Started By
Message
Every fan of every team needs to take a step back.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:47 pm
I have no idea what will happen with any of these lawsuits. But regardless of any of the outcomes, I think it’s clear that Greg Sankey will not be in control much longer.
This falls on him 100%. It would have been easy to make these “rules” the moment the 5 for 5 ruling came out. Instead he waits and waits and waits. And only after something happens he decides “we gotta do something”.
And here we are now 2 days before the start of the season, and he’s shown he is clearly in over his head.
The SEC needs LSU just as much as LSU needs the SEC. This is the truth for all of the teams (except Texas AM, sec really doesn’t need them since we have their big brother).
This falls on him 100%. It would have been easy to make these “rules” the moment the 5 for 5 ruling came out. Instead he waits and waits and waits. And only after something happens he decides “we gotta do something”.
And here we are now 2 days before the start of the season, and he’s shown he is clearly in over his head.
The SEC needs LSU just as much as LSU needs the SEC. This is the truth for all of the teams (except Texas AM, sec really doesn’t need them since we have their big brother).
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:49 pm to The Eric
quote:
The SEC needs LSU
We’ll be fine without the stolen children’s hospital money, thanks.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:50 pm to The Eric
“Do you hate LSU?”
“Abstain.”
That’s the commissioner of the SEC.
“Abstain.”
That’s the commissioner of the SEC.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:50 pm to Projectpat
quote:
We’ll be fine without the stolen children’s hospital money, thanks.
The only reason we even brought you guys into the fold was to try and bring in the LGBTQ fans. Don’t you have yell practice?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:51 pm to The Eric
The SEC doesn't need any member. LSU thought they were above reproach. They learned differently this morning
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:52 pm to ColoradoAg
quote:
The SEC doesn't need any member. LSU thought they were above reproach. They learned differently this morning
The PAC 10/12 didn’t need any team either. Until they did.
Sankey will be out this time next year.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:54 pm to The Eric
quote:
It would have been easy to make these “rules” the moment the 5 for 5 ruling came out. Instead he waits and waits and waits. And only after something happens he decides “we gotta do something”.
And here we are now 2 days before the start of the season, and he’s shown he is clearly in over his head.
Sankey's had so many chances to be proactive and failed to do so. Now all of a sudden it's a holy war against LSU, who by the way 1) isn't suing the SEC and 2) isn't the only team recruiting 5th year guys who went to an NFL camp. Even the biggest LSU haters on here have to admit something's not adding up.
Hell, you have teams planning to play guys Saturday who are currently deemed ineligible by the NCAA. Sankey is fine with letting them because of a judge's order, but he's ready to put his career on the line against this other judge's order?
Wild times.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:00 pm to The Eric
quote:
This falls on him 100%. It would have been easy to make these “rules” the moment the 5 for 5 ruling came out. Instead he waits and waits and waits. And only after something happens he decides “we gotta do something”.
If your dog don't shite in the house you grow to expect your dog to not shite in the house. When you wake up one morning to a pile of dog shite in the house you gotta do something about the dog shite in the house....even when the entirety of your experience in life lead you to believe that the issue of the dog shitting / not shitting in the house was settled and no matter the circumstances it was unthinkable that the dog would suddenly shite in the house.
Not once in the history of college sports could an athlete without any eligibility left under any rule have more than a flirtation with becoming a pro athlete in the same sport and then come back to the college ranks. The 5 for 5 rule certainly changed for anyone who did not have a significant flirtation with the NFL but I am not sure it addressed those who had said flirtation. I think the courts will eventually say that they are eligible....and I think it will apply from now on and for any player who has any eligibility left regardless of how they flirted with the NFL and even if they had an ongoing romance and even a consecrated marriage with the NFL because I do not think you can deny a person their ability to ply their trade. Its a brave new world once again....the next thing to be addressed is ANY limitation of eligibility AT ALL. Including academic eligibility.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:00 pm to The Eric
quote:
The SEC needs LSU just as much as LSU needs the SEC

Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:01 pm to The Eric
quote:
The SEC needs LSU
No we really dont.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:04 pm to RidiculousHype
quote:
Sankey's had so many chances to be proactive and failed to do so. Now all of a sudden it's a holy war against LSU, who by the way 1) isn't suing the SEC and 2) isn't the only team recruiting 5th year guys who went to an NFL camp. Even the biggest LSU haters on here have to admit something's not adding up.
Hell, you have teams planning to play guys Saturday who are currently deemed ineligible by the NCAA. Sankey is fine with letting them because of a judge's order, but he's ready to put his career on the line against this other judge's order?
Wild times.
LSU and Kiffin opened this can is the likely difference.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:06 pm to The Eric
quote:
Every fan of every team needs to take a step back

Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:11 pm to The Eric
quote:
I think it’s clear that Greg Sankey will not be in control much longer.
I think this would be true if he and the SEC didn't file the countersuit today.
quote:
And only after something happens he decides “we gotta do something”
Nothing needed to be done until LSU and Kiffin forced the SEC's hand. The NCAA's 5 for 5 rule was implemented many months after the athletes in question left college and its common sense that athletes that turn pro should not be allowed to return based on a new rule that wasn't in place while they were in college.
quote:
he’s shown he is clearly in over his head.
Maybe so, but I think LSU is more in over their heads than y'all realize. Non-Baton Rouge judges have already set a precedent through the Texas Tech/Sorsby proceedings that athletic conferences are private, voluntary associations with the legal right to enforce their own standards of integrity. A TRO doesn't prevent the SEC from enforcing its own rules, especially those that were voted on by voting members from its member institutions.
quote:
The SEC needs LSU just as much as LSU needs the SEC
I don't want to see y'all kicked out. Y'all are a fun rival and a good athletic program and have produced some of the best and most fun college sports teams ever. This really feels like a situation where LSU needs to not poke the bear - the general public doesn't want this and your fellow SEC schools don't want this. Why continue pursuing it?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:13 pm to The Eric
quote:
Every fan of every team needs to take a step back.
First they need to walk up the edge of a cliff and turn around.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:14 pm to The Eric
quote:
The SEC needs LSU just as much as LSU needs the SEC.
I doubt it. LSU/Louisiana isn't even in the top5 for viewership in the SEC.
Alabama: 8.14 million
Georgia: 7.35 million
Tennessee: 7.03 million
Texas: 7.01 million
Oklahoma: 6.64 million
LSU: 6.42 millions
Florida: 5.16 million
Ole Miss: 4.38 million
USC: 4.15 million
Vandy 3.95 million
Auburn 3.89 million
A&M 3.86 million
Mizzou 3.13 million
Arkansas 2.45 million
Kentucky 2.11 million
Miss St 1.78 million
I doubt the SEC just wants to kick LSU out or anything like that. But to claim the SEC needs LSU is laughable.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:16 pm to The Eric
quote:
The SEC needs LSU
Oh no! What would this conference do without a midsize, terrible academic school located in the most dangerous college city in the conference, and statistically the worst state in the conference? I guess we will lose the tiny market that is Louisiana and its minuscule GDP.
Without LSU, almost every positive metric you could judge this conference by increases (academics, campus safety, etc.).
Popular
Back to top

21












