Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Here's a hot take: most bowls have always been meaningless

Posted on 12/8/25 at 8:30 am
Posted by AshleySchaeffer
Lake Placid, Fl
Member since Sep 2015
1091 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 8:30 am
Good morning and happy Monday to all you dollar store aristocrats, fried bologna boppers, and Twinkie filling enthusiasts,

To let a naysayer know, most bowl games since the 60s have been "meaningless." Perhaps one could say the 1984 Holiday Bowl where an undefeated BYU team was crowned national champions because the powers that be could not stomach crowning the Florida Gators national champions.

Point is nothing has really changed with bowl games. Someone was always going to be unhappy and the majority of games were fan service and allowed teams to play in unusual matchups in sunny weather and perhaps charge up the fanbase for the next season. Its always been about the sponsorships (there have always been ridiculously named bowl games).

What has changed is the the whining and pussification of the athletes and the fans. "Oh but Ashely Schaeffer but but but what about the playoffs and muh feelings?" frick you. If the athletes don't want to go on a trip and play a game they all supposedly love, that's on them. But the stakes and the glory for most bowl games is mostly been zero.

But instead of playing for pride, teams now want to throw their sucker in the sand and cry to their mothers when its not for a chance at a title because, like fans, they feel entitled and are "above" the Gator Bowl.

I also think its hilarious the same fans that bitch about the sport being ruined also bitch the most about playing in "meaningless bowls." You're the fricking problem you complain about. Suck on that doodad.
Posted by UncleRoll
Member since Sep 2025
297 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 8:49 am to
Ding, ding ding! Tell him what he won Johnny.
Posted by msudawg1200
Central Mississippi
Member since Jun 2014
10665 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 9:25 am to
What? So, you're telling me the 1981 Hall of Fame Bowl between 7-4 State and 8-3 Kansas didn't really matter? Or the 1983 Independence Bowl between 6-5 Ole Miss and 9-2 Air Force? Or the 1987 Gator Bowl between 9-1-1 LSU and 8-3 South Carolina? Or the 1994 Fiesta Bowl between 10-1 Colorado and 6-4-1 Notre Dame? You are correct all were meaningless in the gist of it all. As you said, entitlement and pussification of the trophy generation is the change.
Posted by JacieNY
Member since Jul 2024
1733 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 9:33 am to
One consequence of bowl games has and continues to be pairing teams that have no history with each other so there is that.

An example is Oklahoma and Mississippi, two teams that previously had played only once before 2023 in the Independence Bowl.

Oklahoma and Alabama have so far played each other 8 times, 4 of them bowl games.

There are numerous other examples of this in the Oklahoma record book and no doubt every other team must have experienced the same thing.

I am glad Oklahoma has never been reduced to being invited to the Bahama Bowl or the Famous Idaho Potato Bowl but if they were it would probably be against a team they had never faced prior to it.

Posted by TheTideMustRoll
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2009
10206 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 9:33 am to
quote:

fried bologna boppers


If you feel you're too good for fried bologna then kindly see yourself to the door.
Posted by Oklahomey
Bucksnort, TN
Member since Mar 2013
5847 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 9:36 am to
1991 Florida Citrus Bowl also had meaning since a win gave GT a share of the national title.
Posted by AshleySchaeffer
Lake Placid, Fl
Member since Sep 2015
1091 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 9:37 am to
quote:

If you feel you're too good for fried bologna then kindly see yourself to the door.


Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
37053 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 9:40 am to
quote:

Here's a hot take: most bowls have always been meaningless
That's not really true and before there were 50 bowls, I really looked forward to bowl seasons. New Years Day bowls were always something I would completely cancel anything else I had planned for that day (usually came home from deer camp). Usually, a national champion (although mythical) came out of one of those bowls and that was acceptable for years. The lesser bowls offered more practice, a special watch the players could wear forever, and a little scratch to cover expenses for the schools. NOW, the bowls are pretty meaningless until way after Christmas.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
28599 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Here's a hot take: most bowls have always been meaningless


That's not really true and before there were 50 bowls, I really looked forward to bowl seasons. New Years Day bowls were always something I would completely cancel anything else I had planned for that day (usually came home from deer camp). Usually, a national champion (although mythical) came out of one of those bowls and that was acceptable for years. The lesser bowls offered more practice, a special watch the players could wear forever, and a little scratch to cover expenses for the schools. NOW, the bowls are pretty meaningless until way after Christmas.


