| Favorite team: | USA |
| Location: | St. George |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 56709 |
| Registered on: | 10/30/2007 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote::rotflmao:
and her 7-year-old son has severe allergies
WTF? Allergies are a disability now? These people.
quote:
a certified lactation counselor
Not a real job
quote:
childbirth educator
Not a real job
quote:
doula
quote:
A doula is a non-medical professional who provides guidance for the service of others and who supports another person through a significant health-related experience, such as childbirth, miscarriage, induced abortion or stillbirth, as well as non-reproductive experiences such as dying
not a real job
quote:
parent advocate for No Kid Hungry.
Not a real job
quote:
She went back to school when her twins were less than two years old
That's awfully irresponsible since she already admitted her husband was an idiot...i mean "disabled".
quote:
graduated Summa Cum Laude with a Bachelor’s in Marketing and Entrepreneurship!
All of that, and she doesn't hold 1 real job.
Come on lefties/white women. Defend her. I dare you.
I find the silence on this board from the "muh Epstein files" types to be deafening, considering they started no less than 20 threads/day on the subject matter.
I also find it ironic that their impatience only really started when the left started crying about it. WHich just so happened to coincide with good news from the White House on trade deals, peace treaties, and the economy. Strange...
I also find it ironic that their impatience only really started when the left started crying about it. WHich just so happened to coincide with good news from the White House on trade deals, peace treaties, and the economy. Strange...
re: Massie on the Epstein victims: “It’s not their job to release the (perp) names.”
Posted by BugAC on 11/18/25 at 12:40 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
But the Epstein conduct at issue happened between 15 and 25 years ago. The witnesses and victims are almost all still alive. Most of the perpetrators are all alive. Why would we be focused on "files" when those files wouldn't even be admissible into evidence without the testimony of the living victims?
Imagine, outside of the Epstein context, that a woman was accusing some unnamed third party of raping her, while steadfastly refusing to identify rapist, and then expecting the government to do something about it. What?
I tried to tell them, but the "muh epstein files" psychos wouldn't listen.
re: Well here is the "no spit Sherlock" statement of the day, week and year.
Posted by BugAC on 11/18/25 at 12:38 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
No one wants to do that for $16 an hour
I don't know any welders that make $16/hour. They make much more.
quote:
Navy secretary says it's hard to get workers to want to build warships if they get paid what they might make at Buc-ee's or Amazon
Doubt this is accurate. How much does an amazon worker or buccee's employee make. I'm talking labor, not management.
re: President autopen
Posted by BugAC on 11/18/25 at 12:33 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
It is a silly and unnecessary degradation of the sanctity of the WH -
Moreso than having staffers use an autopen to sign things and pass it off as official POTUS record?
re: Zeharan Mamdani Reaffirmed, he will arrest the PM of Israel Netanyahu- if he visits NY
Posted by BugAC on 11/18/25 at 12:25 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
I've been in the threads on here that label anything less than 100% Pro Israel First to be antisemetic, anti-Israel, Jew hater, etc...
This is a lie. I'm not 100% Israel first and ive never been called those things. You are being dramatic because a post didn't go your way in the past.
re: Trump has it right on the economy. Tariff-hating "conservatives" are clueless
Posted by BugAC on 11/18/25 at 10:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Haven't really read this particular thread, but i have a question for you. And i've asked this in previous threads.
How do you force a bad actor, in this case another country, to trade fairly with the US, on equal terms? We can reasonable assume country A is trading US goods but applies their own tariffs, VATs, or other tax measures to artificially inflate the price of US goods so as to give a competitive advantage to their countries own goods. Let's assume the US, is not doing this in near the amount that Country A is doing this.
A) How do you get Country A to stop penalizing American products unfairly if not through tariffs?
Part 2, it has been stated by Scott Bessent that tariffs don't necessarily make the price of goods rise. The reasoning behind this, is America is the largest market in the world. Meaning, we buy everyone's shite. If a tariff is applied to a foreign good, that foreign company could just pass it on to the consumer. But what happens to that good? Price rises. In a competitive market, when prices rise, what does the consumer do? Buys from another seller. Ergo, it is within a companies best interest, if the intent is to keep trade in the largest market in the world, to eat that tariff cost, as much as it is feasible so that company remains competitive. Do you disagree with this?
re: What, specifically, did Trump see Epstein do that made him tell Epstein to stop?
Posted by BugAC on 11/18/25 at 8:25 am to theunknownknight
quote:
I truly don’t understand the cultish behavior here.
Me neither. I don't understand why you'd pose such a silly demand knowing how cultish it sounds. Your cult is "never Trump'. It's apparent by your asinine question. Let's dissect your OP and i'll show you.
quote:
People applaud Trump for standing up to Epstein, but I have yet hear anyone ask Trump that follow-up question.
The "applause" is mostly due to media and TDS nerds who have told everyone that Trump is "on the list" and a "pedophile". Not to mention, Trump has been attacked literally more than any politician in the history of this country. But, despite knowing all of those attacks were bullshite, you trot this little retarded statement, why? Because your intent it to cast doubt, when no one is really doubting this and it's been widely reported and broadcasted for years.
quote:
Trump admitted he knew Epstein was up to no good, his own words. This was also confirmed in the released emails.
