Started By
Message

re: Bama is getting screwed

Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:07 pm to
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
10783 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

They did last year when they put SMU in over Alabama.


SMU had 11 wins and 2 losses

Alabama had 9 wins and 3 losses two of which were to 6-6 teams one in a blowout loss (Oklahoma)

So, SMU had two more wins and 1 fewer loss. That is why they made it over Alabama. This isn't hard to understand. You have to beat the teams on your schedule. Alabama did not.
Posted by Chip82
Athens, Georgia
Member since Jan 2023
1621 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

It’s something he should not have released, but it’s pretty much been agreed on by all the conferences.


This simply isn't true.

Sankey has recently started to lobby for it after he came to the realization that he couldn't make excuses that would hold water for the 9 game schedule.

All you have to do is look at the weekly Vegas Odds between conference opponents in the SEC versus conference opponents in the B1G and others.

Georgia's largest point spread this year was Kentucky at 21 points.

But Kirby Smart will repeatedly tell you that the Kentucky game has consistently been one of more physical opponents that Georgia plays.

Now compare that to Ohio State.

Ohio State will play Rutgers this week with a 33 point spread.
Remember, this is an in-conference game.
And it is one of several in-conference games where Ohio State has enjoyed a point spread of more than 21 points.

The SEC will now have an additional weekend of ELIMINATION games.



Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
91883 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

All SEC fans not pulling for Bama will argue until the end that Bama is not being under-ranked by the committee, in fact they are being treated better than they should.



Seems like most of us think you should be in so not sure what you're going on about.
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
9468 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

quote:They are holding them back because of a road first game loss. They got blown out by an ACC bottom feeder, that game should matter.


So a win against #4 on the road cant offset that. What about Notre Dame losing to Northern Illinois last season...should they have not gotten in?

I know everyone is jazzed that Alabama is the one getting the shaft...but what happens when its YOUR team. The committee is essentially saying that strength of schedule doesnt matter much so when your team ultimately gets that extra loss because they are getting beat down by 9 SEC games while ND, SMU, Oregon, etc avoid losses by just playing shite teams outrank them...dont then change your tune
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
9468 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

quote:They did last year when they put SMU in over Alabama. SMU had 11 wins and 2 losses Alabama had 9 wins and 3 losses two of which were to 6-6 teams one in a blowout loss (Oklahoma) So, SMU had two more wins and 1 fewer loss. That is why they made it over Alabama. This isn't hard to understand. You have to beat the teams on your schedule. Alabama did not.


Thats fine...just put the easiest teams you possibly can in front of you if thats the criteria. Instead of FSU on the road, we schedule Little Sisters of the Poor. Sure the team may have a bad game but at least you wont lose.

Also lets drop the insanity of 9 SEC games if winning tough games cannot offset losses
Posted by NWLA_Bama
Member since Aug 2024
1223 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:25 pm to
So one game on opening weekend should carry more weight than four wins against ranked teams with one being against a top five team? The only world where that makes sense is someone who is already biased against Alabama.
Posted by TS1926
Alabama
Member since Jan 2020
7388 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

They got blown out by an ACC bottom feeder, that game should matter.


I can expect a stupid post from Dr Stupid.
It’s highly possible FSU will wind up 7-5.
Pitt- with GTech and Miami left on their schedule could also end up 7-5.
Wanna know Notre Dame’s second best win?
You’re right if you guessed Pitt.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
38927 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:27 pm to
As much as I hate the term "eye-test" because it was invented by ESPN for Alabama to justify a rematch with LSU....

"This is an Eye-Test Committee and not a Resume Committee"

And Notre Dame passes the eye-test compared to Alabama.

Funny how Bama is now getting burned by what they once lobbied and profited from.
Posted by Imber
Member since Sep 2017
17271 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Bama is getting screwed


Posted by bigDgator
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2008
48121 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Bama is getting screwed

They are holding them back because of a road first game loss.


Well we were told ad nauseum by Bama fans that expanding the playoff would make the regular season not matter.

Nothing against Bama, I love all my Bama peeps on here, but they were very loud about their hatred for the playoff expansion in that it would relegate the regular season to games no one cared about.

So I am pretty sure Bama fans will not agree with you on this thread.

Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69189 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

And Notre Dame passes the eye-test compared to Alabama.



Probably because Notre Dame's SOS is significantly inferior to Alabama's. The Tide are playing Top 25 teams week in and week out whereas Notre Dame's best win is #16 USC. Their second best win was to an unranked Pittsburgh team that could potentially finish with the same record as Florida State - Alabama's worst loss.
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 12:35 pm
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105480 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

"This is an Eye-Test Committee and not a Resume Committee"

And Notre Dame passes the eye-test compared to Alabama.



How can you even do an eye test? Alabama has played, in the last 8 weeks, #4 Georgia, #14 Vanderbilt, #22 Missouri, #20 Tennessee, South Carolina, LSU and #8 Oklahoma.

Notre Dame has played Purdue, Arkansas, Boise State, NC State, #15 USC, Boston College, Navy and Pitt.

Purdue is going to finish 2-10 (0-9 B1G)

Arkansas is going to finish 2-10 (0-8 SEC)

Boise State is going to finish 8-4 in the Mtn West

NC State is going to finish 6-6/7-5

Boston College is going to finish 2-10/1-11 (0-8 ACC)

Navy is going to finish 9-3 with 1 win over a Top 75 team

Pitt is going to finish 8-4/7-5



I mean come on. 3 of their wins since starting 0-2 are literally against teams that are going to go 0 for their conference. Another is against an 8-4 MWC team.
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 12:35 pm
Posted by Gideon Swashbuckler
Member since Sep 2019
8544 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

The bottom line the sec is fricked going to 9 games .

The system was designed by the BigX because they have more garbage teams. Idk why they don't go to a 10-game conference schedule, and my guess is they will in lieu of a BigX championship game (especially if OhioSt loses this season) and to coax the SEC to do the same. Only OhioSt will get to drop Texas and pencil in Maryland or Rutgers. Aggie will have to drop ND and play Ole Miss Or BAMA or the could luck up and get UK.
What happens for BigX teams every year can happen in the SEC but it's by chance.

Look at Aggie's conference schedule. They dodged every contender except Tejas. Now, it doesn't get much easier in the SEC than:

Barn
MissSt
UF
Arky
LLLSU
Mizzou
USC
Tejas
This isnt exactly murderers' row. But it is noteworthy that all of those teams have played in the SECCG and Aggie went 8-4 vs basically the same schedule last year. The parity that exists in the SEC made Aggie's schedule easy. Everyone thought before the season LLLsu was a playoff team. Texas too.

Compare that to OhioSt:
Wash
Minn
Illinois
Wisc
PSU
Purdue
Ucla
Rutgers
Mich

Minn has 2 ten win seasons in history and will never play for a championship.
Illinois has three and will never play for a champ.
Purdue has one but one of those wins was vacated so they never have officially won 10 games in a season. They will never play for a champ.
Ucla has 3 ten win seasons since 1998. They will never play for a championship again.
Rutgers has 1. Never will play for a championship.

Add Maryland, Nebraska, Northwestern, and until last year Indiana who will revert hard when Cignetti's gone. Anybody see Wisc or USC, or Iowa, returning to glory any time soon and playing in the BigXCG? The travel will always make it difficult for the west coast teams. The east coast teams (OhioSt mainly) will never have to play anything but 330 games on the West coast. Imagine OhioSt playing a night game in the Coliseum and then playing a BIG NOON KICKOFF the next week. It will NEVER happen. They'll also never be any BIG NOON KICKOFFS with OhioSt out west either. They will always get the benefit of the schedule and its simple.

Since 2000, OhioSt is 225-50 on the field including post season.
They are 69-26 in night games.

Over half their losses have been at night. That's why you don't see OhioSt play at night. The conference knows this. Why make your bell cow play night games they are twice as likely to lose no matter the record of the other team?

In night games vs teams that ended the season with 10+ wins, OhioSt is 20-17.

CUM was 9-5 in night games vs teams that finished the season with 10+ wins.
Without him, OhioSt for as dominant as they have been is 11-17 vs 10+win teams at night since 2000.





This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 12:49 pm
Posted by BZ504
Texas
Member since Oct 2005
12577 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Bama is getting screwed


This would be the first time in history that Bama got screwed.
Posted by Gideon Swashbuckler
Member since Sep 2019
8544 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

This would be the first time in history that Bama got screwed.


BAMA was 12-0 going into the SECCG. They lost by 1. Win that game and win the sugar and 14-0 BAMA splits the national title with 13-0 Nebraska.

We got screwed by having to play a conference championship game while Nebraska sat at home.
Posted by cmayes56
Alabama
Member since Oct 2015
3069 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:48 pm to
Great point.. the committee has backed themselves in a corner putting Alabama 10th.

What happens if (unlikely) Georgia Tech beats Georgia to close the season.

Does Georgia fall below Alabama? Remember the head to head element.

What if Ole Miss loses to State? That’s a rivalry game, crazier things have happened… is Ole Miss suddenly on the outside looking in while teams like Oregon, Notre Dame etc get in having beaten no one with a pulse.

Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105480 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

What if Ole Miss loses to State? That’s a rivalry game, crazier things have happened… is Ole Miss suddenly on the outside looking in while teams like Oregon, Notre Dame etc get in having beaten no one with a pulse.


If Ole Miss loses to State they are going to be out. The one win @ Oklahoma isn't going to be enough in a crowded group of 10-2 teams.
Posted by theballguy
Bama Park
Member since Oct 2011
28008 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:50 pm to
The only thing that matters is beating Auburn otherwise season is over and no, Alabama does not deserve the playoffs with 3 losses.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
31639 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

You really trying to get us to feel bad for BAMA? I hope they suffer every misfortune possible for the next 20 years.
That's the spirit!

Posted by cmayes56
Alabama
Member since Oct 2015
3069 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:57 pm to
What happens to Georgia?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter