Favorite team:Missouri 
Location:Omaha
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:Sales
Number of Posts:6632
Registered on:1/26/2014
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: 2026 Portal Tracker

Posted by surgicalvenom on 12/31/25 at 9:36 pm to
Johnson couldn't have thought he was going to put up big numbers in 2025 with the starters we had. The real battle doesn't begin until 2026, when we potentially replace both starters.

re: 2026 Portal Tracker

Posted by surgicalvenom on 12/31/25 at 5:44 pm to
Why the hell is Nate Johnson leaving?
The kid is a true freshman. Zollars didn't look good either, most freshman dont.
This hire is weird because it seems he's better with DEs. But the assumpti9n is he's here to replace Link.

re: 2026 Portal Tracker

Posted by surgicalvenom on 12/31/25 at 1:18 pm to
Interesting name hit the portal. Michael Hawkins from OU. Would be good competition with Zollars. We would also get his brothe Maliek as a DB which we need. Hawkins flashed some ability. Will need to grow so is perfect to battle Zollars for QB1.
Once again, 80% of these guys fail. Regardless of system. Given a longer timeline probably 95% have shite stats.

The question that you should be asking is what is the trait the 20% have? We should be interested in what makes a good coach instead of trying to prove who is a bad coach.
1st...2 weeks ago it was the Pedersen tree that was no good, now its the Malzahn tree.

2nd...80% of D1 coaches will be fired within 5 years.

Conclusion...Given a long enough timeline, with an 80% failure rate, any and all coaching trees will cease to produce. The challenge is recognizing the traits of the 20% who succeed regardless of "tree." IMHO, that trait is "in game presence." Meaning not only the ability to manage your team, but adjust to exploit the weaknesses of the opponent. Most coaches, OCs are lazy and/or unable to truly see from both sidelines. Drink and Moore are prime examples. Kiffin is probably the best in the game.

It's easy to condemn a coaching tree when the odds are 80/20 that you will be right. But its the individual traits that get you the 20% successful coaches. Im hoping with his experience, that Chip can see both sidelines and use whatever offense to be successful. Let's face it, the reason Malzahn or Pedersen or Saban have coaching trees to start with is because at some point they were successful.

Stop pissing about the new OC

Posted by surgicalvenom on 12/27/25 at 10:36 pm
We don't need some innovative offense. All we need is someone with an "in game" presence. Neither Moore or Drink have any idea what to do once the game starts. They both are so smart off the field, but piss down their leg on gameday. As long as Lindsey isnt the type to be intimidated during the game, we should be fine.
Actually its not that bad. If fired tonight, we pay him 7 million per year for 5 years offset by his salary from his new job.
Coleman was wide open for a TD. He is pissed.
The new OC may not be exciting, but he calls a better game than Drink.
I agree with taking Hardy out, can't risk the stutter step, but not running Roberts was stupid.
Run Roberts to the left, all he had to do.
Hardy probably said he's hitting the portal at halftime.
Gotta now use a bag on a qb with a pair
Hall, and Banner were such a waste of scholarships