Started By
Message
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:54 pm to lsufball19
quote:
lsufball19
Appreciate you providing your thoughts
Personally, I find all of this fascinating
Regardless of how it ultimately plays out, it has been extremely interesting and will make for a fun hypothetical on future law school exams
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:54 pm to Tenn grad LSU fan
quote:
Yeah Louisiana is the kind of state that would rather be good in football a poor in state
Better than Mississippi being a poor state with below average football.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:57 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
quote:
Personally, I find all of this fascinating
Oh as a lawyer I find it very fascinating. A lot of it is outside my practice area but it’s definitely interesting to follow. I just wish it didn’t involve my school
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:58 pm to TigerLunatik
Your shite’s going to get vacated anyways and now you won’t get your typical favorable treatment by the refs. Knowing you worthless Cajuns you’ll probably try to sue to overturn every loss you take though
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:59 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
The exact type of shite that brings a locker room together more than anything dumass.
Until Dottery starts taking dick picks of your linemen and selling them on OF.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:01 pm to TigerLunatik
The SEC filed it's suit in Federal court in Northern Alabama.
This podunk judge means nothing.
This podunk judge means nothing.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:01 pm to Henry Jones Jr
As I see it, the Federal lawsuit's allegations are completely different from the allegations in the State suit. The Feds are alleging that LSU/Kiffen /, LSU BOS, etc conspired to induce college players to join the lawsuit. Though I admit I have not read the entire Federal suit.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:03 pm to ThePoo
quote:
The irony that it is in Alabama, the state of the first university in the SEC to play a pro player in college A pro player that had eligibility left and was a pro for multiple years
Where it was overturned and he had to stop playing?
It was also a local rather than federal court and was filed on different grounds than the federal case.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:04 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
It means they are able to suspend Kiffin and fine LSU and you retards will be able to do nothing but wait for the outcome of the federal case. Your athletic program goes bankrupt in that scenario. I want you to play these players. Go full retard

Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:05 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
It means they are able to suspend Kiffin and fine LSU and you retards will be able to do nothing but wait for the outcome of the federal case.
Your athletic program goes bankrupt in that scenario. I want you to play these players. Go full retard.
Well you havent been right about a single thing the last 10 months. So, this eases my mind.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:06 pm to SOBmustpay
Federal Court > LSU Judge
I expect federal Court to make a ruling quickly. It would be bold to play the guys this weekend.
I expect federal Court to make a ruling quickly. It would be bold to play the guys this weekend.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:07 pm to TigerLunatik
Great roster them tomorrow . Please!
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:08 pm to TigerLunatik
In the end sec will win in federal court that all members must comply with bylaws of conference. Precedent set in Big 12 ruling. Federal courts override state court decision and SEC will have grounds to penalize LSU for not following those rules. In the end that’s what will happen.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:09 pm to TigerLunatik
Clemson has the opportunity to do the funniest thing ever.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 9:11 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:11 pm to AggieBoy86
quote:Exactly.
In the end sec will win in federal court that all members must comply with bylaws of conference. Precedent set in Big 12 ruling. Federal courts override state court decision and SEC will have grounds to penalize LSU for not following those rules. In the end that’s what will happen.
It’s insane to me that they’re continuing to push this when this is the end game and has been since the Sorseby case was done earlier this year
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:13 pm to Coldcushcush
quote:
how many times do you have to be informed that LSU was NOT part of this court action It was not a suit. also, this judge is unopposed in the next election. please quit repeating these falsehoods; you can't be that stupid.
LOL.

Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:13 pm to BobLeeDagger
All this means is if they (LSU) plays those guys, it's going to get ugly.
Popular
Back to top


0











