
Started By
Message
re: For anyone interested: Louisiana AG makes radio appearance to break down case
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:52 pm to wdhalgren
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:52 pm to wdhalgren
quote:
After listening to that, she's done her homework. The individual member schools of the SEC should think long and hard before they proceed with this. The risks (to the SEC and the individual institutions) of backing down are much lower than the risks of taking this to court.
Louisiana’s AG is actually fantastic.
I think most people want both sides to take the temperature down.
LSU has done that now twice while Sankey is amending the SEC’s suit and is moving to consolidate authority to expel LSU.
One side is taking steps to lower the temp and the other side is throwing fuel on the fire.
Sanky is the problem.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:53 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Because that Baton Rouge judge already decided the SEC was worthless…
Ahh yes that MS and Alabama Judge didn’t do anything like this huh?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:54 pm to Boom33
quote:
Ok, what would the lawsuits be for?
Same exact thing Chambliss and Pavia sued them for.
You can’t actually be this stupid.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:56 pm to Boom33
quote:
The only reason LSU didn't break the rule is because the SEC filed the lawsuit.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
Kiffin said he wanted rules and that he would follow league rules before the SEC filed.
You’re full of shite.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:36 pm to RB10
quote:
Same exact thing Chambliss and Pavia sued them for.
You can’t actually be this stupid.
They sued the NCAA.
for eligibility.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:37 pm to ibldprplgld
quote:
Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
Kiffin said he wanted rules and that he would follow league rules before the SEC filed.
You’re full of shite.
You're leaving out the IF of his statement.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:07 pm to Boom33
quote:
They sued the NCAA.
So did the 22 players. It was the SEC that tried to flex that brought them into the discussion
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:09 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
So did the 22 players. It was the SEC that tried to flex that brought them into the discussion
By flex you mean tried to uphold a standard that the rest of the conference wanted.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:17 pm to Veritas
quote:
No, I am asking you to tell me what SEC rule LSU broke that warrants a vote to expel them.
Or are you implying the SEC should just be able to do this whenever they want when a member does not violate SEC rules? That's really the type of league you want?
Are you implying that the SEC can not kick a member out if it chooses?
What if its something along the lines of something as conduct unbecoming a member institution?
Maybe they can't. But I would think they could.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:17 pm to cajunbama
quote:
Are you implying that the SEC can not kick a member out if it chooses?
What if its something along the lines of something as conduct unbecoming a member institution?
Maybe they can't. But I would think they could.
They can, but it'd be kind of a bad look at this point.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:25 pm to Veritas
quote:
Tried what? Recruited "Pro Players" under a court order granting them eligibility? Just like Ole Miss and South Carolina?
What are we even talking about?
The game of chicken of "I don't care if I belong to your organization, I don't like your rules and if I get a court that says I don't have too I won't, but you can't kick me out."
And no, LSU didn't play them but they also didn't just comply and go along with the SEC rule. This has been fought.
It does seem to imply there is info that hasn't made it to the public yet. If there is not, maybe this is where the member institutions decided to take stand.
Only one school and fanbase is kicking and screaming about having to follow the rules right now for some reason
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:26 pm to SidewalkTiger
He’s not joking. Ask him how long it took Mississippi to ratify the 13th amendment.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:28 pm to Veritas
quote:
This is not the levelheaded leadership this conference needs.
Yeah, just look at LSU and Louisiana leadership. That's what the SEC needs
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:28 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
She says there's no evidence that LSU actually did anything, all the allegations in the pleading are from second and thirdhand news stories or somebody on Twitter saying something, no real evidence of anything
This is the part I find fascinating. They orchestrated the vote without actually knowing for sure what anyone with LSU did wrong.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:29 pm to cajunbama
quote:
The game of chicken of "I don't care if I belong to your organization, I don't like your rules and if I get a court that says I don't have too I won't, but you can't kick me out."
And no, LSU didn't play them but they also didn't just comply and go along with the SEC rule. This has been fought.
It does seem to imply there is info that hasn't made it to the public yet. If there is not, maybe this is where the member institutions decided to take stand.
Only one school and fanbase is kicking and screaming about having to follow the rules right now for some reason
So you want to go on the record of voting for LSU in or out?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:30 pm to 0
quote:
This is the part I find fascinating. They orchestrated the vote without actually knowing for sure what anyone with LSU did wrong.
Per its bylaws, the SEC can expel whomever for whatever. It'd probably be a bad look at this point to expel a founding member with no evidence of wrongdoing.
They can do it though.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:30 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
So, your stance is that LSU fans talking smack on the Internet is proof that LSU was invovled in wrongdoing.
Who says they need court of law proof
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:32 pm to Veritas
quote:
acknowledging the damage this does to the conference.
The conference will be fine and will probably be even stronger in the long run because of it.
LSU on the other hand
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:32 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Per its bylaws, the SEC can expel whomever for whatever. It'd probably be a bad look at this point to expel a founding member with no evidence of wrongdoing.
They can do it though.
they are signing on to their own death warrant.
They are following the lead of this persoon

Popular
Back to top



0






