewalkTiger
Well at least Wolken admits it is deeply hypocritical of the SEC to finally draw a hard line.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:43 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
They can, but it'd be kind of a bad look at this point.
Wait a minute. Y'all love Lane's bad boy rebel bad look though
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:44 pm to cajunbama
quote:
Wait a minute. Y'all love Lane's bad boy rebel bad look though
I'm saying it'd be a bad look for the conference.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:47 pm to geauxbrown
Basically, for the reason you stated is why the SEC is subject to the Sherman Act. When you sign a $3B dollar media rights deal as a collective and are competing entities, you can bet your sweet little @$$ you’ll fall under the Sherman Act. Well, short of Congress giving you antitrust exemptions or bargaining with the players.
They don’t want to bargain with the players because they’ll give up a lot more than 20% of revenue.
He’s about as wrong as it gets. Wherever he’s getting his legal knowledge from, he needs to stop. He’s looked like a clown for the better part of 2 weeks now.
House v. NCAA: the SEC and the other Power 4 conference’s were specifically named in the suit. We all know they lost, which specifically says the NCAA and the conferences are subject to antitrust laws.
He’s the one saying the SEC’s First Amendment right of association would/should allow colleges to ban Black players if they wanted.
They don’t want to bargain with the players because they’ll give up a lot more than 20% of revenue.
He’s about as wrong as it gets. Wherever he’s getting his legal knowledge from, he needs to stop. He’s looked like a clown for the better part of 2 weeks now.
House v. NCAA: the SEC and the other Power 4 conference’s were specifically named in the suit. We all know they lost, which specifically says the NCAA and the conferences are subject to antitrust laws.
He’s the one saying the SEC’s First Amendment right of association would/should allow colleges to ban Black players if they wanted.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:49 pm to Veritas
quote:
So you want to go on the record of voting for LSU in or out?
Why?
Why do you care what my opinion on putting LSU out is?
I don't think they are going to be kicked, but I can see some suspensions and financial penalties first.
It totally depends on what the facts are and I don't believe for a second we know them yet. Kiffin does seem to have a talent for constantly pissing off his superior to the point of being fired over and over again though.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:49 pm to Boom33
Please, please read the House v. NCAA decision. Maybe then you won’t look so much like a clown.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:51 pm to cajunbama
quote:
Why?
Why do you care what my opinion on putting LSU out is?
I don't think they are going to be kicked, but I can see some suspensions and financial penalties first.
It totally depends on what the facts are and I don't believe for a second we know them yet. Kiffin does seem to have a talent for constantly pissing off his superior to the point of being fired over and over again though.
I'm asking you do you want LSU kicked out or not. And Yes a list is being kept.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:51 pm to Veritas
quote:
they are signing on to their own death warrant.
k
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:53 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Nah. The conference will just start expelling whoever happens the cross the rest of the members that particular year.
Yeah, for absolutely nothing. Clearly nothing egregious happened here to make this a first in nearly 100 year history of the SEC
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:54 pm to TigerTiger12914
quote:
LSU is going to be pissed any way this comes out.
Oh, no. Do you think they will take there ball and go home
Page 8 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News