User Avatar

DeathByTossDive225

Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Baton Rouge
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:7723
Registered on:9/3/2019
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: 7-1

Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 3/19/26 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

Speaking for myself. Some of the team watched too many good pitches with runners in scoring positions. Missing out on timely hitting. But did see some improvement for sure.

Yeah but you sound level headed. Most of the front page sound like they’re getting ready to mail JJ angry letters.
quote:

The other stuff was a thing, but I'm open, honest and have apologized to everyone.

I can’t tell if you’re messing with me. Have an upvote & we’ll talk when you’re sober.
quote:

Until something happens, why bother? The odds are McMahon will be back next year.

In magnitudes of “why bother”, you’ve one-upped anyone dreamcasting coaches by making a topic to tell them that you don’t like it when they do that.

At least they’re talking about sports.

I like McMahon. I think at this point perception matters & there’s no way for him to turn this around at LSU. The program needs a shot in the arm. He’s most likely a lame duck even if coaching next year.

People are just entertaining themselves, why are you bothered?
quote:

Neither are you are fans, but why?!?

Drizz you drinking bro?
quote:

I'd just like an answer. Has he been fired yet?

That’s not the question you asked, but it is one that google can answer
MBB fans gotta talk about something, we been living in squalor.

re: 7-1

Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 3/19/26 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

WHATDOIKNO

You win the thread lol

re: 7-1

Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 3/19/26 at 10:04 pm to
I just really would’ve expected people to learn after last year. Team is going to improve just like JJ’s teams have every year he has been here.

7-1

Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 3/19/26 at 9:57 pm
Can someone fill me in on why the board is melting & angry at half the roster?

re: Cost of living?

Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 3/19/26 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

More are than aren't.

I’m seeing that new builds are more popular than they used to be but still a minority of purchases.

Numbers vary 10-30% depending on the source. Most of the increase in new builds was after Covid due to incentives.

I think even if this were true, anyone who has bought or sold an existing house in the last decade can attest to the inflation in that market.

re: Cost of living?

Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 3/19/26 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

Majority of people are building houses much more elaborate than what the average homeowner had in the past.

Majority of people are not moving into newly built houses. My house was built in the 70s. It’s a shitfrickton more expensive now than it was in the 70s, 80s, 90s, or even the 2000s.

If that trend continues, and every indication is that it will, that’s great for me.

Notsomuch for any kids who don’t yet own homes.

quote:

Goes hand in hand with the $80,000 vehicles

This is definitely not most people either.
Well this guy is officially full of shite.
Since 2004? JCPOA was 2016 :lol:

re: Cost of living?

Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 3/19/26 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

People today are making decisions that make homeownership tougher (student debt is 100% voluntary. Smart kids pay $0 for school, but move out of the house and have to finance what every 18 year old who moves out of the house for trades pays out of pocket.... housing and food).

Whether you wear a suit or work a trade, housing is more expensive. People should be able to make an honest living however they like if they work hard for it. That said, paying flagship U prices for just any degree without a plan is no longer good advice.

It’s still too expensive & I’m not going to blame people who want to go to school for that.

quote:

Im not sure i 100% understand what you keep referencing with consolidation.

Consolidation, acquisition, merger, the largest company’s becoming larger, competition becoming less etc.

Economies of scale actually show there are efficiency benefits to monopolies (I’m using the term as an extreme example of consolidation)... so the global GDP arms race favors national politics friendly to consolidation. The flip side of that is excess consolidation eventually has very negative consequences domestically.

In this way, the whole first world economy is walking a sort of tight rope… but that turn of phrase may be generous because the numbers consistently only trend in one direction.
quote:

Again, I would like to see what Solomon is referring to, what newly released "evidence" is there?

OP is a Q guy. Timeoday makes 10 topics here daily usually just Twitter embeds & might be a paid op. The only thing this post is missing is AlterEd talking about aliens.

re: Cost of living?

Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 3/19/26 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

Blame that on student debt. "The average total student loan debt per borrower in the U.S. is approximately $43,333." Beginning adulthood in the hole sucks.

The cost has gone up & the value has gone down (because more people have degrees). I’m still glad I got mine, but I don’t think anyone can argue with that... It shouldn’t be as expensive as it is.

re: Cost of living?

Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 3/19/26 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

I guess i was asking if you were inferring anything from the data.

Good question. Personally I think it’s gradually gotten tougher for young people since the 80s + I think both industry and wealth have shown trends of consolidating. But it’s important to point out that this isn’t a US-specific phenomenon.

I don’t love it, because I do think consolidating industry can hurt social mobility & mitigate many of the benefits of capitalism. I also think a lot of it is overblown & the biggest concern for the middle class is just housing affordability…

For now.

If AI cuts as many white collar jobs as the alarmists believe it will, combined with how much more prevalent moneyed special interests have become in govt the last 20 some odd years, I can see a path where class tension becomes a legitimately severe and concerning issue.

re: Cost of living?

Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 3/19/26 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

Nominally median income nearly doubled, but inflation has been such an issue the past 20 years that real median only went up around 15% per US census.

Which part? I was explaining how Tammany came up with 15% when you came up with 100%.

There was mixing of nominal, real, individual, and household data. Got to compare apples to apples.

re: Cost of living?

Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 3/19/26 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

That explains most changes... yes things are more expensive, but these home buyer charts do not take into consideration the ever lengthening of early adulthood.

Increasingly expensive necessities moreso helps explain than it does contradict people putting off things for longer no?

re: Cost of living?

Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 3/19/26 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

I'd like to see a comparative chart of education and marriage.

I don’t think I need a chart for this. Going out on a limb & gonna guess people are more educated and less married :lol:

re: Cost of living?

Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 3/19/26 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

If the average is only up 15%, then that would negate the argument of an ever increasing wealth gap. The extremes heavily influence means

Your second sentence here is the reason the first isn’t true.

Also the rest of your logic for the most part is correct, but your numbers are off.

Nominally median income nearly doubled, but inflation has been such an issue the past 20 years that real median only went up around 15% per US census.

This country both left & right would be riding high on a heater + shite wouldn’t be nearly as divided as it has been if real median income had actually doubled the past 20 years.

re: Cost of living?

Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 3/19/26 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

This is the difference between comfortable people and poorer people. And why poorer people aren't comfortable.

I don’t think this is true of all poor people. But yes, many people are incredibly fiscally irresponsible.