Started By
Message

re: Any Ideas on what happens to the Big12 and PacW?

Posted on 2/13/23 at 6:05 pm to
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30642 posts
Posted on 2/13/23 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

What do you define as "bad programs?"


Programs that carry so little weight, regardless of accomplishments that they are only invited to a conference with one foot in the grave.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30642 posts
Posted on 2/13/23 at 7:10 pm to
Are conference championships even worth playing in a 12 team playoff?
Posted by Radio Zero
I grew up on FIFTH AVENUE.
Member since Nov 2022
1168 posts
Posted on 2/13/23 at 7:11 pm to
worth in what sense. because if it makes a profit theyre prob not going anywhere dont you think.
Posted by MillerLiteTime
Atlanta
Member since Aug 2018
2564 posts
Posted on 2/13/23 at 8:19 pm to
I know this is an unpopular opinion, but the Pac is still a far superior conference to the Big 12. The Big 12 just happens to be the flavor of the month because they surprisingly survived when everyone thought they were dead. To me, a power conference should dominate its region. The entire Big 12, other than in Kansas, is nothing but 2nd or 3rd tier programs within each state who don’t dominate any media market. The Pac at least still has flagship programs like Washington, Oregon, Cal, Arizona, Utah, and Colorado. It makes more sense for those programs to absorb a few Big 12 schools. The Big 12 has no backbone programs to hold it together long term. Its just a mid major conference with a power 5 name.
Posted by Radio Zero
I grew up on FIFTH AVENUE.
Member since Nov 2022
1168 posts
Posted on 2/13/23 at 8:26 pm to
Pac has no future because nobody cares out west, even tho they always try to make it a excuse about attendance at USC UCLA games because its hot in Los Angeles lol but those photos dont lie ppl dont care

it doesnt matter how big the market is if they dont care you could put a NFL team in Berlin nobody gives a shite nobody gives a shite abt football outside america .

now I not saying the b12 is a power conference but at least ppl in Nebraska and Missouri are Interested in college sports esp. football
This post was edited on 2/14/23 at 5:01 am
Posted by Radio Zero
I grew up on FIFTH AVENUE.
Member since Nov 2022
1168 posts
Posted on 2/13/23 at 8:26 pm to
Berlin Germany is what I meant
Posted by everytrueson
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Mar 2012
5923 posts
Posted on 2/13/23 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

I know this is an unpopular opinion, but the Pac is still a far superior conference to the Big 12. The Big 12 just happens to be the flavor of the month because they surprisingly survived when everyone thought they were dead. To me, a power conference should dominate its region. The entire Big 12, other than in Kansas, is nothing but 2nd or 3rd tier programs within each state who don’t dominate any media market. The Pac at least still has flagship programs like Washington, Oregon, Cal, Arizona, Utah, and Colorado. It makes more sense for those programs to absorb a few Big 12 schools. The Big 12 has no backbone programs to hold it together long term. Its just a mid major conference with a power 5 name.


I agree with you on paper. But the TV deals are running the show. Big12 has found a way to land that money. PAC has not.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30642 posts
Posted on 2/14/23 at 7:07 am to
I don’t know if it’s popular to say. But we need to have 4 16-team leagues if we cannot close Pandora’s box.


The big12 and pacw should have gotten along in their negotiations and merged their top 16 teams.


Now we are stuck with watching the big12 have games like:

Baylor v UCF
OkState v Cincinatti

Instead of
Baylor vs Oregon
OkState vs Washington.

They actually would have been a pretty good league to merge the tow power fives.

Now we will see Fresno state and unlv get added to the pac.

Posted by ScoggDog
SE Indiana
Member since Aug 2020
3623 posts
Posted on 2/14/23 at 9:19 am to
I don’t know if it’s popular to say. But we need to have 4 16-team leagues if we cannot close Pandora’s box. The big12 and pacw should have gotten along in their negotiations and merged their top 16 teams.

I think you're right. A merged league with Texas, Oklahoma, USC, and UCLA would have been able to get a really, really nice TV deal. I don't see how the Big12 is going to get along with WVU, Cincy, and such.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30642 posts
Posted on 2/14/23 at 11:11 am to
Yep.

