Started By
Message

re: Brian Billick: There's an overwhelming chance Cam Newton fails in the NFL

Posted on 4/22/11 at 7:50 am to
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 7:50 am to
Cam is going to be the second coming of Jamarcus Russell
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38475 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 7:52 am to
quote:

Cam is going to be the second coming of Jamarcus Russell


Well there's a new take on Cam nobody has ever heard before.
Posted by JasonMason
Memphis
Member since Jun 2009
4857 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 7:59 am to
quote:

uabtodd


quote:

10% of 280 < a couple dozen?

never knew a former football coaches dozen=15



This is the part of the article you're going to pick apart??
Posted by Jaydeaux
Covington
Member since May 2005
19244 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 8:02 am to
quote:

Cam is going to be the second coming of Jamarcus Russell


I doubt this but to get any of these aubbies to see that Cam is fake as they come (fake nice, fake genuine etc) is not going to happen. If Vegas had a line on this the odds would favor fail and for some of the reasons Billick says. Billick now makes a living doing this so I don't know why he would be so extreme if there wasn't some type of consensus out there regarding part of his opinion

Continue circling the wagons barners
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57004 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 8:07 am to
quote:

"36".....simple.






Cant wait to see him audible


quote:

“I think his eagerness to learn and prove that he can adapt to a pro style on offense. He showed very good retention to me in the meetings and the material that we covered.


quote:

Yeah, it’s not his fault that they don’t huddle. This is a no-huddle offense,” Gruden said. “Cam Newton will learn quickly what to call formations, what to call shifts, what to call motions. That is something that I learned. What he’s got to get ready for right away is learning the terminology and how to spit these plays out clearly, quickly, and get the team up to the line of scrimmage where he has time to deal.”


What Sam Bradford said last year was just a number and a word, so not that much more. and no I am not comparing bradford and newton, just the style of offense
This post was edited on 4/22/11 at 9:30 am
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
31192 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 8:47 am to
Cam has proven he has the ability to adapt. He had what, three offensive systems to learn in three years with three different coaches?

He has personality & character issues that rub some folks the wrong way - but he's a good athlete that's smart and can learn what he needs to learn to be successful. It's been said before that Cecil has been the driving force behind Cam his whole life - I don't think Cecil will let him just give up and ruin his career now that they've made it to the Big Time.

Just my $.02 -
This post was edited on 4/22/11 at 8:48 am
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:26 am to
I look for Cam to struggle in the nfl, I may be wrong, in fact I hope I am, but the shiny stuff will only get you so far, there has to be some substance.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54694 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:30 am to
I haven't read anything in this thread but the title, so sorry if my comment is off topic.

I think Cam will struggle if he has to be the starter on day 1. If he is given time to develop and has to fight for his playing time, he has a chance to be successful. I think his drive to succeed will help him put in the work and time necessary for him to succeed. However, if he is the de facto starter from day 1, he may or may not do the hard work he needs to do.
Posted by rangers911
Member since Jun 2009
5159 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:43 am to
quote:

10% of 280 < a couple dozen?

never knew a former football coaches dozen=15


Making his blanket statement like that it is obvious he hasn't watched much film or doesn't know what he's talking about from a throwing standpoint.

His concerns with all of the other stuff are valid, I disagree with him but you can raise questions about things surrounding Cam. That said some teams have liked the way Newton handled himself and won with everything going on around him.

Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
20469 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:47 am to
quote:

but he's a good athlete that's smart and can learn what he needs to learn to be successful


That describes Leaf, Vince Young, JaMarcus, and Michael Vick (prior to his prison sentence), talented athletes who haven't done or didn't do the work needed to maximize their abilities. And is the exact opposite of Tim Tebow, who may or may not be super-talented but will bust his arse to make the most of what he does have.
Posted by GarmischTiger
Humboldt County
Member since Mar 2007
6760 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:51 am to
quote:

quote:

but he's a good athlete that's smart and can learn what he needs to learn to be successful


That describes Leaf, Vince Young, JaMarcus, and Michael Vick (prior to his prison sentence), talented athletes who haven't done or didn't do the work needed to maximize their abilities. And is the exact opposite of Tim Tebow, who may or may not be super-talented but will bust his arse to make the most of what he does have.


disqualifies Jamarcus.
Posted by BrooksnDunn
Daphne, AL
Member since Nov 2009
755 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:58 am to
I would venture to say that there is an overwhelming chance that any Rookie fails in the NFL.
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
20469 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:58 am to
quote:

disqualifies Jamarcus


Its hard to be a starting QB at an elite-level program without having some working neurons that can understand football Xs and Os.

The trap is that many athletes (not just football) think talent is all that is needed to be successful at the next level (HS to College, College to Pros), only to find that everyone else is just as good if not better, or at least is willing to bust theirs to beat yours.
Posted by fb2000
Member since Apr 2011
15 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 10:02 am to
quote:

Cant wait to see him audible


Oklahoma uses the same type of offensive system that Auburn uses, and it didn't take Sam Bradford long at all to adapt.

And many NFL QBs don't audible. Here's what NFL OC Cam Cameron said last year: "Audibling is overrated. It really is. I mean, it's good to talk about, and I could sit here and let you guys think we do all this audibling and how clever we are and how tricky we are and all that stuff."

My personal opinion is that Cam Newton won't succeed because he doesn't throw accurately enough. Frankly, I don't expect any of the top QBs this year (Newton, Gabbert, Locker, Mallet) to have success in the NFL. Just my opinion.
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
34658 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Oklahoma uses the same type of offensive system that Auburn uses, and it didn't take Sam Bradford long at all to adapt.

And many NFL QBs don't audible. Here's what NFL OC Cam Cameron said last year: "Audibling is overrated. It really is. I mean, it's good to talk about, and I could sit here and let you guys think we do all this audibling and how clever we are and how tricky we are and all that stuff."

My personal opinion is that Cam Newton won't succeed because he doesn't throw accurately enough. Frankly, I don't expect any of the top QBs this year (Newton, Gabbert, Locker, Mallet) to have success in the NFL. Just my opinion.



If you go to the MSB, I have a topic going about a website that crunched all the numbers about QBs from this year's draft and saw only one QB with the potential to be a franchise QB. That QB is Ricky Stanzi and his numbers last season were eerily similar to Tom Brady's senior season at Michigan. They were virtually identical.
Posted by Marty McFrat
Arkansas hell
Member since Feb 2011
14827 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 10:11 am to
So let me get this straight aubbie's. We bash gruden for being a former head coach because him not being able to coach QB's and you all would come back with he has a Superbowl ring as a head coach so he must know his stuff.

Now, a former coach is bashing cam and you're saying that's he is a former coach because he doesn't know anything about QB's. But this guy has a SB ring as well. So which is it? Is Gruden wrong or Billick right?
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57004 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 10:19 am to
quote:

So which is it? Is Gruden wrong or Billick right?


Umm, your question is wrong. it is not one or the other
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
37521 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 10:22 am to
Well considering the overwhelming majority of players fail in the NFL........I'd say Billick is really going out on a limb for this one

Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
79487 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Are you saying Dilfer led the Ravens to the Superbowl?
Dilfer was their Matt Flynn.

Just don't lose it for us, bruh.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57004 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Well considering the overwhelming majority of players fail in the NFL........I'd say Billick is really going out on a limb for this one


This^^^, and the stat for QB's is even higher. Considering you only have one starter or guy that plays the entire game, as compared to every other position
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter