
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:15 pm to wm72
quote:
Maybe LSU should make the vote 16-0 instead of abstaining and see if that does anything to convince other SEC leaders questioning their commitment to it?
Just spitballing here.
They can't, the vote has already happened. It seems LSU is content to just let the conference chase its tail in court.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:20 pm to BugAC
Give it time.
Lane will give the SEC office a good rogering, and it will all work out.
Sankey will need a anoplasty.
Lane will give the SEC office a good rogering, and it will all work out.
Sankey will need a anoplasty.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:21 pm to BugAC
quote:
What direct claims? LSU has not rostered a single person. So please, prove harm.
Sankey works for the SEC presidents, not the other way around. The Presidents decided not to vote on expulsion because the players were not rostered. So why is the SEC continuing with this?
The SEC filed the lawsuit before, not after.
And your 2nd paragraph is your mystery.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:38 pm to BugAC
They know it's true that's why the dumbasses downvoted.
They hate with every fiber in their shitty little soul that you're right.
They are just like every other Internet wanna be that will never be.
They don't wanna show any fairness. They just wanna be right. That it's an automatic downvote without even reading it.
That's how pathetic this board is.
They hate with every fiber in their shitty little soul that you're right.
They are just like every other Internet wanna be that will never be.
They don't wanna show any fairness. They just wanna be right. That it's an automatic downvote without even reading it.
That's how pathetic this board is.
This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 3:39 pm

Popular
Back to top


0









