Started By
Message

Charles Bediako - Bama G-League Player and other "pro" players from other SEC teams

Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:27 pm
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
58465 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:27 pm
Just pointing out the hypocrisy of the SEC, with a few examples of the things LSU absolutely did not do, but is threatening expulsion for not doing but hurting the feelings of Sankey/SEC and some posters.

Sound familiar?

quote:

Bediako’s lawsuit argued that the explosion of NIL deals and direct school revenue-sharing (enabled by the House settlement that took effect in 2025) changed the financial reality of college basketball. He claimed he never would have left Alabama and declared for the draft in 2023 if he had known players could earn substantial compensation while remaining student-athletes. NIL existed when he left, but the scale of money and the new direct payments from schools were not yet in place


quote:

He also pointed to inconsistency: the NCAA had granted eligibility to dozens of other players with professional experience (G League, European leagues, etc.), including some with draft ties or prior pro contracts (e.g., James Nnaji at Baylor). Bediako’s side argued the rules were being applied arbitrarily and that denying him eligibility while allowing others violated antitrust principles and harmed his NIL value (which depends on playing).


and the extreme hypocrisy from some bama fans. The only difference, is we never rostered the players. Bama went ahead, rostered, and played him.

quote:

Jan. 21, 2026: Judge James H. Roberts Jr. granted a temporary restraining order (TRO), making Bediako immediately eligible. He played five games for Alabama (averaging roughly 10.0 points, 4.6 rebounds, and 1.4 blocks; Alabama went 3-2 in those games). Roberts later recused himself after it emerged he was an Alabama athletics donor.



quote:

During hearings it also emerged that Bediako had signed an NIL deal upon re-enrolling and was receiving revenue-share money from Alabama. His attorneys said he had earned only about $530,000 across three G League seasons (far less than top college NIL/revenue-share packages), and that playing was essential to maximizing his NIL value


Meanwhile, Bediako is ignored by the pundits, but Harris getting $500 to cover gas to try out for the saints and never rostering makes him a pro?

And here are the CURRENT "pro players" and the teams they are joining, that are suing to be allowed to play, that the SEC is NOT threatening expulsion:

Texas A&M
quote:

Rylan Griffen (Texas A&M) — Guard seeking a fifth season (Class of 2022). He was granted a TRO in Brazos County (and earlier in Dallas County) against the NCAA and SEC. He is enrolled, listed on the Texas A&M roster, and eligible under the TRO. An injunction hearing has been delayed; one recent report points to a new date around October 28, 2026. He played in NBA Summer League but did not sign a contract


Missouri

quote:

Mark Mitchell (Missouri) — Forward (two-time All-SEC) seeking a fifth season. He was temporarily eligible under a Kentucky court order that was later dissolved by the Kentucky Court of Appeals in early October 2026, making him ineligible again. He is pursuing further relief (Missouri coach Dennis Gates has attended hearings). He agreed to (but did not sign) an Exhibit 10 contract. Status remains in limbo pending new court action


quote:

CJ Gunn (Missouri) — Transfer guard from DePaul seeking a fifth season. A Boone County, Missouri judge granted him a TRO on October 14, 2026, making him temporarily eligible to play for the Tigers. The order is short-term (until around October 24), when a more permanent injunction will be considered. He was also part of a prior Texas (Dallas County) TRO.


Auburn
quote:

Mantas Rubštavicius (also spelled Rubstavicius), an Auburn basketball wing/forward.
On Wednesday, October 14, 2026, the Lithuanian transfer/signee filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against the NCAA in an Alabama court (Lee County). He is seeking immediate eligibility for the 2026-27 season after the NCAA denied his requests and Auburn’s final appeal (denied September 29).
Key details:

He previously played professionally in Lithuania and left his club with a significant contractual buyout (reportedly €300,000).
Auburn supports his right to seek legal clarity but has said it continues to support the SEC’s rules on former professionals.
He missed Auburn’s exhibition game against Florida State on October 14 while awaiting clearance (another international signee, Narcisse Ngoy, was recently cleared).
A hearing was set for Friday, October 16.


Texas

quote:

Basketball

Chendall Weaver (former Texas guard) — Played his final seasons at Texas after transferring from UT-Arlington. He joined lawsuits seeking a fifth year under the new five-for-five rules. He received eligibility relief via court action but could not return to Texas because the Longhorns’ roster was already full (15 players). He signed with Houston. As of mid-October 2026, reports indicated his eligibility was still in limbo and he was not cleared to play in an exhibition.
Jordan Pope (former Texas guard) — Played two seasons at Texas (after Oregon State) and was part of the Sweet 16 team. He was involved in fifth-year eligibility lawsuits/injunctions. With no roster space at Texas, he committed to Texas A&M for the extra year.

Football

Cole Hutson (former Texas offensive lineman) — Filed a lawsuit in Travis County seeking a fifth season after the five-for-five rules excluded the Class of 2022. Coach Steve Sarkisian publicly addressed the situation and noted the potential for an extra year.


Ole Miss

quote:

Cory Stephenson

At FIU in 2025-26 he averaged 18.0 points and 6.4 rebounds while shooting nearly 40% from three. He also played at Cal State Bakersfield and a junior college earlier.
After going undrafted in the 2026 NBA Draft, he signed (or was reported to have signed) an Exhibit 10 contract with the Detroit Pistons and appeared in four Summer League games. Later reporting suggested he may not have officially finalized a binding Exhibit 10 deal.

