Started By
Message
Sec basketball renaissance. Fake news
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:12 pm
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:12 pm
It’s still Kentucky and no one else
14
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:13 pm to MeatPants
Alabama. Final Four. 2019.
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:14 pm to MeatPants
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:14 pm to MeatPants
and what Conference is your best, Sir?
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:15 pm to MeatPants
Nah. It's a start with 8 teams in and multiple winning in the first round.
shite happens. Just ask our whole damn bracket.
shite happens. Just ask our whole damn bracket.
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:16 pm to MeatPants
Disagree. The fact that the middle of the pack in the SEC even made the tournament represents an improvement from the times only three teams got in.
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:19 pm to BluegrassBelle
We will see. The sec was full of a bunch of 12-15 loss teams that made the tournament
The big ten and pac 12 were inordinately bad this year.
Maybe this is a starting point for the conference but o could see a correction to the mean next year
Water always finds Its level
The big ten and pac 12 were inordinately bad this year.
Maybe this is a starting point for the conference but o could see a correction to the mean next year
Water always finds Its level
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:22 pm to MeatPants
It's still the best program in the conference getting lucky arse shite thrown their way. Nothing against UK right now though. They're finally hitting shots.
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:25 pm to jsmoove
There were some good teams in the SEC the year but parity seems to be everywhere except the PAC 12
Can't help but feel like this tournament is a lost opportunity for the SEC though.
Can't help but feel like this tournament is a lost opportunity for the SEC though.
This post was edited on 3/17/18 at 10:28 pm
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:29 pm to MeatPants
quote:
We will see. The sec was full of a bunch of 12-15 loss teams that made the tournament
SEC was better on average than all the other conferences
The top of the SEC wasn't as good as all the others
SEC should be significantly better at the top next year. Probably 7-8 tournament teams though
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:30 pm to MeatPants
Damn it wasn't an all-SEC Elite 8? SEC must suck.
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:31 pm to MeatPants
I think this tournament proved exactly what most of us thought - a lot of solid teams, not really any legit championship contenders.
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:33 pm to MeatPants
quote:
It’s still Kentucky and no one else
Since 2006 UF has 2 NC's, 3 Final Fours and 7 Elite 8's. 29-7 in our tournament games. Not a whole lot of schools that can match those numbers. We've held our own.
This post was edited on 3/17/18 at 10:34 pm
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:35 pm to LouisvilleKat
quote:
There were some good teams in the SEC the year
Painful wondering what might have been if Auburn had just sat their shitty playing starters against USC in the 2nd half. That injury was like chopping our dick off. UT has no excuse.
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:36 pm to MeatPants
WHEREAS Florida beat Kentucky at home and on the road.
WHEREAS Florida henceforth gets to claim any future glory and/or accomplishments.
WHEREAS I'm sad and I hope Kentucky does well.
WHEREAS Florida henceforth gets to claim any future glory and/or accomplishments.
WHEREAS I'm sad and I hope Kentucky does well.
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:36 pm to MeatPants
I can see how you think that in year one of Auburn's come up, but Auburn and Pearl are finna win a lot of games together over the next several years.
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:39 pm to BowlJackson
Amended. Kentucky and Florida. And no one else
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:41 pm to MeatPants
Dude I think most agreed that the SEC was full of good teams without any necessarily great teams
And the SEC went 6-2 in the first round so it's not like this tournament was a dud the way it was for the Pac-12 or the ACC minus Duke and UNC
Besides, about Kentucky, I'm pretty sure UF would have beaten Davidson and Buffalo
And the SEC went 6-2 in the first round so it's not like this tournament was a dud the way it was for the Pac-12 or the ACC minus Duke and UNC
Besides, about Kentucky, I'm pretty sure UF would have beaten Davidson and Buffalo
This post was edited on 3/17/18 at 10:43 pm
Posted on 3/18/18 at 3:11 pm to MeatPants
SEC basketball wasn’t top heavy this year. It just had an overall increase in talent and depth. That was proven to be true when 8 teams got in and 6 won their first round matchup.
Posted on 3/18/18 at 3:15 pm to jsmoove
quote:
Painful wondering what might have been if Auburn had just sat their shitty playing starters against USC in the 2nd half.
Except McLemore broke his leg in the 1st half against USCjr. It was only like 7 or 8 minutes into the game I think.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News