Started By
Message
re: Alabama retakes the #1 spot from Texas A&M in the 247 Sports 2022 recruiting rankings
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:06 pm to Windy City
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:06 pm to Windy City
Are transfers not part of a recruiting class?
1
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:06 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Why would we melt? We took ONE incoming transfer.
You will be taking a lot more next year when the mass exodus begins
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:07 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Why would we melt? We took ONE incoming transfer. Alabama took 3.
And?
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:08 pm to RollTide1987
Alabama doing things the right way pays off.
That, or...
Alabama $$$ >>>>> A&M $$$
Either way, it's a blow to the ego.
That, or...
Alabama $$$ >>>>> A&M $$$
Either way, it's a blow to the ego.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:09 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
You have to click the drop down menu where it says "recruit" and select "overall".
I would think if 247 was really trying to analyze the impact of transfers, they would net it against all the kids leaving the program. That would be pretty interesting.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:10 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:This is tSECRant.
Why would we melt?
Facts do not matter.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:10 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Wait
They are changing rankings with transfers in
Too funny
Are they also including the transfers out
My guess, no
They are changing rankings with transfers in
Too funny
Are they also including the transfers out
My guess, no
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:10 pm to RollTide1987
How is this possible? I thought A&M had already spiked the football and printed cups for their national recruiting championship...
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:11 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Are transfers not part of a recruiting class?
I have never thought of it that way. Maybe but the actual "recruiting rankings" each year tend to be just the kids inking scholarships.
I suppose with the portal trending the way it is, transfers should be counted as well as transfers out to gauge some actual increase in talent.
As you can tell, I work a lot in data analytics and this stuff probably means more to me than most others.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:11 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
All it took was Rivals cooking the books deliberately so that Georgia and A&M dropped while Alabama went up.
You almost have to admire their unabashed homerism at this point.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:12 pm to Whentheleveebreaks
quote:
Are they also including the transfers out
My guess, no
How would that impact an incoming class at all?
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:17 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Maybe just maybe some of their signed '22 recruits can count back to the '21 class.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:17 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Shhhhhh, just wait till they come to the conclusion after beating their chest all off-season that they’re STILL shitty arse A&M who has not and will not win anything of significance. They couldn’t even buy a number 1 recruiting class. Even better, they’re big brother is coming take the only advantage they held on to so tightly, the only Texas team in the SEC.
Aggies, always fun to laugh at
Aggies, always fun to laugh at
This post was edited on 1/26/22 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:19 pm to RollTide1987
Awesome. Aggie loses their bragging rights and Bama's loss to Aggie in 2021 gets cancelled out. Print the t-shirts, Gump. But don't make a painting or distribute the cups, Aggie.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:21 pm to Windy City
quote:
I suppose with the portal trending the way it is, transfers should be counted as well as transfers out to gauge some actual increase in talent.
They've never combined people leaving with people incoming. Their job is to rate your incoming recruiting class. People transferring out, going to the NFL, being kicked off the team, etc...is all the same result of players leaving, but it's silly to try and pseudo combine that into a "recruiting class" rating.
This post was edited on 1/26/22 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:24 pm to thunderbird1100
Whatever helps you sleep at night bud
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:25 pm to RandySavage
Ahh . . . .I found the background.
LINK
Must be a very recent change.
LINK
quote:
The Quandary Facing Recruiting Outlets in a Fluid Era of Transfers in College Football
Transfers don’t currently factor into a team’s recruiting ranking, but that may soon be changing.
Must be a very recent change.
This post was edited on 1/26/22 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:26 pm to Whentheleveebreaks
quote:
Whatever helps you sleep at night bud
I'm just giving you the obvious explanation here.
If you want a net team talent, they have a "college team talent" rating they show which is all the talent/ratings on a team in a given year here.
It's not really all that new.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:26 pm to Windy City
This isn't the first year 247 has started rating transfers. But it is the first year they have a new "overall" team calc with it included in with recruits. Which it's obvious they need to start considering the volume of them now.
It wasnt really impactful on a class to have 1-2-3 transfers so much. Now we're seeing teams with 5-10-15 coming in.
It wasnt really impactful on a class to have 1-2-3 transfers so much. Now we're seeing teams with 5-10-15 coming in.
This post was edited on 1/26/22 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:29 pm to RollTide1987
Is it just me, or is National Signing Day a week from today?
Perhaps we should wait until then to crown the #1 class.
- OR -
I guess the aggies can continue to ejaculate prematurely, it seems they're still #1 in that category.
Perhaps we should wait until then to crown the #1 class.
- OR -
I guess the aggies can continue to ejaculate prematurely, it seems they're still #1 in that category.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News