Wvu and ND need to go ACC.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46611 posts
Posted on 2/14/23 at 11:30 am to
[quote]I am wondering about Kansas. They are AAU and maybe they are in the plans for either the Big10 or SEC next round? They are dumping money into modernizing their football stadium. If they stabilize as a .500 football team - they already make decent money off of basketball- would this make them attractive enough to the SEC?
[/quote]

You're wondering about the JayTwats? SEC doesn't need and probably doesn't want KU and many Mizzou fans are happy the contentious and nasty tradition with Kpuke is dead.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30642 posts
Posted on 2/14/23 at 12:14 pm to
I would assume, since, he brought up AAU that he means the big10 for Kansas.



I will say this about athletic conferences and their gravitation to the AAU:

It means absolutely nothing to me.
For a moment, imagine that Uga and Georgia Tech were Indy and the big10 is looking for two schools to add.

Can’t tell me for a moment that they would take GT and not Uga due to affiliation to the AAU.


*the AAU is an amazing club to belong to, btw. But it does want mean a thing to tv revenue.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
55167 posts
Posted on 2/14/23 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

It means absolutely nothing to me.


That is because you are not a college president

quote:

Can’t tell me for a moment that they would take GT and not Uga due to affiliation to the AAU.


This is probably true. Just weird they voted Nebraska out out of the AAU (B1G schools casting the deciding votes to expel) after they vote Nebraska in to the B1G



quote:

*the AAU is an amazing club to belong to, btw. But it does want mean a thing to tv revenue.


It has always been anti South from the start. Tulane, GT, UNC, and Duke were later. UGA is better than several actual AAU schools but GT was the "research" of the two.

You are right that it does not do much for TV revenue but college sports are really glorified infomercials to get kids to go there. What you are missing is the real money maker at universities (at least since the 80's).

Look at the recent B1G additions

Rutgers - sure B1G gets to claim they invented football but what they really got was a research school

Maryland - not exactly a football powerhouse but historically solid basketball and a research school

Johns Hopkins - in 2021 did a whopping ~3.2 BILLION in research. How many sports programs combined would it take to do 3.2 Billion a year? Michigan does about half of that at 1.6 Billion


The last things colleges care about these days is actually educating kids. Entertainment (via say sports) is somewhere in the middle. Top priority for college presidents and their boards is locking down research grants and spending the money.
Posted by surgicalvenom
Omaha
Member since Jan 2014
5380 posts
Posted on 2/14/23 at 12:40 pm to
The SEC and Big 10 work together to break away from the NCAA. Next they get 6 teams from the ACC to pledge to join plus ND to destabilize the ACC and offer ESPN first broadcast rights to compensate.

Now the Big/SEC controls 95% of the major broadcast market killing revenues for everyone else while raking in about 400 Million per member school. (ND covers the Chicago market)

NIL money is equal among member schools as now national brands like Lexus, MB and Apple sign on and the money gets ridiculous. FB and BB is assigned 1 million per scholarship player all other sports $200k to $500k.

IMHO
This post was edited on 2/14/23 at 1:34 pm
Posted by Bwmdx
Member since Dec 2018
2792 posts
Posted on 2/14/23 at 1:32 pm to
I agree. The Big 12 has only 2 teams that are the most popular in their state, WVU and Kansas. That is not something to hang your hat on.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30642 posts
Posted on 2/14/23 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

I agree. The Big 12 has only 2 teams that are the most popular in their state, WVU and Kansas. That is not something to hang your hat on.


But for the state of Texas there have been numerous players and what might make these schools interesting

Tcu
Baylor
Ttu May get a surge one day.
Ok State has definitely gotten some good seasons.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30642 posts
Posted on 2/14/23 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

That is because you are not a college president


Uhhh. So is about 99% percent of all Saturday college football watchers
Posted by MOJO_ERASER
Tulsa Oklahoma
Member since Jun 2017
5839 posts
Posted on 2/14/23 at 7:29 pm to
big 12 aleady picked up 4 schools... anything else now its just gravy they are still easily the 3rd best conference.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
55167 posts
Posted on 2/14/23 at 7:40 pm to
Not disagreeing just saying 3.2 Billion a year coming in makes a college president happy than winning a natty.

Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30642 posts
Posted on 2/15/23 at 5:25 am to
quote:

big 12 aleady picked up 4 schools... anything else now its just gravy they are still easily the 3rd best conference.


Maybe. But I always think of the “gravy” analogy where you’ve done what you need tk do and everything after that is “gravy”.

Adding go5 programs is not “doing what you need to do”.

UCF lol
Houston lol
BYU. Lol
Cin. Meh.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter