Any Ideas on what happens to the Big12 and PacW?

I feel like the Big 12 raids and gets a few schools like Colorado, Utah, Memphis, Boise etc. Don't feel like they're going down any time soon, they seem stable and are in the position to take a G5 school

The Pac-10 is just dead

The 12 needs to drop WV and UC and go get AZ, AZ State, Utah, Colorado while they can.

Sec is taking Colorado and Utah pretty sure so no

This guy gets it

PAC is definitely dead.

CU no idea what happens to them. Back to the b12 makes the most sense.

I am wondering about Kansas. They are AAU and maybe they are in the plans for either the Big10 or SEC next round? They are dumping money into modernizing their football stadium. If they stabilize as a .500 football team - they already make decent money off of basketball- would this make them attractive enough to the SEC?

quote:

---

I feel like the Big 12 raids and gets a few schools like Colorado, Utah, Memphis, Boise etc. Don't feel like they're going down any time soon, they seem stable and are in the position to take a G5 school

The Pac-10 is just dead

---

If this was a steel cage death match, my money would certainly be on the Big XII, but I'm not sure it will come down to that. I think the Big XII is on more stable footing, but I doubt that their position is strong enough to lure any Pac-12 teams unless that league just totally implodes (which could happen, but hasn't yet).

I don't see Colorado being first to leave the Pac-12; that's where they have always wanted to be, and they get a lot of their students from California. Besides, they really bring very little to the table. They are overshadowed by the Broncos, who cast one of the longest shadows in the NFL (they dominate Denver and the RM region in a way that other NFL teams do not), and, outside Denver, there's a lot of empty spaces around CU.

Utah probably will be happy to be in a different conference from BYU, as long as there is no compelling economic reason for them to jump.

The Arizona schools look to California, like CU, and don't want to recreate the old Border Conference that they once shared with Texas Tech.

Oregon and Washington would be somewhat attractive if they were located in the Midwest -- in the Pacific Northwest, they just don't bring enough to be worth the trouble.

they are going to make a mockery of what the conferences use to be is my feeling, especially the sec and b10 dont care about anything but money

Getting some school like Colorado to pair up with tranny vandy will raise the profile of the sec

Utah just because like I said., you are not going to take just one school at a time any more like with arky back in the day .

I dont think they want like NC STATE and Clemson maybe I am wrong however but I think they go west for prestige I bet central HQ is tired of getting laughed at as a bunch of dumb southern hicks

quote:

---

Can you explain?

---

see what I wrote above a lot of its guesswork and speculate but I think the twats running the show are going to feel pressure from UT-Autism and tranny vandy to elevate the conference

quote:

---

2. ND “has” a home in the ACC. Who knows what they will do. They have three options.
Stay indy, Big 10 or ACC.

---

They have been in the ACC for a decade now, as the old Domers die off it will become a formality

quote:

---

Keep in mind. The ACC seems to be in a tight spot as well.

---

ACC was dead man walking before the first realignment. they are in the catbird seat now. Still don't get why most folks don't see this?

Best thing the PAC and B12 can do is pick the best 12 - 16 teams and ditch the rest. This will not happen as neither has leadership with half a brain.