Favorite team:Georgia 
Location:CSRA
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:Engineet
Number of Posts:14770
Registered on:1/3/2023
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I’m out. It’s too draining to debate the states executing people when the state has proven time and again to be inept with people who are convinced the state is unable to get anything but executing people right. To be that person you have to simply have an insatiable blood lust. That is an issue that would take years and years of treatment by an army if professionals to cure. Y’all enjoy the state executing people in our names. The data is abundant and readily available that they can’t be trusted to do so but your bloodlust is more important. Bless your hearts.
quote:

I am firmly in favor of holding criminals accountable and not making excuses for them.


I agree completely. Hold criminals responsible and don’t make excuses for them. When the prosecution, from the initial police investigator to the da, pa, judge and defense attorneys commit crimes they absolutely should be held accountable. When the system fails to protect children and some of those children grow up to commit heinous crimes, which is what happened in this case, with the adult who committed the heinous crime being just barely an adult while the other 2 involved were a few months younger and not sentenced to death, the criminals who failed society, the victim, and the person convicted, should be held accountable as well. They never are and as a society we are fine with that. That’s a sickness.
If you’re looking for a capital conviction less than 20 years old that has been vacated due to DNA evidence it’s going to be rare because it takes 20-30 years to get the justice system to admit they’ve made a mistake. If you’re looking for a case where exculpatory evidence was withheld by the prosecution and the defense was too dumb to ask for it OR the prosecution simply decided to break the law they are too numerous to list. This one took
me about 90 seconds…George Rhodes.


For a capital conviction go with Alvarez in Texas.

That one took about 20 seconds to find.

It’s almost impossible to prove prosecutorial misconduct because the state ensures it’s almost impossible to prove they’re made a mistake. There is NO penalty for it when it is proven, 20-30 years after the fact it 1 day, because the prosecutors and the state both have immunity for violating the law and even civil rights unless the damaged party has a pile of cash and time. It happens everyday in the US. If it happens once every 100 years it is too often.
quote:

so your belief in the rights of women to make "private and personal medical decisions" is tied to whether or not fathers are paying child support?


No, I am explicitly stating, without reserve, that it takes 2 to tango. It also takes money and emotional support to bring the result of that tango into the realm of contributing adulthood. The courts and our society in general sentence the woman who has tangoed to a lifetime of emotional support of the child without much in the way of financial support on the part of the man who tangoed. If the rolls are reversed, and they are sometimes, then the woman should be forced to financially support the child. If neither parent is willing to support the child financially and emotionally they should both be imprisoned and forced to do so as well as pay for their own imprisonment.
quote:

I hear you, but NO ONE is arguing this woman's guilt. She did it. She bragged to people that she did it. She kept a piece of the victim's skull as a souvenir. The state got this one correct. Proceed with the penalty.


So intentionally do not read or try to know anything about why the state is executing someone because the story is ALWAYS the same and it’s an indictment of us as a nation and a society that I know full well we are proud of because we do nothing to change it.


This woman was 18 at the time she killed this woman. She had been raped and sodomized from the day she was born and the state was well aware and did NOTHING to prevent it or make her life bearable. Nothing. Failed at every opportunity and they were ample. As they always are. When she committed this heinous act the state saw a way to remove her and their culpability….and ours as a society… from the collective conscious. And that’s what it’s ALWAYS about. No she should not be executed but the fricking DA who decided not to prosecute the men who were orally raping her at 6 months of age? Yes, they should be….or they should at least be in prison with her. Instead their brethren see fit to cover up their professions sins….under the guise of justice. I know most of you deplore the idea of the EPA telling companies that they can’t cause rivers to catch on fire but I never cease to be appalled at the thought of you being fine with the states collusion with child abusers and child molestors and punishing the child when the chile inevitably commits some heinous crime. Y’all are sick and you’re enabling a sick and twisted society.
quote:

If you want to be against the death penalty, be against it because of the insanely unfair and unreasonable way it is applied.


This is the other reason it should be abolished.

This case is a great example. This woman was 18 at the time. Her murdering friends who were also convicted were 17. They were not tried for capital murder for the same crime because they were A few months younger.
quote:

the only way a person can be wrongly convicted beyond a reasonable doubt would be some type of intentional malfeasance on the part of law enforcement which would have to include other departments such as the prosecutors office, judge, and third party auditors.



It happens all the time my friend. They have exculpatory evidence of the sort you list and simply do not acknowledge it. Happens all the time.
quote:

while you're casually advocating for the execution of babies in the womb?


I doing no such thing. I am advocating for individuals to be allowed to make private and personal medical decisions aided by advice from medical professionals without the state interfering. I don’t like the idea of abortion, I like the idea of babies and human beings. What I like is not a matter of concern to anyone but me. I will never seek an abortion because I am a man.