Bowls used to be a big deal when there were half as many.
Posted by TulsaSooner78
Member since Aug 2025
933 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 9:59 am to
quote:

You're the fricking problem you complain about. Suck on that doodad.


I'm guessing are a member of the Gator Bowl committee and are afraid you're about to lose your easy payday.
Posted by TulsaSooner78
Member since Aug 2025
933 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 10:04 am to
quote:

I am glad Oklahoma has never been reduced to being invited to the Bahama Bowl or the Famous Idaho Potato Bowl but if they were it would probably be against a team they had never faced prior to it.


2024 - Armed Forces Bowl vs Navy

We had played Navy only once before. 1965 in Norman. We lost 10 - 0.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
25212 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Ashely Schaeffer

You misspell your own username and expect us to take this seriously?


(FTR, I actually agree. I’m just a bit of a Nazi about these things.)
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
24867 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 10:07 am to
quote:

I am glad Oklahoma has never been reduced to being invited to the Bahama Bowl or the Famous Idaho Potato Bowl


Buddy, you played Ole Miss in the Independence bowl in Shreveport, it is basically the same thing.

Fun fact - I was there for that game and the end of the world happening of Y2K. It was weird celebrating a victory and waiting for planes to fall out of the sky.
Posted by msudawg1200
Central Mississippi
Member since Jun 2014
10665 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 10:28 am to
quote:

That's not really true and before there were 50 bowls, I really looked forward to bowl seasons. New Years Day bowls were always something I would completely cancel anything else I had planned for that day (usually came home from deer camp). Usually, a national champion (although mythical) came out of one of those bowls and that was acceptable for years. The lesser bowls offered more practice, a special watch the players could wear forever, and a little scratch to cover expenses for the schools. NOW, the bowls are pretty meaningless until way after Christmas.

I remember the good ol' days where January 1 was the greatest day of the year. You had the Cotton on CBS around 12, Rose on NBC around 4, Sugar on ABC at 7(some years at 2:30), and Orange on NBC at 7. They added the Fiesta on NBC at 12 in 1981, and it eventually grew into a major bowl. These games featured conference champions of the SEC, B1G, PAC, SWC, and Big 8 with the major independents sprinkled in. Still, except for a few years like 1983, there was only one bowl that really mattered as far a national championship was concerned. The bowls created for great debate according to what happened, because there was no "official" champion. Most bowls were still, however, meaningless.

Many mention the fact that more bowls today have glutted everything up. Most of these new bowls are games for G5 teams. Back in say, 1983, most only major teams went to bowl games. You didn't have 6 teams from the MAC ,and 8 teams from the WAC, and 7 teams from the PCAA going. You had 1 from each. in 1983, the SEC had 7 of 10 teams make a bowl which is 70%. in 2025, 11 of 16 SEC teams made the postseason which is 69%. The reason it seems shittier now is because you have bowls with say, a 6-6 Western Michigan playing a 6-6 Old Dominion. The bowls with two P4 teams and a good G5 playing a P4 team are still for the most part pretty interesting. I don't mind having USC vs TCU on the TV in late December. I also can watch that made up Western Michigan vs Old Dominion and be happy. If you don't like college football don't watch. If you do watch. I'm just tired of the same bitching over and over about it every year.
Posted by generalgator87
Member since Nov 2022
658 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 10:43 am to
Honestly, I don't care if they are meaningless. They are football and I like watching football. I went to the Gasparilla Bowl last year. It was definitely meaningless. But I got to watch the Gators win, so I really enjoyed it.

Sometimes meaningless is fun. One night stands are meaningless. Doesn't mean I didn't enjoy them in my single days.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
6798 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 10:46 am to
You’re right, but you’re not 100% right.

The NYD bowls once carried prestige a tier above the rest. Sometimes teams that won them would even claim illegitimate national titles.

The rest though? Yeah they didn’t change.
Only the times.
Posted by StopRobot
Mobile, AL
Member since May 2013
15727 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:23 am to
You get an extra month of practice and film. Thats the most important part
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter