Started By
Message
So the Alabama targeting play last night
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:30 am
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:30 am
So I'm sure this has been discussed to death here, but I don't care.
Was there seriously no flag here? Can anyone explain this away?
Was there seriously no flag here? Can anyone explain this away?
This post was edited on 11/17/13 at 6:14 pm
36
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:31 am to OBReb6
He used his shoulder I guess
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:32 am to OBReb6
No flag. But shoulda been
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:32 am to OBReb6
make up no call for... ummm... something... somewhere, sometime that happened?
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:32 am to OBReb6
That was probably the most flagrant targeting foul I have seen all year.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:32 am to OBReb6
Is a PR who fails to call a fair catch considered a defenseless player? As far as I know, he isn't.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:33 am to OBReb6
So sayeth slive so it shall be.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:34 am to OBReb6
I thought it should have been flagged. The only thing is he used his shoulder. Not much consistency to those calls.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:34 am to OBReb6
Holy shite. Missed that as I didn't watch much of the bama game.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:35 am to OBReb6
I honestly don't know. The rule is so damn subjective that it's ridiculous.
That play certainly looks like the type of play they want to eliminate. So did the hit last week by LSU on Kevin Norwood. Neither were called despite being clearly seen. Then there are examples of light contact being flagged against UGA.
Just a ridiculous situation.
That play certainly looks like the type of play they want to eliminate. So did the hit last week by LSU on Kevin Norwood. Neither were called despite being clearly seen. Then there are examples of light contact being flagged against UGA.
Just a ridiculous situation.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:35 am to OBReb6
Shoulder in the chest.
Targeting according to tRant
Targeting according to tRant
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:38 am to OBReb6
poor defenseless player.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:38 am to OBReb6
quote:
Was there seriously no flag here?
Where did you learn to speak English?
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:38 am to OBReb6
quote:
Was there seriously no flag here? Can anyone explain this away?
The witness was unable to testify, so charges were dropped.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:39 am to OBReb6
Definitely a missed call. I'm guessing the ref or refs were out of position because they're usually overly eager to make those calls this year
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:39 am to OBReb6
Shoulda been called.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 9:56 am to OBReb6
I was waiting on the flag.
That said, the rule is stupid, and there was a time that was a sportscenter great play.
That said, the rule is stupid, and there was a time that was a sportscenter great play.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 10:11 am to OBReb6
I didn't see if there was a fair catch called beforehand, so I can't attest to that part of it but it's a clean hit to me. I wouldn't call 75% of the targeting calls a penalty to begin with.
The whole thing is too ambiguous and up to interpretation/POV/opinion of trajectory/intent/timing to be objectively enforced effectively.
The whole thing is too ambiguous and up to interpretation/POV/opinion of trajectory/intent/timing to be objectively enforced effectively.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 10:12 am to OBReb6
Don't know how they missed that...it's KCI
Posted on 11/17/13 at 10:22 am to OBReb6
Clean hit. Sick of targeting bullshite. People don't even realize they're being indoctrinated.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News