Started By
Message
re: Clemson needs to be a part of a 16 team SEC
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:34 am to Cockopotamus
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:34 am to Cockopotamus
okay why, cock?
1
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:35 am to Gladius Veritas
Frick Clemson. Go grab UNC and FSU before we even think about Clemson
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:35 am to Glory2Him
We already own the South Carolina market. Clemson brings nothing but a difficult game, and not even that much money. Which, by the way, is what this expansion is all about.
Nobody disagrees that Clemson has the fans and tradition similar to an SEC school, but it's all about $$$. The SEC will expand with a team from a state that isn't in the SEC already. North Carolina, Virginia, etc.
Nobody disagrees that Clemson has the fans and tradition similar to an SEC school, but it's all about $$$. The SEC will expand with a team from a state that isn't in the SEC already. North Carolina, Virginia, etc.
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:36 am to blkhawktiger
UNC isn't SEC material. But I get the TV market footprint idea.
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:36 am to Gladius Veritas
quote:
Although if we do, TCU and UNC would be great picks
Our best options are all in the east.
Adding another texas team wouldn't benefit us as much as adding someone from North Carolina and Virginia/West Virginia.
I'm with you on UNC . . don't know if I want to trash up the conference with West Virgina or Va Tech. But UofV would be a prestigious add.
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:36 am to Glory2Him
quote:
anyone agree?
Not no but frick no.
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:39 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
No. Weird bunch of fricks. Only room for one group of crazy arse holes that wear purple in this conference.
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:39 am to DaleDenton
quote:Just wanted to call you out and remind everybody that you predicted UNC would beat us.
DaleDenton
Good call, dickbag! 
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:40 am to scrooster
Might as well get the cream of the crop in NC. Go for Duke and UNC and move Mizzou to the West.
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:41 am to Glory2Him
No more Tigers. No more football schools. UNC and Duke are the best candidates.
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:41 am to Glory2Him
no more Tigers
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:41 am to Glory2Him
I agree with dumping Mizzou and Arky.
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:42 am to Glory2Him
no
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:43 am to dallasga6
Georgia Southern
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:44 am to genro
quote:
add Clemson, Georgia Tech, and Florida State.
I've seen other mention bringing Ga. Tech. Not sure I understand why people would want them. I am NOT a Tech hater...but why do several on here think they would be a good add? They have a small stadium and have a hard time filling it up. Rarely have noteworthy teams, although, they do occasionally...why?
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:44 am to Shockley03
quote:
Might as well get the cream of the crop in NC. Go for Duke and UNC and move Mizzou to the West.
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:44 am to POCKET
There are more sports than football.
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:44 am to Glory2Him
when the SEC added Mizz and TAMU it was about expanding their digital foot print..Any fan that does not understand this concept is pretty naive at best. So adding Clempson, GA Tech, FSU , and TCU does not expand this footprint.
Kapish?
Kapish?
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:45 am to Kentucker
quote:
UNC and Duke are the best candidates.
Wow. Kentucky, UNC, Duke..Florida. Pretty powerful basketball conference..
Page 2 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News