Eligibility issues

He is a plaintiff in Glancey v. NCAA (a California case challenging the NCAA’s exclusion of the Class of 2022 from the new five-for-five eligibility model). A temporary restraining order has protected his eligibility at times.
The SEC’s professionalism rules (barring players who signed certain pro contracts or appeared on pro rosters) raised questions about whether Ole Miss could roster him. Coach Chris Beard has stated that Stephenson did not sign a binding pro contract and is currently eligible under the court order protecting him.
As of early October 2026, his TRO was set to run through at least a continued preliminary-injunction hearing around October 20. Ole Miss listed him on its roster

This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 2:59 pm
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
112120 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

BugAC

Posted by JayAg
Member since Jun 2021
16648 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:33 pm to
Wade needs to be suspended
Posted by cfotiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
900 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:43 pm to
Well done, well researched and well written.

Just plain facts and yet almost nobody will admit Stankey has a personal vendetta against LSU.

You are right on; yet, the SEC has no issues with the other SEC schools who violated SEC rules and faced zero consequences.

College football has already been irreparably damaged by there being no caps on NIL and now Stankey is doing his best to destroy the SEC.
Posted by GhostofAlfredBlue
Member since Nov 2023
412 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:47 pm to
Hold on now....... i was told that if a school gained a competitive edge due to a "boosters" actions with or without the University knowing... that means the school should get hammered and beg for the NCAA not to death penalty them?
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
17010 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:48 pm to
Of those the only one that's really analogous is Bediako, who was off the team so quickly there really wasn't much to do.

At some point y'all really have to stop crying.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
58465 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

You are right on; yet, the SEC has no issues with the other SEC schools who violated SEC rules and faced zero consequences.

College football has already been irreparably damaged by there being no caps on NIL and now Stankey is doing his best to destroy the SEC.


Just to further emphasize the soon defeat/dismissal of the SEC's lawsuit. According to AG Murrill, SEC lawyers contacted LSU lawyers (not the AG) stating that the only way they will dismiss the lawsuit is if a joint statement is prepared where LSU admits it did something wrong.

SEC has never listed a single thing that LSU has done something wrong. Not 1 listed example, which just further proves this entire lawsuit is cooked up by Sankey and is being perpetuated solely to save face for his soon embarrassment and firing.
Posted by theballguy
HSV (Dealing only in satire)
Member since Oct 2011
44229 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

At some point y'all really have to stop crying.



Good luck with that
Posted by IM_4_LSU
McKinney, TX
Member since Mar 2014
15291 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:50 pm to
trolling make you feel better about yourself and your team?
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
41985 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:51 pm to
quote:


SEC has never listed a single thing that LSU has done something wrong. Not 1 listed example, which just further proves this entire lawsuit is cooked up by Sankey and is being perpetuated solely to save face for his soon embarrassment and firing.


You mean except for the direct claims in the lawsuit right?

Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
58465 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Of those the only one that's really analogous is Bediako, who was off the team so quickly there really wasn't much to do.


But how is LSU, who has not rostered anyone, more egregious and threatened for expulsion when Bama actually rostered a g-league player? We were threatened with punitive damages if we even rostered our guys. Bama was allowed to roster, pay, and nothing happened.

This is why SEC will lose this lawsuit.

AND, LSU has not sued a single person regarding this.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
58465 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

You mean except for the direct claims in the lawsuit right?



What direct claims? LSU has not rostered a single person. So please, prove harm.

Sankey works for the SEC presidents, not the other way around. The Presidents decided not to vote on expulsion because the players were not rostered. So why is the SEC continuing with this?
This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 3:01 pm
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
40204 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Just plain facts and yet almost nobody will admit Stankey has a personal vendetta against LSU.
I have said from the get go that LSU was being singled out over other teams seemingly doing the same things. I can be objective regardless of my like or dislike of something (like I don't like LSU - but I do or did get to know some of your baseball fans over at Hoover at the RV park).
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9914 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:04 pm to
Bediako is the only comparable example and that shite got struck down pretty quickly.

Then this summer Alabama signed off on stiff penalties should they do it in the future.

LSU should sign off on that like Alabama.
This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 3:05 pm
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
58465 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

I have said from the get go that LSU was being singled out over other teams seemingly doing the same things.


Case in point, i just added Cory Stephenson from Ole MIss. Same exact situation. But why not consistent threats from SEC/Sankey?

SEC is going to lose publicly in court, and will lose again when Wright/Harris sue them for loss of revenue.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
76398 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

Then this summer Alabama signed off on stiff penalties should they do it in the future.

LSU should signed off on that like Alabama


Not sure why you keep saying this, members don't have to "sign off" on penalties. They just have to be adopted through a vote, which these were.
Posted by Pickle_Weasel
Member since Mar 2016
5890 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:07 pm to
TL;DR downvoted anyways.

Also: MELT
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
76398 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Of those the only one that's really analogous is Bediako, who was off the team so quickly there really wasn't much to do.

At some point y'all really have to stop crying


He was on the team long enough to play 5 games. Wright/Harris were never even formally signed.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9914 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:11 pm to
Maybe LSU should make the vote 16-0 instead of abstaining and see if that does anything to convince other SEC leaders questioning their commitment to it?

Just spitballing here.
Posted by cfotiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
900 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:13 pm to
LOL, did he not play in some regular season games? It was a clear violation of SEC rules.

LSU didn't play or even roster the players in question.

Who is the crier here?





Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•Twitter