But here is a swap I’m willing to make. It is EASY to prover who fathered a child today. If we agree to make abortion illegal in all but extreme cases like the life of the mother, incest and rape, we should require that the father support that child in total until that child is a contributor to society….or until the father dies of old age. If the father earns enough money they can pay for every penny. If they don’t they can go to a debtors prison and dig ditches and whatever they are capable of until the child is a contributor OR the father dies, whichever comes first. Or we can allow women and their doctors to make medical decisions that are none of anyone’s business other than them.
The state has claimed to have gotten it right 209 times out of 8000 when the state was simply wrong and was demonstrably wrong. No one is arguing whether she is guilty or not mainly because the state has convicted her just like they did 209 times out of 8000. I know nothing about this case at all, if she committed the crime she was convicted of in the courtroom in front of everyone involved in her conviction, from the judge to the janitor, I do not trust them to get it correct, sorry, it’s far too important a decision for the same people who manage the DMV to make. The impact to society in them getting it wrong, and they do far too often, is far greater than what this animal did. What this animal did impacts the victim, the family and the community. The state executing the wrong person impacts the same people directly and makes it all to obvious to all but the anti social types among us that the state simply can’t be trusted. If she is as guilty as you say, and I am not doubting it, life in prison is plenty of punishment to prevent the state from possibly executing the wrong person OR executing the right person but cutting corners to do so. There is no crime heinous enough to justify the states actions in MOST convictions….the things that prosecutors and judges do, not to mention the police, are infinitely more heinous because they commit their atrocities in our name and with the support of the state. Clean that up and I for one would reconsider. Continue to allow those abuses and atrocities and I will never support the state executing anyone.
quote:

so like i said, you're just a dickhead. and wrong.



The longer we baby these sick bastards the more people they will kill. I’m not the dickhead here, that’d be those still supporting the state killing people and those afraid to tell them they are sick bastards
quote:

But you're pro-abortion, right?


This is one of those people who get hard as Chinese algebra when fantasizing about executions. They equate a medical procedure that is a decision made by an individual and their medical professionals with the state executing people when there is no doubt that the state has executed the wrong person. Most likely also claims to be a Christian and believe in a god of some sort. And there are MILLIONS of them….
quote:

It shouldn’t be this hard



It should be so hard for the state to kill anyone that when the state does so and the person is later proven not to have been guilty of the crime they were convicted of that everyone, police, eyewitnesses, judges, DAs and jurors should all be imprisoned for the rest of their natural lives. If the person is actually executed and then exonerated everyone involved should summarily be executed….there is no doubt that they were involved in the murder of an innocent person. That would put an immediate end to executing people capriciously
quote:

i agree with the argument you are making, but you are not goign to win many people to your side by saying that everyone who is pro death penalty is so because they are in some sort of dirty quasi voyeuristic way excited about imagining the government killing someone. that just makes you a dickhead. and also wrong.


The only answer that is plausible, given the amount of data available, for anyone to support the state murdering people, is that the idea of the state doing something they can’t is titillating. It’s no longer possible that they can claim not to know how often the state wrongfully convicts….they enjoy the idea of other people suffering. We have been Molly coddling and babying them for about 20 years or so and they still love the idea of executing people. Shaming them so t change their minds but it will drive them back into the dark recesses and out of site of decent folks and we can put an end to the barbaric practice of executions for the enjoyment of a small number of sick bastards among us. It is the ONLY reason executions have ever taken place…. So a small number of truly sick frickers can have a moment
quote:

I think the death penalty should change. If there is evidence without a shadow of a doubt that a person did something, kill them, and kill them with a firing squad right after they walk out of their last appeal court date. If guilt is debatable to a logical group of people or jury, no death penalty. The threshold of evidence should be extremely high, and the process for killing them extremely fast.


Most liberals oppose capital punishment. Most conservatives think there is NOTHING the state is capable of doing. You’d think this would be a bipartisan idea….stop allowing the state to execute people. The problem is conservatives, who think the state can do nothing right, immediately change their mind when it comes to the state killing folks. It’s the damndest thing. There is no way in hell we should allow, let alone encourage, the state killing people in our names. They manage the DMV for fricks sale. They “patch” potholes for fricks sake. They run schools and they do all of that poorly but killing folks???? Oh yeah, THAT they are incapable of doing poorly.
quote:

It works 100% of the time for the person that committed the crime.



What is the % of the time it works when the state murders the wrong person 2.5% of the time? I know, I know - people have always loved a good hanging or beheading. It’s is incredibly exciting to imagine the state doing what you are forbidden to do and that is kill someone but for sane people knowing that 2.5% of those convicted of capital crimes since the early 70a, as it turns out, not guilty. Go figure. Having the same people who manage the DMV, the state, executing people, is barbaric.
It’s beyond time to abolish capital punishment in the US. There have been 8000+ people sentenced to death since it was reinstated in the early 70s. About 2000 have been executed. 209 have been exonerated. Not released on technicalities or retried but NOT guilty of the crime they were convicted of. 2.5% of the people the state said committed a crime and sentenced to death? Turns out - not guilty. That may mean 50 of the 2000 executed were also innocent. I know that executing innocent people makes some of you hard as Chinese algebra but for normal people the fact that the state wrongly convicts and sentences 2.5%, at least, of the people they claim were guilty of capital crimes is enough to be concerning to say the least. 1 is too many. 209 out of 8000 is ridiculous
But Pawl they ain’t played nobody…..
On the surface this seems like a bad idea but stick with me here. There are about 110,000 people at UT home games and maybe 100,000 of those are UT fans. Cheap beer at sporting events is a known quantity. The odds of them getting drunk and fighting with one another is 10X greater than them fighting with opposing fans. When they do get to fighting with one another they either get tossed in jail or the hospital. Either way the fewer UT fans in the stadium the better the experience for Eerybody
I do not and would not ever have one so.....
quote:

I laughed my arse off watching the piss and miss

But the UT I was like thats wrong


getting old.....