Started By
Message
Most Important Positions/Position Groups for College Football Success
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:43 am
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:43 am
What positions are most important for success? I think most agree in today’s era, QB is most important. What about the rest? I’d rank it as:
QB
Interior Defensive Line (DT/NG)
Exterior Offensive Line (T)
Exterior Defensive Line (DE)
Interior Offensive Line (G/C)
CB
WR
LB
S
RB
TE
K
P
KR
PR
I am sure some here will disagree, but I think outside of QB, the lines are more important than any other position on the field. Thoughts?
QB
Interior Defensive Line (DT/NG)
Exterior Offensive Line (T)
Exterior Defensive Line (DE)
Interior Offensive Line (G/C)
CB
WR
LB
S
RB
TE
K
P
KR
PR
I am sure some here will disagree, but I think outside of QB, the lines are more important than any other position on the field. Thoughts?
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:44 am to captdalton
Thats a pretty good list QB and LOS is king.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:45 am to captdalton
That probably the hierarchy of NIL, with some position groups falling off faster in $, WR4 vs IDL4.
This post was edited on 3/25/25 at 10:47 am
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:47 am to captdalton
I’d move RB up. This isn’t the NFL. RB’s aren’t interchangeable in college football. And if you can’t run the ball you are absolutely fricked. See Ole Miss this year after losing Judkins and running a walk on against Kentucky. Judkins gets Ole Miss the win in every game we lost by simply getting tough yardage when needed to close out games.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 11:09 am to captdalton
QB
CB
Exterior Offensive Line (T)
Interior Defensive Line (DT/NG)
WR
Exterior Defensive Line (DE)
Interior Offensive Line (G/C)
LB
K
S
RB
TE
P
KR
PR
CB
Exterior Offensive Line (T)
Interior Defensive Line (DT/NG)
WR
Exterior Defensive Line (DE)
Interior Offensive Line (G/C)
LB
K
S
RB
TE
P
KR
PR
Posted on 3/25/25 at 11:11 am to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
if you can’t run the ball you are absolutely fricked.
If you can't block then you can't run.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 11:23 am to captdalton
Makes sense. I might place safeties above LBs just because most defenses these days incorporate 3 safeties and 2 LBs. I know Mizzou's safeties play a big roll in the passing and running game.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 11:42 am to captdalton
From what I’ve seen from our team, if we don’t have a good offensive line we don’t have crap. Three and out, defense on the field all game and worn down.
The oline is where it starts for me.
Look at what the eagles did to the chiefs.
The oline is where it starts for me.
Look at what the eagles did to the chiefs.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 12:53 pm to captdalton
It's more important to have a lack of weak spots for the other team to exploit.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:41 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
I’d move RB up. This isn’t the NFL.
I agree. I think RB should be ranked above WR. With a good QB you can win with only serviceable WRs in college as long as your running game is reliable. Conversely, trying to win with a good QB, good WRs, and a crappy running game is not a good recipe for success.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:57 pm to captdalton
quote:I'd normally agree... or even say the lines are MORE important than the QB.
I am sure some here will disagree, but I think outside of QB, the lines are more important than any other position on the field. Thoughts?
LSU's making me rethink that after the past few seasons. In 2023 we had arguably the best QB in college, and a decent O Line. Lost 3 games. 2024, we had the same O Line, which due to experience you'd upgrade to "good", and a very capable QB. Lost 4 games.
We had a terrible secondary in both seasons, and that caused those losses. It doesn't matter if you score 40 points, if the other team cruises right down the field and scores every time you do.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 2:00 pm to TheTideMustRoll
The offensive line is the key to a quality running game, not the running back. Years when Alabama has had a dominant running game, all the backs looked good. Sure there was a hierarchy but the top 2 or 3 all looked good. In years when Alabama’s running game struggled, all the backs looked bad at times.
A RB3 with a great offensive line will be more productive than a RB1 future NFL starter with a trash offensive line.
I think breakout wide receivers have more of a game changing impact than do running backs. Look at true freshmen Williams and Smith last year. Then try to think of a true freshman runnjng back who was a real game changer. I can’t think of one. Running backs are largely the result of offensive schemes, experience, and time in the weight room and are much more interchangeable than WR.
There are some positions, especially on defense, that are hybrids. Outside linebackers that are effectively defensive ends, oversized safeties that play the roll of linebacker at times, and undersized linebackers labeled as safeties that are used on passing downs.
A RB3 with a great offensive line will be more productive than a RB1 future NFL starter with a trash offensive line.
I think breakout wide receivers have more of a game changing impact than do running backs. Look at true freshmen Williams and Smith last year. Then try to think of a true freshman runnjng back who was a real game changer. I can’t think of one. Running backs are largely the result of offensive schemes, experience, and time in the weight room and are much more interchangeable than WR.
There are some positions, especially on defense, that are hybrids. Outside linebackers that are effectively defensive ends, oversized safeties that play the roll of linebacker at times, and undersized linebackers labeled as safeties that are used on passing downs.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 2:00 pm to captdalton
quote:
I am sure some here will disagree, but I think outside of QB, the lines are more important than any other position on the field.
Well you're damn sure right, although most fanboys (and yes even coaches) would argue with that.
You're right because it's actually harder to find 5 guys who will go to the wall play after play, than it is to find somebody who can run fast.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 2:08 pm to Scoob
It is all hypothetical, but if LSU had instead had the best secondary in college football and a very good defensive line those years, but the worst QB in the SEC and a bad offensive line, I bet they would have lost even more than 7 games. Jayden Daniels won LSU more football games than the secondary lost them.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 2:52 pm to captdalton
quote:
What positions are most important for success? I think most agree in today’s era, QB is most important. What about the rest?
Don't know why that first post went up when I hit quote - but whatever.
No - I disagree strongly. QB is the most important - once you have all the other important stuff. And that's why I believe college gets it wrong, and the pros get it wrong.
The most important positions on any offense, as a group, are the offensive line. And you're only as good as your weakest offensive lineman. Put the best QB behind an offensive line that can't at least hold even ? And you're screwed.
Same defensively, with a caveat. Since we're all playing 3-4 - the most important position group is the three down lineman and two inside backers. If they can't hold the line of scrimmage ? Everything else is a waste of time.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 4:37 pm to captdalton
1) Offensive Tackles
2) Quarterbacks
3) Interior Defensive Lineman
4) Edge Rushers
5) Outside Receivers
6) Corners
7) The Rest
2) Quarterbacks
3) Interior Defensive Lineman
4) Edge Rushers
5) Outside Receivers
6) Corners
7) The Rest
Posted on 3/25/25 at 5:14 pm to captdalton
DT/NT is #1. There are tons of teams that have won with mediocre qb’s, but virtually every national champion has been elite against the run between the tackles
Popular
Back to top