Correct, so then why do you doubt this?
quote:
So is anyone going to ask him, straight up, what specifically triggered his conscience?
Why does someone have to ask him, if you already admitted that evidence has cleared him? Unless, you just won't be happy unless you finally "GET TRUMP" regardless of how much bullshite you are spreading.
I'm open to legit criticism of Trump and will happily debate you. But what you are trying here right now is just pathetic. Don't get mad and call everyone a cult because YOU started a stupid thread.
re: What, specifically, did Trump see Epstein do that made him tell Epstein to stop?
Posted by BugAC on 11/18/25 at 8:16 am to theunknownknight
quote:
I just think it is odd no one has had this common sense thought. Only a sycophant wouldn't want to know the truth here.
Right. I'm sure this has nothing to do with you types demanding "epstein files now!" and now that permission is granted, and Trump is cleared, you are now making demands for other piddly shite to just find something that would make "orange man really bad" in your eyes...right?
re: Candace says what she reveals today “will change everything” “nothing will be the same”
Posted by BugAC on 11/18/25 at 8:12 am to _Hurricane_
quote:
Candace says what she reveals today “will change everything” “nothing will be the same”

re: What, specifically, did Trump see Epstein do that made him tell Epstein to stop?
Posted by BugAC on 11/18/25 at 8:11 am to theunknownknight
quote:
So is anyone going to ask him, straight up, what specifically triggered his conscience?
If he answers, will you hate him less?
re: Politico: “How Thomas Massie outmaneuvered Trump on Epstein”
Posted by BugAC on 11/17/25 at 10:50 pm to Sassafrasology
Politico….lol
re: "Big Beautiful Bill" Disaster for America. GOP has failed us. (Redacted & Massie explain)
Posted by BugAC on 11/17/25 at 3:33 pm to EphesianArmor
In reality, can Republicans ever get spending cuts passed? I'm talking impactful cuts that will actually reduce the national debt long term?
At this point, i don't think they can anymore. The takers have exceeded the providers. So any cuts to welfare, corruptions, or waste is used to beat teh Republicans in the next election and sadly, it works.
So if you can't realistically cut our way out of it, how do you reduce the debt? You'll have to increase GDP.
I don't know if the BBB is going to drastically increase GDP. And maybe we can make legitimate cuts. But it doesn't seem like any cuts we make does anything than put the democrats in power.
Listening to Elon on Rogan the other night. It seems hopeless and as he stated it, the debt issue can not be solved in Washington. So the only way to solve the debt issue is by increasing GDP drastically, which he says, the way to do this is through AI.
ETA: i'm not defending the current spending, just asking a legit question. Massie can't get support for anything he wants to do so he can say what he wants without any repurcussions and just a lot of "i told ya so's".
At this point, i don't think they can anymore. The takers have exceeded the providers. So any cuts to welfare, corruptions, or waste is used to beat teh Republicans in the next election and sadly, it works.
So if you can't realistically cut our way out of it, how do you reduce the debt? You'll have to increase GDP.
I don't know if the BBB is going to drastically increase GDP. And maybe we can make legitimate cuts. But it doesn't seem like any cuts we make does anything than put the democrats in power.
Listening to Elon on Rogan the other night. It seems hopeless and as he stated it, the debt issue can not be solved in Washington. So the only way to solve the debt issue is by increasing GDP drastically, which he says, the way to do this is through AI.
ETA: i'm not defending the current spending, just asking a legit question. Massie can't get support for anything he wants to do so he can say what he wants without any repurcussions and just a lot of "i told ya so's".
re: Trump: Free Tina Peters - or else
Posted by BugAC on 11/17/25 at 1:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is dumb even for MAGA content creators.
Explain "what" is dumb. It's likely your understanding of what is going on, but i want your take.
I mean, to be fair to Nancy, she did just spend all that money putting 200+ FBI agents into the crowd to whip up a frenzy. Would have been wasteful to just undo that with the National Guard.
quote:
Collin Rugg of Trending Politics noted Friday that “psychotherapist Jonathan Alpert says that 75% of the patients he sees have a deep hatred for Trump and are ‘hyper fixated’ on him.”
This isn't limited to leftists. We have some resident TDS afflicted folks on this board.
quote:
Now what?

re: Thrive, And The EBR Library System
Posted by BugAC on 11/17/25 at 8:11 am to nola tiger lsu
quote:
You are voting to have no services, congrats. Taxes fund basic city services. This is civilization 101.
So voting no on additional taxes is voting no on services? You are aware we can read right? You do know we know we are already the highest taxed state per capita outside California, right?
quote:
You have no idea on the services they provide, who uses them, and their value to the community.
And you have not clue of the tax revenue already collected by the city/state and the absurdity of asking for more, when there is obvious bloat and waste.
quote:
Make the drugs there illegal again, still going to be the same shite holes.
Drug zombie cities didn’t exist when drugs were illegal. Sorry your fent pushers are getting what they deserve.
Popular
0












