Started By
Message
PFF highest returning big uglies on offense.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 2/19/20 at 4:22 pm
Brent Rollins
@PFF_Brent
#SEC Highest-graded returning O-linemen
Darian Kinnard, UK - 89.2
Jamaree Salyer, UGA - 81.3
Trey Smith, UT - 78.6
Landon Young, UK - 78.3
Drake Jackson, UK - 78.0
Ben Cleveland, UGA - 77.4
Luke Fortner, UK - 77.0
Carson Green, A&M - 76.3
Trey Hill, UGA - 73.6
linky
@PFF_Brent
#SEC Highest-graded returning O-linemen
Darian Kinnard, UK - 89.2
Jamaree Salyer, UGA - 81.3
Trey Smith, UT - 78.6
Landon Young, UK - 78.3
Drake Jackson, UK - 78.0
Ben Cleveland, UGA - 77.4
Luke Fortner, UK - 77.0
Carson Green, A&M - 76.3
Trey Hill, UGA - 73.6
linky
9
Posted on 2/19/20 at 4:23 pm to hoojy
That cant be. UGA lost 4 starters on the OL (or did we?)
Posted on 2/19/20 at 4:42 pm to meansonny
quote:
That cant be. UGA lost 4 starters on the OL (or did we?)
Correction: "UGA lost 12 starters on the O-Line and a QB just as good as Joe Burrow. I'll close with 1492, 1776, 1865 and other famous years in history."
Posted on 2/19/20 at 4:45 pm to hoojy
Where’s Cade Mays?
Posted on 2/19/20 at 4:52 pm to hoojy
So Alabama had the #3 offensive line in the country and #2 in the SEC per PFF and none of the 4 returning starters is a Top 10 OL in the league or has an above average grade per PFF?
Seems strange. I guess Jedrick Wills was a 1 man show.
Seems strange. I guess Jedrick Wills was a 1 man show.
This post was edited on 2/19/20 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 2/19/20 at 4:54 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Because yall suck!! 
Posted on 2/19/20 at 4:55 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
Because yall suck!!
BUT THEY SAID WE DIDNT SUCK
I CANT RECONCILE THE VARIOUS AMOUNTS OF ASSIGNED SUCKAGE FROM THE SAME GROUP OF PEOPLE
Posted on 2/19/20 at 4:58 pm to hoojy
quote:
Carson Green, A&M - 76.3
And with that, PFF loses ALL credibility. Carson Green may be our worst returning lineman.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 5:03 pm to diddlydawg7
quote:
Where’s Cade Mays?
Combing his neck beard.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 5:21 pm to hoojy
Not dismissing it, because I think UK had a good line last year, but how much are their grades pumped up because they basically never dropped back to pass the entire second half of the season?
Posted on 2/19/20 at 5:25 pm to xenythx
quote:
Not dismissing it, because I think UK had a good line last year, but how much are their grades pumped up because they basically never dropped back to pass the entire second half of the season?
I'd like insight into a lot of the PFF methodology. The list does seem skewed toward players who spent most of their time run blocking.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 5:27 pm to hoojy
Tenner fans told me they had the best OL EVER. What gives?
Posted on 2/19/20 at 5:34 pm to xenythx
quote:
Not dismissing it, because I think UK had a good line last year, but how much are their grades pumped up because they basically never dropped back to pass the entire second half of the season?
This is a good question. I have nothing to add.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 5:35 pm to xenythx
That's true. Although, OTOH, this metric also takes run blocking when everybody and their mother knows you're running the ball.
It goes both ways.
It goes both ways.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 5:40 pm to hoojy
One of the worst things about PFF is that it doesn’t factor in levels of competition into its formula. It looks at outcomes in black and white. Who cares if you steamroll over your FCS opponent if you perform thoroughly mediocre against your in conference opponents?
Some one off big plays can dramatically influence their data points as well.
Some of their metrics are great, but a lot of them are poop.
Some one off big plays can dramatically influence their data points as well.
Some of their metrics are great, but a lot of them are poop.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 5:42 pm to TheeRealCarolina
I'm not saying it's the gospel or anything. Just an actuall off-season topic.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 7:05 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Their "formula" or whatever really is strange. It's like the wr rankings yesterday with the LSU kids. Burrow averaged less than 10 incompletions per game but the percentages of catch/target ratios were lower than his completion percentage. There weren't enough incompletions to go around to get those numbers.
If there were I'd like to see Jefferson, Moss and CEHs numbers. They had to have been astronomical
If there were I'd like to see Jefferson, Moss and CEHs numbers. They had to have been astronomical
Posted on 2/19/20 at 7:07 pm to xenythx
quote:
Not dismissing it, because I think UK had a good line last year, but how much are their grades pumped up because they basically never dropped back to pass the entire second half of the season?
I’d make the argument that on the flipside they created some pretty big lanes for Bowden and the RBs when everyone in the country was stacking the box and knew the run was coming. They were very, very good at getting that push this last season.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 7:10 pm to hoojy
Impressive. It seems like like an 8-4 season isn't out of the question in Kentucky.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 7:28 pm to RollTide1987
quote:We won 8 with the 5th string QB option last year, won 10 the yr before. We'll be seeing you in Atlanta in December baw.
Impressive. It seems like like an 8-4 season isn't out of the question in Kentucky.
This post was edited on 2/19/20 at 7:30 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News